linux/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c

327 lines
8.6 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* OMAP4 specific common source file.
*
* Copyright (C) 2010 Texas Instruments, Inc.
* Author:
* Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
*
*
* This program is free software,you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
ARM: OMAP4: Fix errata i688 with MPU interconnect barriers. On OMAP4 SOC, intecronnects has many write buffers in the async bridges and they need to be drained before CPU enters into standby state. Patch 'OMAP4: PM: Add CPUX OFF mode support' added CPU PM support but OMAP errata i688 (Async Bridge Corruption) needs to be taken care to avoid issues like system freeze, CPU deadlocks, random crashes with register accesses, synchronisation loss on initiators operating on both interconnect port simultaneously. As per the errata, if a data is stalled inside asynchronous bridge because of back pressure, it may be accepted multiple times, creating pointer misalignment that will corrupt next transfers on that data path until next reset of the system (No recovery procedure once the issue is hit, the path remains consistently broken). Async bridge can be found on path between MPU to EMIF and MPU to L3 interconnect. This situation can happen only when the idle is initiated by a Master Request Disconnection (which is trigged by software when executing WFI on CPU). The work-around for this errata needs all the initiators connected through async bridge must ensure that data path is properly drained before issuing WFI. This condition will be met if one Strongly ordered access is performed to the target right before executing the WFI. In MPU case, L3 T2ASYNC FIFO and DDR T2ASYNC FIFO needs to be drained. IO barrier ensure that there is no synchronisation loss on initiators operating on both interconnect port simultaneously. Thanks to Russell for a tip to conver assembly function to C fuction there by reducing 40 odd lines of code from the patch. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com> Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Tested-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-06-26 09:04:31 +08:00
#include <linux/memblock.h>
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/genalloc.h>
#include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h>
ARM: OMAP4: Fix errata i688 with MPU interconnect barriers. On OMAP4 SOC, intecronnects has many write buffers in the async bridges and they need to be drained before CPU enters into standby state. Patch 'OMAP4: PM: Add CPUX OFF mode support' added CPU PM support but OMAP errata i688 (Async Bridge Corruption) needs to be taken care to avoid issues like system freeze, CPU deadlocks, random crashes with register accesses, synchronisation loss on initiators operating on both interconnect port simultaneously. As per the errata, if a data is stalled inside asynchronous bridge because of back pressure, it may be accepted multiple times, creating pointer misalignment that will corrupt next transfers on that data path until next reset of the system (No recovery procedure once the issue is hit, the path remains consistently broken). Async bridge can be found on path between MPU to EMIF and MPU to L3 interconnect. This situation can happen only when the idle is initiated by a Master Request Disconnection (which is trigged by software when executing WFI on CPU). The work-around for this errata needs all the initiators connected through async bridge must ensure that data path is properly drained before issuing WFI. This condition will be met if one Strongly ordered access is performed to the target right before executing the WFI. In MPU case, L3 T2ASYNC FIFO and DDR T2ASYNC FIFO needs to be drained. IO barrier ensure that there is no synchronisation loss on initiators operating on both interconnect port simultaneously. Thanks to Russell for a tip to conver assembly function to C fuction there by reducing 40 odd lines of code from the patch. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com> Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Tested-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-06-26 09:04:31 +08:00
#include <asm/mach/map.h>
#include <asm/memblock.h>
#include <asm/smp_twd.h>
