perf(reactivity): avoid unnecessary recursion in removeSub (#12135)
This commit is contained in:
parent
f6d9926236
commit
ec917cfdb9
|
@ -1107,4 +1107,36 @@ describe('reactivity/computed', () => {
|
|||
end.prop4.value,
|
||||
]).toMatchObject([-2, -4, 2, 3])
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
test('performance when removing dependencies from deeply nested computeds', () => {
|
||||
const base = ref(1)
|
||||
const trigger = ref(true)
|
||||
const computeds: ComputedRef<number>[] = []
|
||||
|
||||
const LAYERS = 30
|
||||
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < LAYERS; i++) {
|
||||
const earlier = [...computeds]
|
||||
|
||||
computeds.push(
|
||||
computed(() => {
|
||||
return base.value + earlier.reduce((sum, c) => sum + c.value, 0)
|
||||
}),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const tail = computed(() =>
|
||||
trigger.value ? computeds[computeds.length - 1].value : 0,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
const t0 = performance.now()
|
||||
expect(tail.value).toBe(2 ** (LAYERS - 1))
|
||||
const t1 = performance.now()
|
||||
expect(t1 - t0).toBeLessThan(process.env.CI ? 100 : 30)
|
||||
|
||||
trigger.value = false
|
||||
expect(tail.value).toBe(0)
|
||||
const t2 = performance.now()
|
||||
expect(t2 - t1).toBeLessThan(process.env.CI ? 100 : 30)
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -426,23 +426,24 @@ function removeSub(link: Link, soft = false) {
|
|||
nextSub.prevSub = prevSub
|
||||
link.nextSub = undefined
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (dep.subs === link) {
|
||||
// was previous tail, point new tail to prev
|
||||
dep.subs = prevSub
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (__DEV__ && dep.subsHead === link) {
|
||||
// was previous head, point new head to next
|
||||
dep.subsHead = nextSub
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!dep.subs && dep.computed) {
|
||||
// if computed, unsubscribe it from all its deps so this computed and its
|
||||
// value can be GCed
|
||||
dep.computed.flags &= ~EffectFlags.TRACKING
|
||||
for (let l = dep.computed.deps; l; l = l.nextDep) {
|
||||
// here we are only "soft" unsubscribing because the computed still keeps
|
||||
// referencing the deps and the dep should not decrease its sub count
|
||||
removeSub(l, true)
|
||||
if (dep.subs === link) {
|
||||
// was previous tail, point new tail to prev
|
||||
dep.subs = prevSub
|
||||
|
||||
if (!prevSub && dep.computed) {
|
||||
// if computed, unsubscribe it from all its deps so this computed and its
|
||||
// value can be GCed
|
||||
dep.computed.flags &= ~EffectFlags.TRACKING
|
||||
for (let l = dep.computed.deps; l; l = l.nextDep) {
|
||||
// here we are only "soft" unsubscribing because the computed still keeps
|
||||
// referencing the deps and the dep should not decrease its sub count
|
||||
removeSub(l, true)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue