linux/tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_mmap.c

518 lines
13 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* Copyright 2018 Google Inc.
* Author: Eric Dumazet (edumazet@google.com)
*
* Reference program demonstrating tcp mmap() usage,
* and SO_RCVLOWAT hints for receiver.
*
* Note : NIC with header split is needed to use mmap() on TCP :
* Each incoming frame must be a multiple of PAGE_SIZE bytes of TCP payload.
*
* How to use on loopback interface :
*
* ifconfig lo mtu 61512 # 15*4096 + 40 (ipv6 header) + 32 (TCP with TS option header)
* tcp_mmap -s -z &
* tcp_mmap -H ::1 -z
*
* Or leave default lo mtu, but use -M option to set TCP_MAXSEG option to (4096 + 12)
* (4096 : page size on x86, 12: TCP TS option length)
* tcp_mmap -s -z -M $((4096+12)) &
* tcp_mmap -H ::1 -z -M $((4096+12))
*
* Note: -z option on sender uses MSG_ZEROCOPY, which forces a copy when packets go through loopback interface.
* We might use sendfile() instead, but really this test program is about mmap(), for receivers ;)
*
* $ ./tcp_mmap -s & # Without mmap()
* $ for i in {1..4}; do ./tcp_mmap -H ::1 -z ; done
* received 32768 MB (0 % mmap'ed) in 14.1157 s, 19.4732 Gbit
* cpu usage user:0.057 sys:7.815, 240.234 usec per MB, 65531 c-switches
* received 32768 MB (0 % mmap'ed) in 14.6833 s, 18.7204 Gbit
* cpu usage user:0.043 sys:8.103, 248.596 usec per MB, 65524 c-switches
* received 32768 MB (0 % mmap'ed) in 11.143 s, 24.6682 Gbit
* cpu usage user:0.044 sys:6.576, 202.026 usec per MB, 65519 c-switches
* received 32768 MB (0 % mmap'ed) in 14.9056 s, 18.4413 Gbit
* cpu usage user:0.036 sys:8.193, 251.129 usec per MB, 65530 c-switches
* $ kill %1 # kill tcp_mmap server
*
* $ ./tcp_mmap -s -z & # With mmap()
* $ for i in {1..4}; do ./tcp_mmap -H ::1 -z ; done
* received 32768 MB (99.9939 % mmap'ed) in 6.73792 s, 40.7956 Gbit
* cpu usage user:0.045 sys:2.827, 87.6465 usec per MB, 65532 c-switches
* received 32768 MB (99.9939 % mmap'ed) in 7.26732 s, 37.8238 Gbit
* cpu usage user:0.037 sys:3.087, 95.3369 usec per MB, 65532 c-switches
* received 32768 MB (99.9939 % mmap'ed) in 7.61661 s, 36.0893 Gbit
* cpu usage user:0.046 sys:3.559, 110.016 usec per MB, 65529 c-switches
* received 32768 MB (99.9939 % mmap'ed) in 7.43764 s, 36.9577 Gbit
* cpu usage user:0.035 sys:3.467, 106.873 usec per MB, 65530 c-switches
*/
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <pthread.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <error.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/resource.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <poll.h>
#include <linux/tcp.h>
#include <assert.h>
#ifndef MSG_ZEROCOPY
#define MSG_ZEROCOPY 0x4000000
#endif
#define FILE_SZ (1ULL << 35)
static int cfg_family = AF_INET6;
static socklen_t cfg_alen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6);
static int cfg_port = 8787;
static int rcvbuf; /* Default: autotuning. Can be set with -r <integer> option */
static int sndbuf; /* Default: autotuning. Can be set with -w <integer> option */
static int zflg; /* zero copy option. (MSG_ZEROCOPY for sender, mmap() for receiver */
static int xflg; /* hash received data (simple xor) (-h option) */
static int keepflag; /* -k option: receiver shall keep all received file in memory (no munmap() calls) */
selftests: net: avoid ptl lock contention in tcp_mmap tcp_mmap is used as a reference program for TCP rx zerocopy, so it is important to point out some potential issues. If multiple threads are concurrently using getsockopt(... TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE), there is a chance the low-level mm functions compete on shared ptl lock, if vma are arbitrary placed. Instead of letting the mm layer place the chunks back to back, this patch enforces an alignment so that each thread uses a different ptl lock. Performance measured on a 100 Gbit NIC, with 8 tcp_mmap clients launched at the same time : $ for f in {1..8}; do ./tcp_mmap -H 2002:a05:6608:290:: & done In the following run, we reproduce the old behavior by requesting no alignment : $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) -a 4096 received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 9.69532 s, 28.3516 Gbit cpu usage user:0.08634 sys:3.86258, 120.511 usec per MB, 171839 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 25.4719 s, 10.7914 Gbit cpu usage user:0.055268 sys:21.5633, 659.745 usec per MB, 9065 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.5419 s, 9.63069 Gbit cpu usage user:0.057401 sys:23.8761, 730.392 usec per MB, 14987 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.655 s, 9.59268 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059689 sys:23.8087, 728.406 usec per MB, 18509 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.7808 s, 9.55074 Gbit cpu usage user:0.066042 sys:23.4632, 718.056 usec per MB, 24702 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8259 s, 9.5358 Gbit cpu usage user:0.056547 sys:23.6628, 723.858 usec per MB, 23518 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8808 s, 9.51767 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059357 sys:23.8515, 729.703 usec per MB, 14691 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8879 s, 9.51534 Gbit cpu usage user:0.047115 sys:23.7349, 725.769 usec per MB, 21773 c-switches New behavior (automatic alignment based on Hugepagesize), we can see the system overhead being dramatically reduced. $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 13.5339 s, 20.3103 Gbit cpu usage user:0.122644 sys:3.4125, 107.884 usec per MB, 168567 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 16.0335 s, 17.1439 Gbit cpu usage user:0.132428 sys:3.55752, 112.608 usec per MB, 188557 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 17.5506 s, 15.6621 Gbit cpu usage user:0.155405 sys:3.24889, 103.891 usec per MB, 226652 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 19.1924 s, 14.3222 Gbit cpu usage user:0.135352 sys:3.35583, 106.542 usec per MB, 207404 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.3649 s, 12.2906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.142429 sys:3.53187, 112.131 usec per MB, 250225 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5336 s, 12.1986 Gbit cpu usage user:0.140654 sys:3.61971, 114.757 usec per MB, 253754 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5483 s, 12.1906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.134035 sys:3.55952, 112.718 usec per MB, 252997 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.6442 s, 12.139 Gbit cpu usage user:0.126173 sys:3.71251, 117.147 usec per MB, 253728 c-switches Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-16 09:55:54 +08:00
