docs: api_extension: Remove links to the stale example patches

The patches used as an example for the api_extension manual don't hold
up to the current standards any more. Carefully remove links and
mentions of the patches from the docs.

Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Krempa 2018-08-23 10:21:03 +02:00
parent f2019083de
commit 3ce03abc1d
1 changed files with 17 additions and 77 deletions

View File

@ -8,14 +8,9 @@
<p>
This document walks you through the process of implementing a new
API in libvirt. It uses as an example the addition of an API for
separating maximum from current vcpu usage of a domain, over
the course of a fifteen-patch series.
Remember that new API consists of any new public functions, as
well as the addition of flags or extensions of XML used by
existing functions. The example in this document adds both new
functions and an XML extension. Not all libvirt API additions
require quite as many patches.
API in libvirt. Remember that new API consists of any new public
functions, as well as the addition of flags or extensions of XML used by
existing functions.
</p>
<p>
@ -27,12 +22,7 @@
added to libvirt. Someone may already be working on the feature you
want. Also, recognize that everything you write is likely to undergo
significant rework as you discuss it with the other developers, so
don't wait too long before getting feedback. In the vcpu example
below, list feedback was first requested
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-September/msg00423.html">here</a>
and resulted in several rounds of improvements before coding
began. In turn, this example is slightly rearranged from the actual
order of the commits.
don't wait too long before getting feedback.
</p>
<p>
@ -81,14 +71,13 @@
</p>
<p>
Submit new code in the form shown in the example code: one patch
per step. That's not to say submit patches before you have working
functionality--get the whole thing working and make sure you're happy
with it. Then use git or some other version control system that lets
you rewrite your commit history and break patches into pieces so you
don't drop a big blob of code on the mailing list in one go.
Also, you should follow the upstream tree, and rebase your
series to adapt your patches to work with any other changes
Submit new code in the form of one patch per step. That's not to say
submit patches before you have working functionality--get the whole thing
working and make sure you're happy with it. Then use git or some other
version control system that lets you rewrite your commit history and
break patches into pieces so you don't drop a big blob of code on the
mailing list in one go. Also, you should follow the upstream tree, and
rebase your series to adapt your patches to work with any other changes
that were accepted upstream during your development.
</p>
@ -101,8 +90,6 @@
separately.
</p>
<p>With that said, let's begin.</p>
<h2><a name='publicapi'>Defining the public API</a></h2>
<p>The first task is to define the public API. If the new API
@ -133,10 +120,6 @@
rework it as you go through the process of implementing it.
</p>
<p class="example">See <a href="api_extension/0001-add-to-xml.patch">0001-add-to-xml.patch</a>
and <a href="api_extension/0002-add-new-public-API.patch">0002-add-new-public-API.patch</a>
for example code.</p>
<h2><a name='internalapi'>Defining the internal API</a></h2>
<p>
@ -164,8 +147,6 @@
provide a <code>NULL</code> stub for the new function.
</p>
<p class="example">See <a href="api_extension/0003-define-internal-driver-API.patch">0003-define-internal-driver-API.patch</a></p>
<h2><a name='implpublic'>Implementing the public API</a></h2>
<p>
@ -199,20 +180,14 @@
<p><code>src/libvirt.c</code></p>
<p class="example">See <a href="api_extension/0004-implement-the-public-APIs.patch">0004-implement-the-public-APIs.patch</a></p>
<h2><a name='remoteproto'>Implementing the remote protocol</a></h2>
<p>
Implementing the remote protocol is essentially a
straightforward exercise which is probably most easily
understood by referring to the existing code and the example
patch. It involves several related changes, including the
regeneration of derived files, with further details below.
understood by referring to the existing code.
</p>
<p class="example">See <a href="api_extension/0005-implement-the-remote-protocol.patch">0005-implement-the-remote-protocol.patch</a></p>
<h3><a name='wireproto'>Defining the wire protocol format</a></h3>
<p>
@ -298,8 +273,6 @@
existing lines probably imply a backwards-incompatible API change.
</p>
<p class="example">See <a href="api_extension/0005-implement-the-remote-protocol.patch">0005-implement-the-remote-protocol.patch</a></p>
<h2><a id="internaluseapi">Use the new API internally</a></h2>
<p>
@ -312,8 +285,6 @@
not necessary if the new API has no relation to existing API.
</p>
<p class="example">See <a href="api_extension/0006-make-old-API-trivially-wrap-to-new-API.patch">0006-make-old-API-trivially-wrap-to-new-API.patch</a></p>
<h2><a id="virshuseapi">Expose the new API in virsh</a></h2>
<p>
@ -343,8 +314,6 @@
tools/virsh.pod
</code></p>
<p class="example">See <a href="api_extension/0007-add-virsh-support.patch">0007-add-virsh-support.patch</a></p>
<h2><a id="driverimpl">Implement the driver methods</a></h2>
<p>
@ -371,8 +340,6 @@
the same way as the older API wrappers.
</p>
<p class="example">See <a href="api_extension/0008-support-new-xml.patch">0008-support-new-xml.patch</a></p>
<h3><a id="drivercode">Implement driver handling</a></h3>
<p>
@ -384,41 +351,14 @@
</p>
<p>
In the example patches, three separate drivers are supported:
test, qemu, and xen. It is always a good idea to patch the test
driver in addition to the target driver, to prove that the API
can be used for more than one driver. The example updates the
test driver in one patch:
It is always a good idea to patch the test driver in addition to the
target driver, to prove that the API can be used for more than one
driver.
</p>
<p class="example">See <a href="api_extension/0009-support-all-flags-in-test-driver.patch">0009-support-all-flags-in-test-driver.patch</a></p>
<p>
The qemu changes were easier to split into two phases, one for
updating the mapping between the new XML and the hypervisor
command line arguments, and one for supporting all possible
flags of the new API:
</p>
<p class="example">See <a href="api_extension/0010-improve-vcpu-support-in-qemu-command-line.patch">0010-improve-vcpu-support-in-qemu-command-line.patch</a>
and <a href="api_extension/0011-complete-vcpu-support-in-qemu-driver.patch">0011-complete-vcpu-support-in-qemu-driver.patch</a></p>
<p>
Finally, the example breaks the xen driver changes across four
patches. One maps the XML changes to the hypervisor command,
the next two are independently implementing the getter and
setter APIs, and the last one provides cleanup of code that was
rendered dead by the new API.
</p>
<p class="example">See <a href="api_extension/0012-improve-vcpu-support-in-xen-command-line.patch">0012-improve-vcpu-support-in-xen-command-line.patch</a>,
<a href="api_extension/0013-improve-getting-xen-vcpu-counts.patch">0013-improve-getting-xen-vcpu-counts.patch</a>,
<a href="api_extension/0014-improve-setting-xen-vcpu-counts.patch">0014-improve-setting-xen-vcpu-counts.patch</a>,
and <a href="api_extension/0015-remove-dead-xen-code.patch">0015-remove-dead-xen-code.patch</a></p>
<p>
The exact details of the example code are probably uninteresting
unless you're concerned with virtual cpu management.
Any cleanups resulting from the changes should be added as separate
patches at the end of the series.
</p>
<p>