linux/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c

305 lines
9.1 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (C) 2008 SuSE Linux Products GmbH
* Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
*
* May be copied or modified under the terms of the GNU General Public License
*
* video_detect.c:
* Provides acpi_is_video_device() for early scanning of ACPI devices in scan.c
* There a Linux specific (Spec does not provide a HID for video devices) is
* assigned
*
* After PCI devices are glued with ACPI devices
* acpi_get_pci_dev() can be called to identify ACPI graphics
* devices for which a real graphics card is plugged in
*
* Now acpi_video_get_capabilities() can be called to check which
* capabilities the graphics cards plugged in support. The check for general
* video capabilities will be triggered by the first caller of
* acpi_video_get_capabilities(NULL); which will happen when the first
* backlight switching supporting driver calls:
* acpi_video_backlight_support();
*
* Depending on whether ACPI graphics extensions (cmp. ACPI spec Appendix B)
* are available, video.ko should be used to handle the device.
*
* Otherwise vendor specific drivers like thinkpad_acpi, asus-laptop,
* sony_acpi,... can take care about backlight brightness.
*
* If CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO is neither set as "compiled in" (y) nor as a module (m)
* this file will not be compiled, acpi_video_get_capabilities() and
* acpi_video_backlight_support() will always return 0 and vendor specific
* drivers always can handle backlight.
*
*/
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/dmi.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware expects Windows 8 According to Matthew Garrett, "Windows 8 leaves backlight control up to individual graphics drivers rather than making ACPI calls itself. There's plenty of evidence to suggest that the Intel driver for Windows [8] doesn't use the ACPI interface, including the fact that it's broken on a bunch of machines when the OS claims to support Windows 8. The simplest thing to do appears to be to disable the ACPI backlight interface on these systems". There's a problem with that approach, however, because simply avoiding to register the ACPI backlight interface if the firmware calls _OSI for Windows 8 may not work in the following situations: (1) The ACPI backlight interface actually works on the given system and the i915 driver is not loaded (e.g. another graphics driver is used). (2) The ACPI backlight interface doesn't work on the given system, but there is a vendor platform driver that will register its own, equally broken, backlight interface if not prevented from doing so by the ACPI subsystem. Therefore we need to allow the ACPI backlight interface to be registered until the i915 driver is loaded which then will unregister it if the firmware has called _OSI for Windows 8 (or will register the ACPI video driver without backlight support if not already present). For this reason, introduce an alternative function for registering ACPI video, acpi_video_register_with_quirks(), that will check whether or not the ACPI video driver has already been registered and whether or not the backlight Windows 8 quirk has to be applied. If the quirk has to be applied, it will block the ACPI backlight support and either unregister the backlight interface if the ACPI video driver has already been registered, or register the ACPI video driver without the backlight interface otherwise. Make the i915 driver use acpi_video_register_with_quirks() instead of acpi_video_register() in i915_driver_load(). This change is based on earlier patches from Matthew Garrett, Chun-Yi Lee and Seth Forshee and includes a fix from Aaron Lu's. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51231 Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@gmail.com> Tested-by: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
2013-07-18 08:08:06 +08:00
#include "internal.h"
#define PREFIX "ACPI: "
ACPI_MODULE_NAME("video");
#define _COMPONENT ACPI_VIDEO_COMPONENT
static long acpi_video_support;
static bool acpi_video_caps_checked;
static acpi_status
acpi_backlight_cap_match(acpi_handle handle, u32 level, void *context,
void **return_value)
{
long *cap = context;
if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_BCM") &&
acpi_has_method(handle, "_BCL")) {
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Found generic backlight "
"support\n"));
*cap |= ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT;
if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_BQC"))
printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX "No _BQC method, "
"cannot determine initial brightness\n");
/* We have backlight support, no need to scan further */
return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
}
return 0;
}
/* Returns true if the ACPI object is a video device which can be
* handled by video.ko.