static size_t chunk_size = 512*1024;
static size_t map_align;
unsigned long htotal;
static inline void prefetch(const void *x)
{
#if defined(__x86_64__)
asm volatile("prefetcht0 %P0" : : "m" (*(const char *)x));
#endif
}
void hash_zone(void *zone, unsigned int length)
{
unsigned long temp = htotal;
while (length >= 8*sizeof(long)) {
prefetch(zone + 384);
temp ^= *(unsigned long *)zone;
temp ^= *(unsigned long *)(zone + sizeof(long));
temp ^= *(unsigned long *)(zone + 2*sizeof(long));
temp ^= *(unsigned long *)(zone + 3*sizeof(long));
temp ^= *(unsigned long *)(zone + 4*sizeof(long));
temp ^= *(unsigned long *)(zone + 5*sizeof(long));
temp ^= *(unsigned long *)(zone + 6*sizeof(long));
temp ^= *(unsigned long *)(zone + 7*sizeof(long));
zone += 8*sizeof(long);
length -= 8*sizeof(long);
}
while (length >= 1) {
temp ^= *(unsigned char *)zone;
zone += 1;
length--;
}
htotal = temp;
}
selftests: net: avoid ptl lock contention in tcp_mmap tcp_mmap is used as a reference program for TCP rx zerocopy, so it is important to point out some potential issues. If multiple threads are concurrently using getsockopt(... TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE), there is a chance the low-level mm functions compete on shared ptl lock, if vma are arbitrary placed. Instead of letting the mm layer place the chunks back to back, this patch enforces an alignment so that each thread uses a different ptl lock. Performance measured on a 100 Gbit NIC, with 8 tcp_mmap clients launched at the same time : $ for f in {1..8}; do ./tcp_mmap -H 2002:a05:6608:290:: & done In the following run, we reproduce the old behavior by requesting no alignment : $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) -a 4096 received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 9.69532 s, 28.3516 Gbit cpu usage user:0.08634 sys:3.86258, 120.511 usec per MB, 171839 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 25.4719 s, 10.7914 Gbit cpu usage user:0.055268 sys:21.5633, 659.745 usec per MB, 9065 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.5419 s, 9.63069 Gbit cpu usage user:0.057401 sys:23.8761, 730.392 usec per MB, 14987 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.655 s, 9.59268 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059689 sys:23.8087, 728.406 usec per MB, 18509 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.7808 s, 9.55074 Gbit cpu usage user:0.066042 sys:23.4632, 718.056 usec per MB, 24702 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8259 s, 9.5358 Gbit cpu usage user:0.056547 sys:23.6628, 723.858 usec per MB, 23518 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8808 s, 9.51767 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059357 sys:23.8515, 729.703 usec per MB, 14691 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8879 s, 9.51534 Gbit cpu usage user:0.047115 sys:23.7349, 725.769 usec per MB, 21773 c-switches New behavior (automatic alignment based on Hugepagesize), we can see the system overhead being dramatically reduced. $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 13.5339 s, 20.3103 Gbit cpu usage user:0.122644 sys:3.4125, 107.884 usec per MB, 168567 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 16.0335 s, 17.1439 Gbit cpu usage user:0.132428 sys:3.55752, 112.608 usec per MB, 188557 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 17.5506 s, 15.6621 Gbit cpu usage user:0.155405 sys:3.24889, 103.891 usec per MB, 226652 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 19.1924 s, 14.3222 Gbit cpu usage user:0.135352 sys:3.35583, 106.542 usec per MB, 207404 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.3649 s, 12.2906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.142429 sys:3.53187, 112.131 usec per MB, 250225 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5336 s, 12.1986 Gbit cpu usage user:0.140654 sys:3.61971, 114.757 usec per MB, 253754 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5483 s, 12.1906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.134035 sys:3.55952, 112.718 usec per MB, 252997 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.6442 s, 12.139 Gbit cpu usage user:0.126173 sys:3.71251, 117.147 usec per MB, 253728 c-switches Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-16 09:55:54 +08:00
#define ALIGN_UP(x, align_to) (((x) + ((align_to)-1)) & ~((align_to)-1))
#define ALIGN_PTR_UP(p, ptr_align_to) ((typeof(p))ALIGN_UP((unsigned long)(p), ptr_align_to))
static void *mmap_large_buffer(size_t need, size_t *allocated)
{
void *buffer;
size_t sz;
/* Attempt to use huge pages if possible. */
sz = ALIGN_UP(need, map_align);
buffer = mmap(NULL, sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_HUGETLB, -1, 0);
if (buffer == (void *)-1) {
sz = need;
buffer = mmap(NULL, sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
if (buffer != (void *)-1)
fprintf(stderr, "MAP_HUGETLB attempt failed, look at /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages for optimal performance\n");
