The 'checkBitmap' helper uses 'virBitmapFormat' internally and also
reports better errors. Use it instead of the open-coded checks.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
The function will also be reusable in other places of the code by making
the size check optional. For now only test12* is refactored since it
used TEST_MAP directly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
The test validates two outputs. Don't reuse 'str' for both.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
'test4' was testing three distinct operations on separate instances of a
bitmap. Split it up into 'test4a', 'test4b' and 'test4c' so that the
'bitmap' variable is not reused.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
'test12' was testing two distinct operations on two instances of a
bitmap. Split it up into 'test12a' and 'test12b' so that the 'bitmap'
variable is not reused.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Test an empty bitmap including it's extension via the self-expanding
APIs and and a "0" and "" strings when converting the string back and
forth.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Move scope of variables and get rid of the 'cleanup' section.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
There's only one combination used so we can remove the rest.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
virBitmapNewEmpty can't fail now so we can make it obvious and fix all
callers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
It's possible that virBitmapNewString returns NULL with an error
string (and not an allocation failure that would abort); however, if
virBitmapToString is called with a NULL @bitmap, then it will fail
in an ugly manner. So rather than have if (!map && !str) logic, split
the checks for each variable.
Found by Coverity
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Since commit 44e7f02915
util: rewrite auto cleanup macros to use glib's equivalent
VIR_AUTOPTR aliases to g_autoptr. Replace all of its use by the GLib
macro version.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Use G_GNUC_UNUSED from GLib instead of ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
The function only reduces the size of the bitmap thus we can use the
appropriate shrinking function which also does not have any return
value.
Since virBitmapShrink now does not return any value callers need to be
fixed as well.
Some of the other functions depend on the fact that unused bits and longs are
always zero and it's less error-prone to clear it than fix the other functions.
It's enough to zero out one piece of the map since we're calling realloc() to
get rid of the rest (and updating map_len).
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540817
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Already introduced in the past with 9479642fd3, but then renamed to
virBitmapIntersect by a908e9e45e. This time we'll really use it.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Our bitmaps can be represented as data (raw bytes for which we have
virBitmapNewData() and virBitmapToData()), human representation (list
of numbers in a string for which we have virBitmapParse() and
virBitmapFormat()) and hexadecimal string (for which we have only
virBitmapToString()). So let's add the missing complement for the
last one so that we can parse hexadecimal strings.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
It is literally only a wrapper around virBitmapNewData() and
virBitmapFormat(), only the naming was wrong since it was introduced.
And because we have virBitmap*String functions where the meaning of
the 'String' is constant, this might confuse someone.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Right-aligning backslashes when defining macros or using complex
commands in Makefiles looks cute, but as soon as any changes is
required to the code you end up with either distractingly broken
alignment or unnecessarily big diffs where most of the changes
are just pushing all backslashes a few characters to one side.
Generated using
$ git grep -El '[[:blank:]][[:blank:]]\\$' | \
grep -E '*\.([chx]|am|mk)$$' | \
while read f; do \
sed -Ei 's/[[:blank:]]*[[:blank:]]\\$/ \\/g' "$f"; \
done
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
To make sure bit 'b' fits into the bitmap, we need to allocate b+1
bits, since we number from 0.
Adjust the bitmap test to set a bit at a multiple of 16.
That way the test fails without this fix, because the VIR_REALLOC
call clears the newly added memory even if the original pointer
has not changed.
As the empty bitmap exists, we should also test it. This patch adds
test cases for the procedures 'virBitmapNextSetBit', 'virBitmapLastSetBit',
'virBitmapNextClearBit'.
Tested-by: Sascha Silbe <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sascha Silbe <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This will be used for the caller that needs to specify a separator.
Currently identical to virBitmapParse.
Also change one test case to use the new function.
In some cases it's impractical to use the regular APIs as the bitmap
size needs to be pre-declared. These new APIs allow to use bitmaps that
self expand.
The new code adds a property to the bitmap to track the allocation of
memory so that VIR_RESIZE_N can be used.
We have macros for both positive and negative string matching.
Therefore there is no need to use !STREQ or !STRNEQ. At the same
time as we are dropping this, new syntax-check rule is
introduced to make sure we won't introduce it again.
Signed-off-by: Ishmanpreet Kaur Khera <khera.ishman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
This patch adds checks for empty bitmaps right after the calls of
virBitmapParse. These only include spots where set API's are called and
where domain's XML is parsed.
Also, it partially reverts commit 983f5a which added a check for
invalid nodeset "0,^0" into virBitmapParse function. This change broke
the logic, as an empty bitmap should not cause an error.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210545
The test case average timing code has not been used by any test
case ever. Delete it to remove complexity.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Coverity reported a memleak in the test added in 7efd5fd1b0. In case
the code will be broken and the code will actually parse a faulty bitmap
the resulting pointer would be leaked. Free it although that shouldn't
ever happen.
Previous patch fixed an issue where, when parsing a bitmap from the
string, the bounds of the bitmap weren't checked. That flaw resulted into
crashes. This test tests that case to avoid it in the future.
Convert the type of loop iterators named 'i', 'j', k',
'ii', 'jj', 'kk', to be 'size_t' instead of 'int' or
'unsigned int', also santizing 'ii', 'jj', 'kk' to use
the normal 'i', 'j', 'k' naming
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Commit id '1acfc171' resulted in the following valgrind failure:
==25317== 136 (24 direct, 112 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 4 of 4
==25317== at 0x4A06B6F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:593)
==25317== by 0x4C6F851: virAlloc (viralloc.c:124)
==25317== by 0x4C71493: virBitmapNew (virbitmap.c:74)
==25317== by 0x4C71B79: virBitmapNewData (virbitmap.c:434)
==25317== by 0x402EF2: test8 (virbitmaptest.c:436)
==25317== by 0x40499F: virtTestRun (testutils.c:157)
==25317== by 0x402E8D: mymain (virbitmaptest.c:474)
==25317== by 0x404FDA: virtTestMain (testutils.c:719)
==25317== by 0x39D0821A04: (below main) (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.16.so)
We had an easy way to iterate set bits, but not for iterating
cleared bits.
* src/util/virbitmap.h (virBitmapNextClearBit): New prototype.
* src/util/virbitmap.c (virBitmapNextClearBit): Implement it.
* src/libvirt_private.syms (bitmap.h): Export it.
* tests/virbitmaptest.c (test4): Test it.
Peter Krempa