* The device will get a Linux specific CID added in scan.c to
* identify the device as an ACPI graphics device
* Be aware that the graphics device may not be physically present
* Use acpi_video_get_capabilities() to detect general ACPI video
* capabilities of present cards
*/
long acpi_is_video_device(acpi_handle handle)
{
long video_caps = 0;
ACPI / Video: Probe for output switch method when searching video devices. This patch reverts one hunk of 677bd810eedce61edf15452491781ff046b92edc "ACPI video: remove output switching control", namely the removal of probing for _DOS/_DOD when searching for video devices. This is needed on some Fujitsu Laptops (at least S7110, P8010) for the ACPI backlight interface to work, as an these machines, neither ROM nor posting methods are available, and after removal of output switching, none of the caps triggers, which prevents the backlight search from being entered. Tested on a Fujitsu Lifebook S7110 and Fujitsu Lifebook P8010. This probably fixes https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27312 for the people who have no entry in /sys/class/backlight. This is the complete list of public (starting with "_") methods implemented on the S7110, BIOS rev 1.34: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._ADR \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DOS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DOD \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.CRT._ADR \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.CRT._DCS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.CRT._DGS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.CRT._DSS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._ADR \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._BCL \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._BCM \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._BQC \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._DCS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._DGS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._DSS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._PS0 \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._PS3 \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.TV._ADR \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.TV._DCS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.TV._DGS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.TV._DSS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.DVI._ADR \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.DVI._DCS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.DVI._DGS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.DVI._DSS Signed-off-by: Michael Karcher <kernel@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-02-12 08:40:16 +08:00
/* Is this device able to support video switching ? */
if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_DOD") || acpi_has_method(handle, "_DOS"))
ACPI / Video: Probe for output switch method when searching video devices. This patch reverts one hunk of 677bd810eedce61edf15452491781ff046b92edc "ACPI video: remove output switching control", namely the removal of probing for _DOS/_DOD when searching for video devices. This is needed on some Fujitsu Laptops (at least S7110, P8010) for the ACPI backlight interface to work, as an these machines, neither ROM nor posting methods are available, and after removal of output switching, none of the caps triggers, which prevents the backlight search from being entered. Tested on a Fujitsu Lifebook S7110 and Fujitsu Lifebook P8010. This probably fixes https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27312 for the people who have no entry in /sys/class/backlight. This is the complete list of public (starting with "_") methods implemented on the S7110, BIOS rev 1.34: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._ADR \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DOS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DOD \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.CRT._ADR \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.CRT._DCS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.CRT._DGS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.CRT._DSS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._ADR \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._BCL \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._BCM \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._BQC \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._DCS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._DGS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._DSS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._PS0 \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.LCD._PS3 \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.TV._ADR \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.TV._DCS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.TV._DGS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.TV._DSS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.DVI._ADR \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.DVI._DCS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.DVI._DGS \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.DVI._DSS Signed-off-by: Michael Karcher <kernel@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-02-12 08:40:16 +08:00
video_caps |= ACPI_VIDEO_OUTPUT_SWITCHING;
/* Is this device able to retrieve a video ROM ? */
if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_ROM"))
video_caps |= ACPI_VIDEO_ROM_AVAILABLE;
/* Is this device able to configure which video head to be POSTed ? */
if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_VPO") &&
acpi_has_method(handle, "_GPD") &&
acpi_has_method(handle, "_SPD"))
video_caps |= ACPI_VIDEO_DEVICE_POSTING;
/* Only check for backlight functionality if one of the above hit. */
if (video_caps)
acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, handle,
ACPI_UINT32_MAX, acpi_backlight_cap_match, NULL,
&video_caps, NULL);
return video_caps;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_is_video_device);
static acpi_status
find_video(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
{
long *cap = context;
struct pci_dev *dev;
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
const struct acpi_device_id video_ids[] = {
{ACPI_VIDEO_HID, 0},
{"", 0},
};
if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev))
return AE_OK;
if (!acpi_match_device_ids(acpi_dev, video_ids)) {
dev = acpi_get_pci_dev(handle);
if (!dev)
return AE_OK;
pci_dev_put(dev);
*cap |= acpi_is_video_device(handle);
}
return AE_OK;
}
/* Force to use vendor driver when the ACPI device is known to be
* buggy */
static int video_detect_force_vendor(const struct dmi_system_id *d)
{
acpi_video_support |= ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_DMI_VENDOR;
return 0;
}
static struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
/* On Samsung X360, the BIOS will set a flag (VDRV) if generic
* ACPI backlight device is used. This flag will definitively break
* the backlight interface (even the vendor interface) untill next
* reboot. It's why we should prevent video.ko from being used here
* and we can't rely on a later call to acpi_video_unregister().
*/
{
.callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
.ident = "X360",
.matches = {
DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."),
DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "X360"),
DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "X360"),
},
},
{
.callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
.ident = "Asus UL30VT",
.matches = {
DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK Computer Inc."),
DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "UL30VT"),
},
},
{
.callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
.ident = "Asus UL30A",
.matches = {
DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK Computer Inc."),
DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "UL30A"),
},
},
{ },
};
/*
* Returns the video capabilities of a specific ACPI graphics device
*
* if NULL is passed as argument all ACPI devices are enumerated and
* all graphics capabilities of physically present devices are
* summarized and returned. This is cached and done only once.