}
*allocated = sz;
return buffer;
}
void *child_thread(void *arg)
{
unsigned long total_mmap = 0, total = 0;
struct tcp_zerocopy_receive zc;
unsigned long delta_usec;
int flags = MAP_SHARED;
struct timeval t0, t1;
char *buffer = NULL;
selftests: net: avoid ptl lock contention in tcp_mmap tcp_mmap is used as a reference program for TCP rx zerocopy, so it is important to point out some potential issues. If multiple threads are concurrently using getsockopt(... TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE), there is a chance the low-level mm functions compete on shared ptl lock, if vma are arbitrary placed. Instead of letting the mm layer place the chunks back to back, this patch enforces an alignment so that each thread uses a different ptl lock. Performance measured on a 100 Gbit NIC, with 8 tcp_mmap clients launched at the same time : $ for f in {1..8}; do ./tcp_mmap -H 2002:a05:6608:290:: & done In the following run, we reproduce the old behavior by requesting no alignment : $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) -a 4096 received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 9.69532 s, 28.3516 Gbit cpu usage user:0.08634 sys:3.86258, 120.511 usec per MB, 171839 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 25.4719 s, 10.7914 Gbit cpu usage user:0.055268 sys:21.5633, 659.745 usec per MB, 9065 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.5419 s, 9.63069 Gbit cpu usage user:0.057401 sys:23.8761, 730.392 usec per MB, 14987 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.655 s, 9.59268 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059689 sys:23.8087, 728.406 usec per MB, 18509 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.7808 s, 9.55074 Gbit cpu usage user:0.066042 sys:23.4632, 718.056 usec per MB, 24702 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8259 s, 9.5358 Gbit cpu usage user:0.056547 sys:23.6628, 723.858 usec per MB, 23518 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8808 s, 9.51767 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059357 sys:23.8515, 729.703 usec per MB, 14691 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8879 s, 9.51534 Gbit cpu usage user:0.047115 sys:23.7349, 725.769 usec per MB, 21773 c-switches New behavior (automatic alignment based on Hugepagesize), we can see the system overhead being dramatically reduced. $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 13.5339 s, 20.3103 Gbit cpu usage user:0.122644 sys:3.4125, 107.884 usec per MB, 168567 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 16.0335 s, 17.1439 Gbit cpu usage user:0.132428 sys:3.55752, 112.608 usec per MB, 188557 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 17.5506 s, 15.6621 Gbit cpu usage user:0.155405 sys:3.24889, 103.891 usec per MB, 226652 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 19.1924 s, 14.3222 Gbit cpu usage user:0.135352 sys:3.35583, 106.542 usec per MB, 207404 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.3649 s, 12.2906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.142429 sys:3.53187, 112.131 usec per MB, 250225 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5336 s, 12.1986 Gbit cpu usage user:0.140654 sys:3.61971, 114.757 usec per MB, 253754 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5483 s, 12.1906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.134035 sys:3.55952, 112.718 usec per MB, 252997 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.6442 s, 12.139 Gbit cpu usage user:0.126173 sys:3.71251, 117.147 usec per MB, 253728 c-switches Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-16 09:55:54 +08:00
void *raddr = NULL;
void *addr = NULL;
double throughput;
struct rusage ru;
size_t buffer_sz;
int lu, fd;
fd = (int)(unsigned long)arg;
gettimeofday(&t0, NULL);
fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NDELAY);
buffer = mmap_large_buffer(chunk_size, &buffer_sz);
if (buffer == (void *)-1) {
perror("mmap");
goto error;
}
if (zflg) {
selftests: net: avoid ptl lock contention in tcp_mmap tcp_mmap is used as a reference program for TCP rx zerocopy, so it is important to point out some potential issues. If multiple threads are concurrently using getsockopt(... TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE), there is a chance the low-level mm functions compete on shared ptl lock, if vma are arbitrary placed. Instead of letting the mm layer place the chunks back to back, this patch enforces an alignment so that each thread uses a different ptl lock. Performance measured on a 100 Gbit NIC, with 8 tcp_mmap clients launched at the same time : $ for f in {1..8}; do ./tcp_mmap -H 2002:a05:6608:290:: & done In the following run, we reproduce the old behavior by requesting no alignment : $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) -a 4096 received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 9.69532 s, 28.3516 Gbit cpu usage user:0.08634 sys:3.86258, 120.511 usec per MB, 171839 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 25.4719 s, 10.7914 Gbit cpu usage user:0.055268 sys:21.5633, 659.745 usec per MB, 9065 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.5419 s, 9.63069 Gbit cpu usage user:0.057401 sys:23.8761, 730.392 usec per MB, 14987 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.655 s, 9.59268 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059689 sys:23.8087, 728.406 usec per MB, 18509 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.7808 s, 9.55074 Gbit cpu usage user:0.066042 sys:23.4632, 718.056 usec per MB, 24702 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8259 s, 9.5358 Gbit cpu usage user:0.056547 sys:23.6628, 723.858 usec per MB, 23518 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8808 s, 9.51767 