#include "omap-wakeupgen.h"
ARM: OMAP: Split plat/hardware.h, use local soc.h for omap2+ As the plat and mach includes need to disappear for single zImage work, we need to remove plat/hardware.h. Do this by splitting plat/hardware.h into omap1 and omap2+ specific files. The old plat/hardware.h already has omap1 only defines, so it gets moved to mach/hardware.h for omap1. For omap2+, we use the local soc.h that for now just includes the related SoC headers to keep this patch more readable. Note that the local soc.h still includes plat/cpu.h that can be dealt with in later patches. Let's also include plat/serial.h from common.h for all the board-*.c files. This allows making the include files local later on without patching these files again. Note that only minimal changes are done in this patch for the drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c driver to keep things compiling. Further patches are needed to eventually remove cpu_is_omap usage in the drivers. Also only minimal changes are done to sound/soc/omap/* to remove the unneeded includes and to define OMAP44XX_MCPDM_L3_BASE locally so there's no need to include omap44xx.h. While at it, also sort some of the includes in the standard way. Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com> Acked-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
2012-09-01 01:59:07 +08:00
#include "soc.h"
#include "iomap.h"
#include "common.h"
#include "prminst44xx.h"
#include "prcm_mpu44xx.h"
#include "omap4-sar-layout.h"
#include "omap-secure.h"
#include "sram.h"
#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0
static void __iomem *l2cache_base;
#endif
static void __iomem *sar_ram_base;
ARM: OMAP4460: Workaround for ROM bug because of CA9 r2pX GIC control register change. On OMAP4+ devices, GIC register context is lost when MPUSS hits the OSWR(Open Switch Retention). On the CPU wakeup path, ROM code gets executed and one of the steps in it is to restore the saved context of the GIC. The ROM Code GIC distributor restoration is split in two parts: CPU specific register done by each CPU and common register done by only one CPU. Below is the abstract flow. ............................................................... - MPUSS in OSWR state. - CPU0 wakes up on the event(interrupt) and start executing ROM code. [..] - CPU0 executes "GIC Restoration:" [...] - CPU0 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code. [...] - CPU0 is online in OS - CPU0 enables the GIC distributor. GICD.Enable Non-secure = 1 - CPU0 wakes up CPU1 with clock-domain force wakeup method. - CPU0 continues it's execution. [..] - CPU1 wakes up and start executing ROM code. [..] - CPU1 executes "GIC Restoration:" [..] - CPU1 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code. [...] - CPU1 is online in OS and start executing. [...] - GIC Restoration: /* Common routine for HS and GP devices */ { if (GICD != 1) { /* This will be true in OSWR state */ if (GIC_SAR_BACKUP_STATE == SAVED) - CPU restores GIC distributor else - reconfigure GIC distributor to boot values. GICD.Enable secure = 1 } if (GIC_SAR_BACKUP_STATE == SAVED) - CPU restore its GIC CPU interface registers if saved. else - reconfigure its GIC CPU interface registers to boot values. } ............................................................... So as mentioned in the flow, GICD != 1 condition decides how the GIC registers are handled in ROM code wakeup path from OSWR. As evident from the flow, ROM code relies on the entire GICD register value and not specific register bits. The assumption was valid till CortexA9 r1pX version since there was only one banked bit to control secure and non-secure GICD. Secure view which ROM code sees: bit 0 == Enable Non-secure Non-secure view which HLOS sees: bit 0 == Enable secure But GICD register has changed between CortexA9 r1pX and r2pX. On r2pX GICD register is composed of 2 bits. Secure view which ROM code sees: bit 1 == Enable Non-secure bit 0 == Enable secure Non-secure view which HLOS sees: bit 0 == Enable Non-secure Hence on OMAP4460(r2pX) devices, if you go through the above flow again during CPU1 wakeup, GICD == 3 and hence ROM code fails to understand the real wakeup power state and reconfigures GIC distributor to boot values. This is nasty since you loose the entire interrupt controller context in a live system. The ROM code fix done on next OMAP4 device (OMAP4470 - r2px) is to check "GICD.Enable secure != 1" for GIC restoration in OSWR wakeup path. Since ROM code can't be fixed on OMAP4460 devices, a work around needs to be implemented. As evident from the flow, as long as CPU1 sees GICD == 1 in it's wakeup path from OSWR, the issue won't happen. Below is the flow with the work-around. ............................................................... - MPUSS in OSWR state. - CPU0 wakes up on the event(interrupt) and start executing ROM code. [..] - CPU0 executes "GIC Restoration:" [..] - CPU0 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code. [..] - CPU0 is online in OS. - CPU0 does GICD.Enable Non-secure = 0 - CPU0 wakes up CPU1 with clock domain force wakeup method. - CPU0 waits for GICD.Enable Non-secure = 1 - CPU0 coninues it's execution. [..] - CPU1 wakes up and start executing ROM code. [..] - CPU1 executes "GIC Restoration:" [..] - CPU1 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code. [..] - CPU1 is online in OS - CPU1 does GICD.Enable Non-secure = 1 - CPU1 start executing [...] ............................................................... With this procedure, the GIC configuration done between the CPU0 wakeup and CPU1 wakeup will not be lost but during this short windows, the CPU0 will not receive interrupts. The BUG is applicable to only OMAP4460(r2pX) devices. OMAP4470 (also r2pX) is not affected by this bug because ROM code has been fixed. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-10-18 17:20:05 +08:00
static void __iomem *gic_dist_base_addr;
static void __iomem *twd_base;
#define IRQ_LOCALTIMER 29
#ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_INTERCONNECT_BARRIER
/* Used to implement memory barrier on DRAM path */
#define OMAP4_DRAM_BARRIER_VA 0xfe600000
static void __iomem *dram_sync, *sram_sync;
static phys_addr_t dram_sync_paddr;
static u32 dram_sync_size;
/*
* The OMAP4 bus structure contains asynchronous bridges which can buffer
* data writes from the MPU. These asynchronous bridges can be found on
* paths between the MPU to EMIF, and the MPU to L3 interconnects.
*
* We need to be careful about re-ordering which can happen as a result
* of different accesses being performed via different paths, and
* therefore different asynchronous bridges.
*/
/*
* OMAP4 interconnect barrier which is called for each mb() and wmb().
* This is to ensure that normal paths to DRAM (normal memory, cacheable
* accesses) are properly synchronised with writes to DMA coherent memory
* (normal memory, uncacheable) and device writes.
*
* The mb() and wmb() barriers only operate only on the MPU->MA->EMIF
* path, as we need to ensure that data is visible to other system
* masters prior to writes to those system masters being seen.
*
* Note: the SRAM path is not synchronised via mb() and wmb().
*/
static void omap4_mb(void)
{
if (dram_sync)
writel_relaxed(0, dram_sync);
}
/*
* OMAP4 Errata i688 - asynchronous bridge corruption when entering WFI.
*
* If a data is stalled inside asynchronous bridge because of back
* pressure, it may be accepted multiple times, creating pointer
* misalignment that will corrupt next transfers on that data path until
* next reset of the system. No recovery procedure once the issue is hit,
* the path remains consistently broken.
*
* Async bridges can be found on paths between MPU to EMIF and MPU to L3
* interconnects.
*
* This situation can happen only when the idle is initiated by a Master
* Request Disconnection (which is trigged by software when executing WFI
* on the CPU).
*
* The work-around for this errata needs all the initiators connected
* through an async bridge to ensure that data path is properly drained
* before issuing WFI. This condition will be met if one Strongly ordered
* access is performed to the target right before executing the WFI.
*
* In MPU case, L3 T2ASYNC FIFO and DDR T2ASYNC FIFO needs to be drained.
* IO barrier ensure that there is no synchronisation loss on initiators
* operating on both interconnect port simultaneously.
*
* This is a stronger version of the OMAP4 memory barrier below, and
* operates on both the MPU->MA->EMIF path but also the MPU->OCP path
* as well, and is necessary prior to executing a WFI.