*/
long acpi_video_get_capabilities(acpi_handle graphics_handle)
{
long caps = 0;
struct acpi_device *tmp_dev;
acpi_status status;
if (acpi_video_caps_checked && graphics_handle == NULL)
return acpi_video_support;
if (!graphics_handle) {
/* Only do the global walk through all graphics devices once */
acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
ACPI_UINT32_MAX, find_video, NULL,
&caps, NULL);
/* There might be boot param flags set already... */
acpi_video_support |= caps;
acpi_video_caps_checked = 1;
/* Add blacklists here. Be careful to use the right *DMI* bits
* to still be able to override logic via boot params, e.g.:
*
* if (dmi_name_in_vendors("XY")) {
* acpi_video_support |=
* ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_DMI_VENDOR;
*}
*/
dmi_check_system(video_detect_dmi_table);
} else {
status = acpi_bus_get_device(graphics_handle, &tmp_dev);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Invalid device"));
return 0;
}
acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, graphics_handle,
ACPI_UINT32_MAX, find_video, NULL,
&caps, NULL);
}
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "We have 0x%lX video support %s %s\n",
graphics_handle ? caps : acpi_video_support,
graphics_handle ? "on device " : "in general",
graphics_handle ? acpi_device_bid(tmp_dev) : ""));
return caps;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_video_get_capabilities);
static void acpi_video_caps_check(void)
{
/*
* We must check whether the ACPI graphics device is physically plugged
* in. Therefore this must be called after binding PCI and ACPI devices
*/
if (!acpi_video_caps_checked)
acpi_video_get_capabilities(NULL);
}
bool acpi_osi_is_win8(void)
ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware expects Windows 8 According to Matthew Garrett, "Windows 8 leaves backlight control up to individual graphics drivers rather than making ACPI calls itself. There's plenty of evidence to suggest that the Intel driver for Windows [8] doesn't use the ACPI interface, including the fact that it's broken on a bunch of machines when the OS claims to support Windows 8. The simplest thing to do appears to be to disable the ACPI backlight interface on these systems". There's a problem with that approach, however, because simply avoiding to register the ACPI backlight interface if the firmware calls _OSI for Windows 8 may not work in the following situations: (1) The ACPI backlight interface actually works on the given system and the i915 driver is not loaded (e.g. another graphics driver is used). (2) The ACPI backlight interface doesn't work on the given system, but there is a vendor platform driver that will register its own, equally broken, backlight interface if not prevented from doing so by the ACPI subsystem. Therefore we need to allow the ACPI backlight interface to be registered until the i915 driver is loaded which then will unregister it if the firmware has called _OSI for Windows 8 (or will register the ACPI video driver without backlight support if not already present). For this reason, introduce an alternative function for registering ACPI video, acpi_video_register_with_quirks(), that will check whether or not the ACPI video driver has already been registered and whether or not the backlight Windows 8 quirk has to be applied. If the quirk has to be applied, it will block the ACPI backlight support and either unregister the backlight interface if the ACPI video driver has already been registered, or register the ACPI video driver without the backlight interface otherwise. Make the i915 driver use acpi_video_register_with_quirks() instead of acpi_video_register() in i915_driver_load(). This change is based on earlier patches from Matthew Garrett, Chun-Yi Lee and Seth Forshee and includes a fix from Aaron Lu's. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51231 Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@gmail.com> Tested-by: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
2013-07-18 08:08:06 +08:00
{
Revert "ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware expects Windows 8" We attempted to address a regression introduced by commit a57f7f9 (ACPICA: Add Windows8/Server2012 string for _OSI method.) after which ACPI video backlight support doesn't work on a number of systems, because the relevant AML methods in the ACPI tables in their BIOSes become useless after the BIOS has been told that the OS is compatible with Windows 8. That problem is tracked by the bug entry at: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51231 Commit 8c5bd7a (ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware expects Windows 8) introduced for this purpose essentially prevented the ACPI backlight support from being used if the BIOS had been told that the OS was compatible with Windows 8 and the i915 driver was loaded, in which case the backlight would always be handled by i915. Unfortunately, however, that turned out to cause problems with backlight to appear on multiple systems with symptoms indicating that i915 was unable to control the backlight on those systems as expected. For this reason, revert commit 8c5bd7a, but leave the function acpi_video_backlight_quirks() introduced by it, because another commit on top of it uses that function. References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/21/119 References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/22/261 References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/23/429 References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/23/459 References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/23/81 References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/24/27 Reported-and-tested-by: James Hogan <james@albanarts.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk> Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> Reported-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@adurom.com> Tested-by: Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-26 03:43:39 +08:00
return acpi_gbl_osi_data >= ACPI_OSI_WIN_8;
ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware expects Windows 8 According to Matthew Garrett, "Windows 8 leaves backlight control up to individual graphics drivers rather than making ACPI calls itself. There's plenty of evidence to suggest that the Intel driver for Windows [8] doesn't use the ACPI interface, including the fact that it's broken on a bunch of machines when the OS claims to support Windows 8. The simplest thing to do appears to be to disable the ACPI backlight interface on these systems". There's a problem with that approach, however, because simply avoiding to register the ACPI backlight interface if the firmware calls _OSI for Windows 8 may not work in the following situations: (1) The ACPI backlight interface actually works on the given system and the i915 driver is not loaded (e.g. another graphics driver is used). (2) The ACPI backlight interface doesn't work on the given system, but there is a vendor platform driver that will register its own, equally broken, backlight interface if not prevented from doing so by the ACPI subsystem. Therefore we need to allow the ACPI backlight interface to be registered until the i915 driver is loaded which then will unregister it if the firmware has called _OSI for Windows 8 (or will register the ACPI video driver without backlight support if not already present). For this reason, introduce an alternative function for registering ACPI video, acpi_video_register_with_quirks(), that will check whether or not the ACPI video driver has already been registered and whether or not the backlight Windows 8 quirk has to be applied. If the quirk has to be applied, it will block the ACPI backlight support and either unregister the backlight interface if the ACPI video driver has already been registered, or register the ACPI video driver without the backlight interface otherwise. Make the i915 driver use acpi_video_register_with_quirks() instead of acpi_video_register() in i915_driver_load(). This change is based on earlier patches from Matthew Garrett, Chun-Yi Lee and Seth Forshee and includes a fix from Aaron Lu's. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51231 Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@gmail.com> Tested-by: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
2013-07-18 08:08:06 +08:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_osi_is_win8);
ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware expects Windows 8 According to Matthew Garrett, "Windows 8 leaves backlight control up to individual graphics drivers rather than making ACPI calls itself. There's plenty of evidence to suggest that the Intel driver for Windows [8] doesn't use the ACPI interface, including the fact that it's broken on a bunch of machines when the OS claims to support Windows 8. The simplest thing to do appears to be to disable the ACPI backlight interface on these systems". There's a problem with that approach, however, because simply avoiding to register the ACPI backlight interface if the firmware calls _OSI for Windows 8 may not work in the following situations: (1) The ACPI backlight interface actually works on the given system and the i915 driver is not loaded (e.g. another graphics driver is used). (2) The ACPI backlight interface doesn't work on the given system, but there is a vendor platform driver that will register its own, equally broken, backlight interface if not prevented from doing so by the ACPI subsystem. Therefore we need to allow the ACPI backlight interface to be registered until the i915 driver is loaded which then will unregister it if the firmware has called _OSI for Windows 8 (or will register the ACPI video driver without backlight support if not already present). For this reason, introduce an alternative function for registering ACPI video, acpi_video_register_with_quirks(), that will check whether or not the ACPI video driver has already been registered and whether or not the backlight Windows 8 quirk has to be applied. If the quirk has to be applied, it will block the ACPI backlight support and either unregister the backlight interface if the ACPI video driver has already been registered, or register the ACPI video driver without the backlight interface otherwise. Make the i915 driver use acpi_video_register_with_quirks() instead of acpi_video_register() in i915_driver_load(). This change is based on earlier patches from Matthew Garrett, Chun-Yi Lee and Seth Forshee and includes a fix from Aaron Lu's. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51231 Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@gmail.com> Tested-by: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
2013-07-18 08:08:06 +08:00
/* Promote the vendor interface instead of the generic video module.
* This function allow DMI blacklists to be implemented by externals
* platform drivers instead of putting a big blacklist in video_detect.c
* After calling this function you will probably want to call
* acpi_video_unregister() to make sure the video module is not loaded
*/
void acpi_video_dmi_promote_vendor(void)
{
acpi_video_caps_check();
acpi_video_support |= ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_DMI_VENDOR;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_video_dmi_promote_vendor);
/* To be called when a driver who previously promoted the vendor
* interface */
void acpi_video_dmi_demote_vendor(void)
{
acpi_video_caps_check();
acpi_video_support &= ~ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_DMI_VENDOR;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_video_dmi_demote_vendor);
/* Returns true if video.ko can do backlight switching */
int acpi_video_backlight_support(void)
{
acpi_video_caps_check();
/* First check for boot param -> highest prio */
if (acpi_video_support & ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_VENDOR)
return 0;
else if (acpi_video_support & ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_VIDEO)
return 1;
/* Then check for DMI blacklist -> second highest prio */
if (acpi_video_support & ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_DMI_VENDOR)
return 0;
else if (acpi_video_support & ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_DMI_VIDEO)
return 1;
/* Then go the default way */
return acpi_video_support & ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_video_backlight_support);
/*
* Use acpi_backlight=vendor/video to force that backlight switching
* is processed by vendor specific acpi drivers or video.ko driver.
*/
static int __init acpi_backlight(char *str)
{
if (str == NULL || *str == '\0')
return 1;
else {
if (!strcmp("vendor", str))
acpi_video_support |=
ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_VENDOR;
if (!strcmp("video", str))
acpi_video_support |=
ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_VIDEO;
}
return 1;
}
__setup("acpi_backlight=", acpi_backlight);