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059357 sys:23.8515, 729.703 usec per MB, 14691 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8879 s, 9.51534 Gbit cpu usage user:0.047115 sys:23.7349, 725.769 usec per MB, 21773 c-switches New behavior (automatic alignment based on Hugepagesize), we can see the system overhead being dramatically reduced. $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 13.5339 s, 20.3103 Gbit cpu usage user:0.122644 sys:3.4125, 107.884 usec per MB, 168567 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 16.0335 s, 17.1439 Gbit cpu usage user:0.132428 sys:3.55752, 112.608 usec per MB, 188557 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 17.5506 s, 15.6621 Gbit cpu usage user:0.155405 sys:3.24889, 103.891 usec per MB, 226652 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 19.1924 s, 14.3222 Gbit cpu usage user:0.135352 sys:3.35583, 106.542 usec per MB, 207404 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.3649 s, 12.2906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.142429 sys:3.53187, 112.131 usec per MB, 250225 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5336 s, 12.1986 Gbit cpu usage user:0.140654 sys:3.61971, 114.757 usec per MB, 253754 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5483 s, 12.1906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.134035 sys:3.55952, 112.718 usec per MB, 252997 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.6442 s, 12.139 Gbit cpu usage user:0.126173 sys:3.71251, 117.147 usec per MB, 253728 c-switches Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-16 09:55:54 +08:00
raddr = mmap(NULL, chunk_size + map_align, PROT_READ, flags, fd, 0);
if (raddr == (void *)-1) {
perror("mmap");
zflg = 0;
selftests: net: avoid ptl lock contention in tcp_mmap tcp_mmap is used as a reference program for TCP rx zerocopy, so it is important to point out some potential issues. If multiple threads are concurrently using getsockopt(... TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE), there is a chance the low-level mm functions compete on shared ptl lock, if vma are arbitrary placed. Instead of letting the mm layer place the chunks back to back, this patch enforces an alignment so that each thread uses a different ptl lock. Performance measured on a 100 Gbit NIC, with 8 tcp_mmap clients launched at the same time : $ for f in {1..8}; do ./tcp_mmap -H 2002:a05:6608:290:: & done In the following run, we reproduce the old behavior by requesting no alignment : $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) -a 4096 received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 9.69532 s, 28.3516 Gbit cpu usage user:0.08634 sys:3.86258, 120.511 usec per MB, 171839 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 25.4719 s, 10.7914 Gbit cpu usage user:0.055268 sys:21.5633, 659.745 usec per MB, 9065 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.5419 s, 9.63069 Gbit cpu usage user:0.057401 sys:23.8761, 730.392 usec per MB, 14987 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.655 s, 9.59268 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059689 sys:23.8087, 728.406 usec per MB, 18509 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.7808 s, 9.55074 Gbit cpu usage user:0.066042 sys:23.4632, 718.056 usec per MB, 24702 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8259 s, 9.5358 Gbit cpu usage user:0.056547 sys:23.6628, 723.858 usec per MB, 23518 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8808 s, 9.51767 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059357 sys:23.8515, 729.703 usec per MB, 14691 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8879 s, 9.51534 Gbit cpu usage user:0.047115 sys:23.7349, 725.769 usec per MB, 21773 c-switches New behavior (automatic alignment based on Hugepagesize), we can see the system overhead being dramatically reduced. $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 13.5339 s, 20.3103 Gbit cpu usage user:0.122644 sys:3.4125, 107.884 usec per MB, 168567 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 16.0335 s, 17.1439 Gbit cpu usage user:0.132428 sys:3.55752, 112.608 usec per MB, 188557 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 17.5506 s, 15.6621 Gbit cpu usage user:0.155405 sys:3.24889, 103.891 usec per MB, 226652 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 19.1924 s, 14.3222 Gbit cpu usage user:0.135352 sys:3.35583, 106.542 usec per MB, 207404 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.3649 s, 12.2906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.142429 sys:3.53187, 112.131 usec per MB, 250225 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5336 s, 12.1986 Gbit cpu usage user:0.140654 sys:3.61971, 114.757 usec per MB, 253754 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5483 s, 12.1906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.134035 sys:3.55952, 112.718 usec per MB, 252997 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.6442 s, 12.139 Gbit cpu usage user:0.126173 sys:3.71251, 117.147 usec per MB, 253728 c-switches Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-16 09:55:54 +08:00
} else {
addr = ALIGN_PTR_UP(raddr, map_align);
}
}
while (1) {
struct pollfd pfd = { .fd = fd, .events = POLLIN, };
int sub;
poll(&pfd, 1, 10000);
if (zflg) {
socklen_t zc_len = sizeof(zc);
int res;
memset(&zc, 0, sizeof(zc));
zc.address = (__u64)((unsigned long)addr);
zc.length = chunk_size;
res = getsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE,
&zc, &zc_len);
if (res == -1)
break;
if (zc.length) {
assert(zc.length <= chunk_size);
total_mmap += zc.length;
if (xflg)
hash_zone(addr, zc.length);
/* It is more efficient to unmap the pages right now,
* instead of doing this in next TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE.