*/
void omap_interconnect_sync(void)
{
if (dram_sync && sram_sync) {
writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(dram_sync), dram_sync);
writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(sram_sync), sram_sync);
isb();
}
}
static int __init omap4_sram_init(void)
{
struct device_node *np;
struct gen_pool *sram_pool;
np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,omap4-mpu");
if (!np)
pr_warn("%s:Unable to allocate sram needed to handle errata I688\n",
__func__);
sram_pool = of_gen_pool_get(np, "sram", 0);
if (!sram_pool)
pr_warn("%s:Unable to get sram pool needed to handle errata I688\n",
__func__);
else
sram_sync = (void *)gen_pool_alloc(sram_pool, PAGE_SIZE);
return 0;
}
omap_arch_initcall(omap4_sram_init);
/* Steal one page physical memory for barrier implementation */
void __init omap_barrier_reserve_memblock(void)
{
dram_sync_size = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE, SZ_1M);
dram_sync_paddr = arm_memblock_steal(dram_sync_size, SZ_1M);
}
void __init omap_barriers_init(void)
{
struct map_desc dram_io_desc[1];
dram_io_desc[0].virtual = OMAP4_DRAM_BARRIER_VA;
dram_io_desc[0].pfn = __phys_to_pfn(dram_sync_paddr);
dram_io_desc[0].length = dram_sync_size;
dram_io_desc[0].type = MT_MEMORY_RW_SO;
iotable_init(dram_io_desc, ARRAY_SIZE(dram_io_desc));
dram_sync = (void __iomem *) dram_io_desc[0].virtual;
pr_info("OMAP4: Map %pa to %p for dram barrier\n",
&dram_sync_paddr, dram_sync);
soc_mb = omap4_mb;
}
#endif
ARM: OMAP4460: Workaround for ROM bug because of CA9 r2pX GIC control register change. On OMAP4+ devices, GIC register context is lost when MPUSS hits the OSWR(Open Switch Retention). On the CPU wakeup path, ROM code gets executed and one of the steps in it is to restore the saved context of the GIC. The ROM Code GIC distributor restoration is split in two parts: CPU specific register done by each CPU and common register done by only one CPU. Below is the abstract flow. ............................................................... - MPUSS in OSWR state. - CPU0 wakes up on the event(interrupt) and start executing ROM code. [..] - CPU0 executes "GIC Restoration:" [...] - CPU0 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code. [...] - CPU0 is online in OS - CPU0 enables the GIC distributor. GICD.Enable Non-secure = 1 - CPU0 wakes up CPU1 with clock-domain force wakeup method. - CPU0 continues it's execution. [..] - CPU1 wakes up and start executing ROM code. [..] - CPU1 executes "GIC Restoration:" [..] - CPU1 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code. [...] - CPU1 is online in OS and start executing. [...] - GIC Restoration: /* Common routine for HS and GP devices */ { if (GICD != 1) { /* This will be true in OSWR state */ if (GIC_SAR_BACKUP_STATE == SAVED) - CPU restores GIC distributor else - reconfigure GIC distributor to boot values. GICD.Enable secure = 1 } if (GIC_SAR_BACKUP_STATE == SAVED) - CPU restore its GIC CPU interface registers if saved. else - reconfigure its GIC CPU interface registers to boot values. } ............................................................... So as mentioned in the flow, GICD != 1 condition decides how the GIC registers are handled in ROM code wakeup path from OSWR. As evident from the flow, ROM code relies on the entire GICD register value and not specific register bits. The assumption was valid till CortexA9 r1pX version since there was only one banked bit to control secure and non-secure GICD. Secure view which ROM code sees: bit 0 == Enable Non-secure Non-secure view which HLOS sees: bit 0 == Enable secure But GICD register has changed between CortexA9 r1pX and r2pX. On r2pX GICD register is composed of 2 bits. Secure view which ROM code sees: bit 1 == Enable Non-secure bit 0 == Enable secure Non-secure view which HLOS sees: bit 0 == Enable Non-secure Hence on OMAP4460(r2pX) devices, if you go through the above flow again during CPU1 wakeup, GICD == 3 and hence ROM code fails to understand the real wakeup power state and reconfigures GIC