Fixed latex2html weirdness with footnotes.

Doc/ref/ref4.tex

@@ -70,12 +70,12 @@ bind the class or function name in the defining block), and targets
 that are identifiers if occurring in an assignment, \keyword{for} loop
 header, or in the second position of an \keyword{except} clause
 header.  Local names are searched only on the local namespace; global
-names are searched only in the global and built-in namespace.%
+names are searched only in the global and built-in
-%
+namespace.\footnote{
-\footnote{If the code block contains \keyword{exec} statements or the
+If the code block contains \keyword{exec} statements or the construct
-construct ``\samp{from \ldots import *}'', the semantics of local
+``\samp{from \ldots import *}'', the semantics of local names change:
-names change: local name lookup first searches the local namespace,
+local name lookup first searches the local namespace, then the global
-then the global namespace and the built-in namespace.}
+namespace and the built-in namespace.}
 
 A target occurring in a \keyword{del} statement is also considered bound
 for this purpose (though the actual semantics are to ``unbind'' the
@@ -159,11 +159,11 @@ it is used for both.
 The built-in functions \function{globals()} and \function{locals()} returns a
 dictionary representing the current global and local namespace,
 respectively.  The effect of modifications to this dictionary on the
-namespace are undefined.%
+namespace are undefined.\footnote{
-\footnote{The current implementations return the dictionary actually 
+The current implementations return the dictionary actually used to
-used to implement the namespace, \emph{except} for functions, where
+implement the namespace, \emph{except} for functions, where the
-the optimizer may cause the local namespace to be implemented
+optimizer may cause the local namespace to be implemented differently,
-differently, and \function{locals()} returns a read-only dictionary.}
+and \function{locals()} returns a read-only dictionary.}
 
 \section{Exceptions\label{exceptions}}
 

Doc/ref/ref5.tex

@@ -718,8 +718,8 @@ corresponding items.
 
 \item
 Mappings (dictionaries) are compared through lexicographic
-comparison of their sorted (key, value) lists.%
+comparison of their sorted (key, value) lists.\footnote{
-\footnote{This is expensive since it requires sorting the keys first,
+This is expensive since it requires sorting the keys first,
 but it is about the only sensible definition.  An earlier version of
 Python compared dictionaries by identity only, but this caused
 surprises because people expected to be able to test a dictionary for
@@ -739,8 +739,8 @@ true if and only if there exists an index \var{i} such that
 \code{\var{x} = \var{y}[\var{i}]}.
 \code{\var{x} not in \var{y}} yields the inverse truth value.  The
 exception \exception{TypeError} is raised when \var{y} is not a sequence,
-or when \var{y} is a string and \var{x} is not a string of length one.%
+or when \var{y} is a string and \var{x} is not a string of length
-\footnote{The latter restriction is sometimes a nuisance.}
+one.\footnote{The latter restriction is sometimes a nuisance.}
 \opindex{in}
 \opindex{not in}
 \indexii{membership}{test}

Doc/ref/ref7.tex

@@ -305,9 +305,9 @@ default value, the corresponding argument may be omitted from a call,
 in which case the parameter's default value is substituted.  If a
 parameter has a default value, all following parameters must also have
 a default value --- this is a syntactic restriction that is not
-expressed by the grammar.%
+expressed by the grammar.\footnote{
-\footnote{Currently this is not checked; instead,
+Currently this is not checked; instead, \code{def f(a=1, b)} is
-\code{def f(a=1, b)} is interpreted as \code{def f(a=1, b=None)}.}
+interpreted as \code{def f(a=1, b=None)}.}
 \indexiii{default}{parameter}{value}
 
 \strong{Default parameter values are evaluated when the function