*/
madvise(addr, zc.length, MADV_DONTNEED);
total += zc.length;
}
if (zc.recv_skip_hint) {
assert(zc.recv_skip_hint <= chunk_size);
lu = read(fd, buffer, zc.recv_skip_hint);
if (lu > 0) {
if (xflg)
hash_zone(buffer, lu);
total += lu;
}
}
continue;
}
sub = 0;
while (sub < chunk_size) {
lu = read(fd, buffer + sub, chunk_size - sub);
if (lu == 0)
goto end;
if (lu < 0)
break;
if (xflg)
hash_zone(buffer + sub, lu);
total += lu;
sub += lu;
}
}
end:
gettimeofday(&t1, NULL);
delta_usec = (t1.tv_sec - t0.tv_sec) * 1000000 + t1.tv_usec - t0.tv_usec;
throughput = 0;
if (delta_usec)
throughput = total * 8.0 / (double)delta_usec / 1000.0;
getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD, &ru);
if (total > 1024*1024) {
unsigned long total_usec;
unsigned long mb = total >> 20;
total_usec = 1000000*ru.ru_utime.tv_sec + ru.ru_utime.tv_usec +
1000000*ru.ru_stime.tv_sec + ru.ru_stime.tv_usec;
printf("received %lg MB (%lg %% mmap'ed) in %lg s, %lg Gbit\n"
" cpu usage user:%lg sys:%lg, %lg usec per MB, %lu c-switches\n",
total / (1024.0 * 1024.0),
100.0*total_mmap/total,
(double)delta_usec / 1000000.0,
throughput,
(double)ru.ru_utime.tv_sec + (double)ru.ru_utime.tv_usec / 1000000.0,
(double)ru.ru_stime.tv_sec + (double)ru.ru_stime.tv_usec / 1000000.0,
(double)total_usec/mb,
ru.ru_nvcsw);
}
error:
munmap(buffer, buffer_sz);
close(fd);
if (zflg)
selftests: net: avoid ptl lock contention in tcp_mmap tcp_mmap is used as a reference program for TCP rx zerocopy, so it is important to point out some potential issues. If multiple threads are concurrently using getsockopt(... TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE), there is a chance the low-level mm functions compete on shared ptl lock, if vma are arbitrary placed. Instead of letting the mm layer place the chunks back to back, this patch enforces an alignment so that each thread uses a different ptl lock. Performance measured on a 100 Gbit NIC, with 8 tcp_mmap clients launched at the same time : $ for f in {1..8}; do ./tcp_mmap -H 2002:a05:6608:290:: & done In the following run, we reproduce the old behavior by requesting no alignment : $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) -a 4096 received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 9.69532 s, 28.3516 Gbit cpu usage user:0.08634 sys:3.86258, 120.511 usec per MB, 171839 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 25.4719 s, 10.7914 Gbit cpu usage user:0.055268 sys:21.5633, 659.745 usec per MB, 9065 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.5419 s, 9.63069 Gbit cpu usage user:0.057401 sys:23.8761, 730.392 usec per MB, 14987 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.655 s, 9.59268 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059689 sys:23.8087, 728.406 usec per MB, 18509 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.7808 s, 9.55074 Gbit cpu usage user:0.066042 sys:23.4632, 718.056 usec per MB, 24702 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8259 s, 9.5358 Gbit cpu usage user:0.056547 sys:23.6628, 723.858 usec per MB, 23518 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8808 s, 9.51767 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059357 sys:23.8515, 729.703 usec per MB, 14691 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8879 s, 9.51534 Gbit cpu usage user:0.047115 sys:23.7349, 725.769 usec per MB, 21773 c-switches New behavior (automatic alignment based on Hugepagesize), we can see the system overhead being dramatically reduced. $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 13.5339 s, 20.3103 Gbit cpu usage user:0.122644 sys:3.4125, 107.884 usec per MB, 168567 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 16.0335 s, 17.1439 Gbit cpu usage user:0.132428 sys:3.55752, 112.608 usec per MB, 188557 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 17.5506 s, 15.6621 Gbit cpu usage user:0.155405 sys:3.24889, 103.891 usec per MB, 226652 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 19.1924 s, 14.3222 Gbit cpu usage user:0.135352 sys:3.35583, 106.542 usec per MB, 207404 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.3649 s, 12.2906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.142429 sys:3.53187, 112.131 usec per MB, 250225 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5336 s, 12.1986 Gbit cpu usage user:0.140654 sys:3.61971, 114.757 usec per MB, 253754 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5483 s, 12.1906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.134035 sys:3.55952, 112.718 usec per MB, 252997 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.6442 s, 12.139 Gbit cpu usage user:0.126173 sys:3.71251, 117.147 usec per MB, 253728 c-switches Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-16 09:55:54 +08:00
munmap(raddr, chunk_size + map_align);
pthread_exit(0);
}
static void apply_rcvsnd_buf(int fd)
{
if (rcvbuf && setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET,
SO_RCVBUF, &rcvbuf, sizeof(rcvbuf)) == -1) {
perror("setsockopt SO_RCVBUF");
}
if (sndbuf && setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET,