distributor to boot values. This is nasty since you loose the entire interrupt controller context in a live system. The ROM code fix done on next OMAP4 device (OMAP4470 - r2px) is to check "GICD.Enable secure != 1" for GIC restoration in OSWR wakeup path. Since ROM code can't be fixed on OMAP4460 devices, a work around needs to be implemented. As evident from the flow, as long as CPU1 sees GICD == 1 in it's wakeup path from OSWR, the issue won't happen. Below is the flow with the work-around. ............................................................... - MPUSS in OSWR state. - CPU0 wakes up on the event(interrupt) and start executing ROM code. [..] - CPU0 executes "GIC Restoration:" [..] - CPU0 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code. [..] - CPU0 is online in OS. - CPU0 does GICD.Enable Non-secure = 0 - CPU0 wakes up CPU1 with clock domain force wakeup method. - CPU0 waits for GICD.Enable Non-secure = 1 - CPU0 coninues it's execution. [..] - CPU1 wakes up and start executing ROM code. [..] - CPU1 executes "GIC Restoration:" [..] - CPU1 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code. [..] - CPU1 is online in OS - CPU1 does GICD.Enable Non-secure = 1 - CPU1 start executing [...] ............................................................... With this procedure, the GIC configuration done between the CPU0 wakeup and CPU1 wakeup will not be lost but during this short windows, the CPU0 will not receive interrupts. The BUG is applicable to only OMAP4460(r2pX) devices. OMAP4470 (also r2pX) is not affected by this bug because ROM code has been fixed. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-10-18 17:20:05 +08:00
void gic_dist_disable(void)
{
if (gic_dist_base_addr)
writel_relaxed(0x0, gic_dist_base_addr + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
ARM: OMAP4460: Workaround for ROM bug because of CA9 r2pX GIC control register change. On OMAP4+ devices, GIC register context is lost when MPUSS hits the OSWR(Open Switch Retention). On the CPU wakeup path, ROM code gets executed and one of the steps in it is to restore the saved context of the GIC. The ROM Code GIC distributor restoration is split in two parts: CPU specific register done by each CPU and common register done by only one CPU. Below is the abstract flow. ............................................................... - MPUSS in OSWR state. - CPU0 wakes up on the event(interrupt) and start executing ROM code. [..] - CPU0 executes "GIC Restoration:" [...] - CPU0 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code. [...] - CPU0 is online in OS - CPU0 enables the GIC distributor. GICD.Enable Non-secure = 1 - CPU0 wakes up CPU1 with clock-domain force wakeup method. - CPU0 continues it's execution. [..] - CPU1 wakes up and start executing ROM code. [..] - CPU1 executes "GIC Restoration:" [..] - CPU1 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code. [...] - CPU1 is online in OS and start executing. [...] - GIC Restoration: /* Common routine for HS and GP devices */ { if (GICD != 1) { /* This will be true in OSWR state */ if (GIC_SAR_BACKUP_STATE == SAVED) - CPU restores GIC distributor else - reconfigure GIC distributor to boot values. GICD.Enable secure = 1 } if (GIC_SAR_BACKUP_STATE == SAVED) - CPU restore its GIC CPU interface registers if saved. else - reconfigure its GIC CPU interface registers to boot values. } ............................................................... So as mentioned in the flow, GICD != 1 condition decides how the GIC registers are handled in ROM code wakeup path from OSWR. As evident from the flow, ROM code relies on the entire GICD register value and not specific register bits. The assumption was valid till CortexA9 r1pX version since there was only one banked bit to control secure and non-secure GICD. Secure view which ROM code sees: bit 0 == Enable Non-secure Non-secure view which HLOS sees: bit 0 == Enable secure But GICD register has changed between CortexA9 r1pX and r2pX. On r2pX GICD register is composed of 