GH-97950: Use new-style index directive ('builtin') (GH-104164)
* Uncomment builtin removal in pairindextypes
* Use new-style index directive ('builtin') - C API
* Use new-style index directive ('builtin') - Extending
* Use new-style index directive ('builtin') - Library
* Use new-style index directive ('builtin') - Reference
* Use new-style index directive ('builtin') - Tutorial
(cherry picked from commit f5088006ca)
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
GH-97950: Use new-style index directive ('object') (GH-104158)
* Uncomment object removal in pairindextypes
* Use new-style index directive ('object') - C API
* Use new-style index directive ('object') - Library
* Use new-style index directive ('object') - Reference
* Use new-style index directive ('object') - Tutorial
(cherry picked from commit 6ab463684b)
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
A opy of GH-98549, whose author (@icecream17) uses a school computer that blocks the CLA site. I did not mention this in commit comment above so CLA bot does not pick up the name and request the CLA again.
(cherry picked from commit a86d854522)
Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
It is now considered a historical accident that e.g. `for` loops and the `iter()` built-in function do not require the iterators they work with to define `__iter__`, only `__next__`.
The documentation explaining Python's data model does not adequately explain
the differences between ``__getitem__`` and ``__class_getitem__``, nor does it
explain when each is called. There is an attempt at explaining
``__class_getitem__`` in the documentation for ``GenericAlias`` objects, but
this does not give sufficient clarity into how the method works. Moreover, it
is the wrong place for that information to be found; the explanation of
``__class_getitem__`` should be in the documentation explaining the data model.
This PR has been split off from GH-29335.
It should be noted that this part of the documentation is redundant with
function.rst's documentation of int. This one was correctly updated with Python 3.8.
Remove the @asyncio.coroutine decorator
enabling legacy generator-based coroutines to be compatible with async/await
code; remove asyncio.coroutines.CoroWrapper used for wrapping
legacy coroutine objects in the debug mode.
The decorator has been deprecated
since Python 3.8 and the removal was initially scheduled for Python 3.10.
Accessing the following attributes will now fire PEP 578 style audit hooks as ("object.__getattr__", obj, name):
* PyTracebackObject: tb_frame
* PyFrameObject: f_code
* PyGenObject: gi_code, gi_frame
* PyCoroObject: cr_code, cr_frame
* PyAsyncGenObject: ag_code, ag_frame
Add an AUDIT_READ attribute flag aliased to READ_RESTRICTED.
Update obsolete flag documentation.
This is a first edition, ready to go out with the implementation. We'll iterate during the rest of the period leading up to 3.10.0.
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>
Co-authored-by: Fidget-Spinner <28750310+Fidget-Spinner@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandt Bucher <brandt@python.org>
Co-authored-by: Raymond Hettinger <1623689+rhettinger@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org>
This is a trivial fix to [bpo-39416](), which didn't come up until it was already committed
```
Change "Numeric" to "numeric".
I believe this is trivial enough to not need an issue or a NEWS entry, although
I'm unclear on what branches the original pull request received backports.
```
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:merwok
[bpo-39416](): Document string representations of the Numeric classes
This is a change to the specification of the Python language.
The idea here is to put sane minimal limits on the Python language's default
representations of its Numeric classes. That way "Marty's Robotic Massage Parlor
and Python Interpreter" implementation of Python won't do anything too
crazy.
Some discussion in the email thread:
Subject: Documenting Python's float.__str__()
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/FV22TKT3S2Q3P7PNN6MCXI6IX3HRRNAL/
Miss Islington (bot)