SO_SNDBUF, &sndbuf, sizeof(sndbuf)) == -1) {
perror("setsockopt SO_SNDBUF");
}
}
static void setup_sockaddr(int domain, const char *str_addr,
struct sockaddr_storage *sockaddr)
{
struct sockaddr_in6 *addr6 = (void *) sockaddr;
struct sockaddr_in *addr4 = (void *) sockaddr;
switch (domain) {
case PF_INET:
memset(addr4, 0, sizeof(*addr4));
addr4->sin_family = AF_INET;
addr4->sin_port = htons(cfg_port);
if (str_addr &&
inet_pton(AF_INET, str_addr, &(addr4->sin_addr)) != 1)
error(1, 0, "ipv4 parse error: %s", str_addr);
break;
case PF_INET6:
memset(addr6, 0, sizeof(*addr6));
addr6->sin6_family = AF_INET6;
addr6->sin6_port = htons(cfg_port);
if (str_addr &&
inet_pton(AF_INET6, str_addr, &(addr6->sin6_addr)) != 1)
error(1, 0, "ipv6 parse error: %s", str_addr);
break;
default:
error(1, 0, "illegal domain");
}
}
static void do_accept(int fdlisten)
{
pthread_attr_t attr;
int rcvlowat;
pthread_attr_init(&attr);
pthread_attr_setdetachstate(&attr, PTHREAD_CREATE_DETACHED);
rcvlowat = chunk_size;
if (setsockopt(fdlisten, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVLOWAT,
&rcvlowat, sizeof(rcvlowat)) == -1) {
perror("setsockopt SO_RCVLOWAT");
}
apply_rcvsnd_buf(fdlisten);
while (1) {
struct sockaddr_in addr;
socklen_t addrlen = sizeof(addr);
pthread_t th;
int fd, res;
fd = accept(fdlisten, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, &addrlen);
if (fd == -1) {
perror("accept");
continue;
}
res = pthread_create(&th, &attr, child_thread,
(void *)(unsigned long)fd);
if (res) {
errno = res;
perror("pthread_create");
close(fd);
}
}
}
selftests: net: avoid ptl lock contention in tcp_mmap tcp_mmap is used as a reference program for TCP rx zerocopy, so it is important to point out some potential issues. If multiple threads are concurrently using getsockopt(... TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE), there is a chance the low-level mm functions compete on shared ptl lock, if vma are arbitrary placed. Instead of letting the mm layer place the chunks back to back, this patch enforces an alignment so that each thread uses a different ptl lock. Performance measured on a 100 Gbit NIC, with 8 tcp_mmap clients launched at the same time : $ for f in {1..8}; do ./tcp_mmap -H 2002:a05:6608:290:: & done In the following run, we reproduce the old behavior by requesting no alignment : $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) -a 4096 received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 9.69532 s, 28.3516 Gbit cpu usage user:0.08634 sys:3.86258, 120.511 usec per MB, 171839 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 25.4719 s, 10.7914 Gbit cpu usage user:0.055268 sys:21.5633, 659.745 usec per MB, 9065 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.5419 s, 9.63069 Gbit cpu usage user:0.057401 sys:23.8761, 730.392 usec per MB, 14987 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.655 s, 9.59268 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059689 sys:23.8087, 728.406 usec per MB, 18509 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.7808 s, 9.55074 Gbit cpu usage user:0.066042 sys:23.4632, 718.056 usec per MB, 24702 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8259 s, 9.5358 Gbit cpu usage user:0.056547 sys:23.6628, 723.858 usec per MB, 23518 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8808 s, 9.51767 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059357 sys:23.8515, 729.703 usec per MB, 14691 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8879 s, 9.51534 Gbit cpu usage user:0.047115 sys:23.7349, 725.769 usec per MB, 21773 c-switches New behavior (automatic alignment based on Hugepagesize), we can see the system overhead being dramatically reduced. $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 13.5339 s, 20.3103 Gbit cpu usage user:0.122644 sys:3.4125, 107.884 usec per MB, 168567 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 16.0335 s, 17.1439 Gbit cpu usage user:0.132428 sys:3.55752, 112.608 usec per MB, 188557 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 17.5506 s, 15.6621 Gbit cpu usage user:0.155405 sys:3.24889, 103.891 usec per MB, 226652 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 19.1924 s, 14.3222 Gbit cpu usage user:0.135352 sys:3.35583, 106.542 usec per MB, 207404 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.3649 s, 12.2906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.142429 sys:3.53187, 112.131 usec per MB, 250225 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5336 s, 12.1986 Gbit cpu usage user:0.140654 sys:3.61971, 114.757 usec per MB, 253754 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5483 s, 12.1906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.134035 sys:3.55952, 112.718 usec per MB, 252997 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.6442 s, 12.139 Gbit cpu usage user:0.126173 sys:3.71251, 117.147 usec per MB, 253728 c-switches Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-16 09:55:54 +08:00
/* Each thread should reserve a big enough vma to avoid
* spinlock collisions in ptl locks.
* This size is 2MB on x86_64, and is exported in /proc/meminfo.