2 bits. Secure view which ROM code sees: bit 1 == Enable Non-secure bit 0 == Enable secure Non-secure view which HLOS sees: bit 0 == Enable Non-secure Hence on OMAP4460(r2pX) devices, if you go through the above flow again during CPU1 wakeup, GICD == 3 and hence ROM code fails to understand the real wakeup power state and reconfigures GIC distributor to boot values. This is nasty since you loose the entire interrupt controller context in a live system. The ROM code fix done on next OMAP4 device (OMAP4470 - r2px) is to check "GICD.Enable secure != 1" for GIC restoration in OSWR wakeup path. Since ROM code can't be fixed on OMAP4460 devices, a work around needs to be implemented. As evident from the flow, as long as CPU1 sees GICD == 1 in it's wakeup path from OSWR, the issue won't happen. Below is the flow with the work-around. ............................................................... - MPUSS in OSWR state. - CPU0 wakes up on the event(interrupt) and start executing ROM code. [..] - CPU0 executes "GIC Restoration:" [..] - CPU0 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code. [..] - CPU0 is online in OS. - CPU0 does GICD.Enable Non-secure = 0 - CPU0 wakes up CPU1 with clock domain force wakeup method. - CPU0 waits for GICD.Enable Non-secure = 1 - CPU0 coninues it's execution. [..] - CPU1 wakes up and start executing ROM code. [..] - CPU1 executes "GIC Restoration:" [..] - CPU1 swicthes to non-secure mode and jumps to OS resume code. [..] - CPU1 is online in OS - CPU1 does GICD.Enable Non-secure = 1 - CPU1 start executing [...] ............................................................... With this procedure, the GIC configuration done between the CPU0 wakeup and CPU1 wakeup will not be lost but during this short windows, the CPU0 will not receive interrupts. The BUG is applicable to only OMAP4460(r2pX) devices. OMAP4470 (also r2pX) is not affected by this bug because ROM code has been fixed. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2012-10-18 17:20:05 +08:00
}
void gic_dist_enable(void)
{
if (gic_dist_base_addr)
writel_relaxed(0x1, gic_dist_base_addr + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
}
bool gic_dist_disabled(void)
{
return !(readl_relaxed(gic_dist_base_addr + GIC_DIST_CTRL) & 0x1);
}
void gic_timer_retrigger(void)
{
u32 twd_int = readl_relaxed(twd_base + TWD_TIMER_INTSTAT);
u32 gic_int = readl_relaxed(gic_dist_base_addr + GIC_DIST_PENDING_SET);
u32 twd_ctrl = readl_relaxed(twd_base + TWD_TIMER_CONTROL);
if (twd_int && !(gic_int & BIT(IRQ_LOCALTIMER))) {
/*
* The local timer interrupt got lost while the distributor was
* disabled. Ack the pending interrupt, and retrigger it.
*/
pr_warn("%s: lost localtimer interrupt\n", __func__);
writel_relaxed(1, twd_base + TWD_TIMER_INTSTAT);
if (!(twd_ctrl & TWD_TIMER_CONTROL_PERIODIC)) {
writel_relaxed(1, twd_base + TWD_TIMER_COUNTER);
twd_ctrl |= TWD_TIMER_CONTROL_ENABLE;
writel_relaxed(twd_ctrl, twd_base + TWD_TIMER_CONTROL);
}
}
}
#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0
void __iomem *omap4_get_l2cache_base(void)
{
return l2cache_base;
}
void omap4_l2c310_write_sec(unsigned long val, unsigned reg)
{
unsigned smc_op;
switch (reg) {
case L2X0_CTRL:
smc_op = OMAP4_MON_L2X0_CTRL_INDEX;
break;
case L2X0_AUX_CTRL:
smc_op = OMAP4_MON_L2X0_AUXCTRL_INDEX;
break;
case L2X0_DEBUG_CTRL:
smc_op = OMAP4_MON_L2X0_DBG_CTRL_INDEX;
break;
case L310_PREFETCH_CTRL:
smc_op = OMAP4_MON_L2X0_PREFETCH_INDEX;
break;
case L310_POWER_CTRL:
pr_info_once("OMAP L2C310: ROM does not support power control setting\n");
return;
default:
WARN_ONCE(1, "OMAP L2C310: ignoring write to reg 0x%x\n", reg);
return;
}
omap_smc1(smc_op, val);
}
int __init omap_l2_cache_init(void)
{
/* Static mapping, never released */
l2cache_base = ioremap(OMAP44XX_L2CACHE_BASE, SZ_4K);
if (WARN_ON(!l2cache_base))
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
#endif
void __iomem *omap4_get_sar_ram_base(void)
{
return sar_ram_base;
}
/*
* SAR RAM used to save and restore the HW context in low power modes.