*/
static unsigned long default_huge_page_size(void)
{
FILE *f = fopen("/proc/meminfo", "r");
unsigned long hps = 0;
size_t linelen = 0;
char *line = NULL;
if (!f)
return 0;
while (getline(&line, &linelen, f) > 0) {
if (sscanf(line, "Hugepagesize: %lu kB", &hps) == 1) {
hps <<= 10;
break;
}
}
free(line);
fclose(f);
return hps;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct sockaddr_storage listenaddr, addr;
unsigned int max_pacing_rate = 0;
uint64_t total = 0;
char *host = NULL;
int fd, c, on = 1;
size_t buffer_sz;
char *buffer;
int sflg = 0;
int mss = 0;
selftests: net: avoid ptl lock contention in tcp_mmap tcp_mmap is used as a reference program for TCP rx zerocopy, so it is important to point out some potential issues. If multiple threads are concurrently using getsockopt(... TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE), there is a chance the low-level mm functions compete on shared ptl lock, if vma are arbitrary placed. Instead of letting the mm layer place the chunks back to back, this patch enforces an alignment so that each thread uses a different ptl lock. Performance measured on a 100 Gbit NIC, with 8 tcp_mmap clients launched at the same time : $ for f in {1..8}; do ./tcp_mmap -H 2002:a05:6608:290:: & done In the following run, we reproduce the old behavior by requesting no alignment : $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) -a 4096 received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 9.69532 s, 28.3516 Gbit cpu usage user:0.08634 sys:3.86258, 120.511 usec per MB, 171839 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 25.4719 s, 10.7914 Gbit cpu usage user:0.055268 sys:21.5633, 659.745 usec per MB, 9065 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.5419 s, 9.63069 Gbit cpu usage user:0.057401 sys:23.8761, 730.392 usec per MB, 14987 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.655 s, 9.59268 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059689 sys:23.8087, 728.406 usec per MB, 18509 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.7808 s, 9.55074 Gbit cpu usage user:0.066042 sys:23.4632, 718.056 usec per MB, 24702 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8259 s, 9.5358 Gbit cpu usage user:0.056547 sys:23.6628, 723.858 usec per MB, 23518 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8808 s, 9.51767 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059357 sys:23.8515, 729.703 usec per MB, 14691 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8879 s, 9.51534 Gbit cpu usage user:0.047115 sys:23.7349, 725.769 usec per MB, 21773 c-switches New behavior (automatic alignment based on Hugepagesize), we can see the system overhead being dramatically reduced. $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 13.5339 s, 20.3103 Gbit cpu usage user:0.122644 sys:3.4125, 107.884 usec per MB, 168567 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 16.0335 s, 17.1439 Gbit cpu usage user:0.132428 sys:3.55752, 112.608 usec per MB, 188557 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 17.5506 s, 15.6621 Gbit cpu usage user:0.155405 sys:3.24889, 103.891 usec per MB, 226652 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 19.1924 s, 14.3222 Gbit cpu usage user:0.135352 sys:3.35583, 106.542 usec per MB, 207404 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.3649 s, 12.2906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.142429 sys:3.53187, 112.131 usec per MB, 250225 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5336 s, 12.1986 Gbit cpu usage user:0.140654 sys:3.61971, 114.757 usec per MB, 253754 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5483 s, 12.1906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.134035 sys:3.55952, 112.718 usec per MB, 252997 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.6442 s, 12.139 Gbit cpu usage user:0.126173 sys:3.71251, 117.147 usec per MB, 253728 c-switches Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-16 09:55:54 +08:00
while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "46p:svr:w:H:zxkP:M:C:a:")) != -1) {
switch (c) {
case '4':
cfg_family = PF_INET;
cfg_alen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
break;
case '6':
cfg_family = PF_INET6;
cfg_alen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6);
break;
case 'p':
cfg_port = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'H':
host = optarg;
break;
case 's': /* server : listen for incoming connections */
sflg++;
break;
case 'r':
rcvbuf = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'w':
sndbuf = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'z':
zflg = 1;
break;
case 'M':
mss = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'x':
xflg = 1;
break;
case 'k':
keepflag = 1;
break;
case 'P':
max_pacing_rate = atoi(optarg) ;
break;
selftests: net: avoid ptl lock contention in tcp_mmap tcp_mmap is used as a reference program for TCP rx zerocopy, so it is important to point out some potential issues. If multiple threads are concurrently using getsockopt(... TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE), there is a chance the low-level mm functions compete on shared ptl lock, if vma are arbitrary placed. Instead of letting the mm layer place the chunks back to back, this patch enforces an alignment so that each thread uses a different ptl lock. Performance measured on a 100 Gbit NIC, with 8 tcp_mmap clients launched at the same time : $ for f in {1..8}; do ./tcp_mmap -H 2002:a05:6608:290:: & done In the following run, we reproduce the old behavior by requesting no alignment : $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) -a 4096 received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 9.69532 s, 28.3516 Gbit cpu usage user:0.08634 sys:3.86258, 120.511 usec per MB, 171839 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 25.4719 s, 10.7914 Gbit cpu usage user:0.055268 sys:21.5633, 659.745 usec per MB, 9065 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.5419 s, 9.63069 Gbit cpu usage user:0.057401 sys:23.8761, 730.392 usec per MB, 14987 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.655 s, 9.59268 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059689 sys:23.8087, 728.406 usec per MB, 18509 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.7808 s, 9.55074 Gbit cpu usage user:0.066042 sys:23.4632, 718.056 usec per MB, 24702 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8259 s, 9.5358 Gbit cpu usage user:0.056547 sys:23.6628, 723.858 usec per MB, 23518 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8808 s, 9.51767 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059357 sys:23.8515, 729.703 usec per MB, 14691 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8879 s, 9.51534 Gbit cpu usage user:0.047115 sys:23.7349, 725.769 usec per MB, 21773 c-switches New behavior (automatic alignment based on Hugepagesize), we can see the system overhead being dramatically reduced. $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 13.5339 s, 20.3103 Gbit cpu usage user:0.122644 sys:3.4125, 107.884 usec per MB, 168567 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 16.0335 s, 17.1439 Gbit cpu usage user:0.132428 sys:3.55752, 112.608 usec per MB, 188557 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 17.5506 s, 15.6621 Gbit cpu usage user:0.155405 sys:3.24889, 103.891 usec per MB, 226652 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 19.1924 s, 14.3222 Gbit cpu usage user:0.135352 sys:3.35583, 106.542 usec per MB, 207404 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.3649 s, 12.2906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.142429 sys:3.53187, 112.131 usec per MB, 250225 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5336 s, 12.1986 Gbit cpu usage user:0.140654 sys:3.61971, 114.757 usec per MB, 253754 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5483 s, 12.1906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.134035 sys:3.55952, 112.718 usec per MB, 252997 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.6442 s, 12.139 Gbit cpu usage user:0.126173 sys:3.71251, 117.147 usec per MB, 253728 c-switches Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-16 09:55:54 +08:00
case 'C':
chunk_size = atol(optarg);
break;
case 'a':
map_align = atol(optarg);
break;
default:
exit(1);
}
}
selftests: net: avoid ptl lock contention in tcp_mmap tcp_mmap is used as a reference program for TCP rx zerocopy, so it is important to point out some potential issues. If multiple threads are concurrently using getsockopt(... TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE), there is a chance the low-level mm functions compete on shared ptl lock, if vma are arbitrary placed. Instead of letting the mm layer place the chunks back to back, this patch enforces an alignment so that each thread uses a different ptl lock. Performance measured on a 100 Gbit NIC, with 8 tcp_mmap clients launched at the same time : $ for f in {1..8}; do ./tcp_mmap -H 2002:a05:6608:290:: & done In the following run, we reproduce the old behavior by requesting no alignment : $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) -a 4096 received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 9.69532 s, 28.3516 Gbit cpu usage user:0.08634 sys:3.86258, 120.511 usec per MB, 171839 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 25.4719 s, 10.7914 Gbit cpu usage user:0.055268 sys:21.5633, 659.745 usec per MB, 9065 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.5419 s, 9.63069 Gbit cpu usage user:0.057401 sys:23.8761, 730.392 usec per MB, 14987 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.655 s, 9.59268 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059689 sys:23.8087, 728.406 usec per MB, 18509 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.7808 s, 9.55074 Gbit cpu usage user:0.066042 sys:23.4632, 718.056 usec per MB, 24702 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8259 s, 9.5358 Gbit cpu usage user:0.056547 sys:23.6628, 723.858 usec per MB, 23518 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8808 s, 9.51767 Gbit cpu usage user:0.059357 sys:23.8515, 729.703 usec per MB, 14691 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 28.8879 s, 9.51534 Gbit cpu usage user:0.047115 sys:23.7349, 725.769 usec per MB, 21773 c-switches New behavior (automatic alignment based on Hugepagesize), we can see the system overhead being dramatically reduced. $ tcp_mmap -sz -C $((128*1024)) received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 13.5339 s, 20.3103 Gbit cpu usage user:0.122644 sys:3.4125, 107.884 usec per MB, 168567 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 16.0335 s, 17.1439 Gbit cpu usage user:0.132428 sys:3.55752, 112.608 usec per MB, 188557 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 17.5506 s, 15.6621 Gbit cpu usage user:0.155405 sys:3.24889, 103.891 usec per MB, 226652 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 19.1924 s, 14.3222 Gbit cpu usage user:0.135352 sys:3.35583, 106.542 usec per MB, 207404 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.3649 s, 12.2906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.142429 sys:3.53187, 112.131 usec per MB, 250225 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5336 s, 12.1986 Gbit cpu usage user:0.140654 sys:3.61971, 114.757 usec per MB, 253754 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.5483 s, 12.1906 Gbit cpu usage user:0.134035 sys:3.55952, 112.718 usec per MB, 252997 c-switches received 32768 MB (100 % mmap'ed) in 22.6442 s, 12.139 Gbit cpu usage user:0.126173 sys:3.71251, 117.147 usec per MB, 253728 c-switches Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Cc: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-16 09:55:54 +08:00
if (!map_align) {
map_align = default_huge_page_size();
/* if really /proc/meminfo is not helping,
* we use the default x86_64 hugepagesize.
*/
if (!map_align)
map_align = 2*1024*1024;
}
if (sflg) {
int fdlisten = socket(cfg_family, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
if (fdlisten == -1) {
perror("socket");
exit(1);
}
apply_rcvsnd_buf(fdlisten);
setsockopt(fdlisten, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &on, sizeof(on));
setup_sockaddr(cfg_family, host, &listenaddr);
if (mss &&
setsockopt(fdlisten, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_MAXSEG,
&mss, sizeof(mss)) == -1) {
perror("setsockopt TCP_MAXSEG");
exit(1);
}
if (bind(fdlisten, (const struct sockaddr *)&listenaddr, cfg_alen) == -1) {
perror("bind");
exit(1);
}
if (listen(fdlisten, 128) == -1) {
perror("listen");
exit(1);
}
do_accept(fdlisten);
}
buffer = mmap_large_buffer(chunk_size, &buffer_sz);
if (buffer == (char *)-1) {
perror("mmap");
exit(1);
}
fd = socket(cfg_family, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
if (fd == -1) {
perror("socket");
exit(1);
}
apply_rcvsnd_buf(fd);
setup_sockaddr(cfg_family, host, &addr);
if (mss &&
setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_MAXSEG, &mss, sizeof(mss)) == -1) {
perror("setsockopt TCP_MAXSEG");
exit(1);
}
if (connect(fd, (const struct sockaddr *)&addr, cfg_alen) == -1) {
perror("connect");
exit(1);
}
if (max_pacing_rate &&
setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_MAX_PACING_RATE,
&max_pacing_rate, sizeof(max_pacing_rate)) == -1)
perror("setsockopt SO_MAX_PACING_RATE");
if (zflg && setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ZEROCOPY,
&on, sizeof(on)) == -1) {
perror("setsockopt SO_ZEROCOPY, (-z option disabled)");
zflg = 0;
}
while (total < FILE_SZ) {
int64_t wr = FILE_SZ - total;
if (wr > chunk_size)
wr = chunk_size;
/* Note : we just want to fill the pipe with 0 bytes */
wr = send(fd, buffer, (size_t)wr, zflg ? MSG_ZEROCOPY : 0);
if (wr <= 0)
break;
total += wr;
}
close(fd);
munmap(buffer, buffer_sz);
return 0;
}