* Note that we need to initialize this very early for kexec. See
* omap4_mpuss_early_init().
*/
void __init omap4_sar_ram_init(void)
{
unsigned long sar_base;
/*
* To avoid code running on other OMAPs in
* multi-omap builds
*/
if (cpu_is_omap44xx())
sar_base = OMAP44XX_SAR_RAM_BASE;
else if (soc_is_omap54xx())
sar_base = OMAP54XX_SAR_RAM_BASE;
else
return;
/* Static mapping, never released */
sar_ram_base = ioremap(sar_base, SZ_16K);
if (WARN_ON(!sar_ram_base))
return;
}
ARM: omap: convert wakeupgen to stacked domains OMAP4/5 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert this code to use stacked domains instead. This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually reflect what the HW provides. BIG FAT WARNING: because the DTs were so far lying by not exposing the WUGEN HW block, kernels with this patch applied won't have any suspend-resume facility when booted with old DTs, and old kernels with updated DTs won't even boot. On a platform with this patch applied, the system looks like this: root@bacon-fat:~# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 16: 0 0 WUGEN 37 gp_timer 19: 233799 155916 GIC 27 arch_timer 23: 0 0 WUGEN 9 l3-dbg-irq 24: 1 0 WUGEN 10 l3-app-irq 27: 282 0 WUGEN 13 omap-dma-engine 44: 0 0 4ae10000.gpio 13 DMA 294: 0 0 WUGEN 20 gpmc 297: 506 0 WUGEN 56 48070000.i2c 298: 0 0 WUGEN 57 48072000.i2c 299: 0 0 WUGEN 61 48060000.i2c 300: 0 0 WUGEN 62 4807a000.i2c 301: 8 0 WUGEN 60 4807c000.i2c 308: 2439 0 WUGEN 74 OMAP UART2 312: 362 0 WUGEN 83 mmc2 313: 502 0 WUGEN 86 mmc0 314: 13 0 WUGEN 94 mmc1 350: 0 0 PRCM pinctrl, pinctrl 406: 35155709 0 GIC 109 ehci_hcd:usb1 407: 0 0 WUGEN 7 palmas 409: 0 0 WUGEN 119 twl6040 410: 0 0 twl6040 5 twl6040_irq_ready 411: 0 0 twl6040 0 twl6040_irq_th IPI0: 0 1 CPU wakeup interrupts IPI1: 0 0 Timer broadcast interrupts IPI2: 95334 902334 Rescheduling interrupts IPI3: 0 0 Function call interrupts IPI4: 479 648 Single function call interrupts IPI5: 0 0 CPU stop interrupts IPI6: 0 0 IRQ work interrupts IPI7: 0 0 completion interrupts Err: 0 Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1426088629-15377-8-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
2015-03-11 23:43:49 +08:00
static const struct of_device_id intc_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "ti,omap4-wugen-mpu", },
{ .compatible = "ti,omap5-wugen-mpu", },
{ },
};
ARM: omap: convert wakeupgen to stacked domains OMAP4/5 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert this code to use stacked domains instead. This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually reflect what the HW provides. BIG FAT WARNING: because the DTs were so far lying by not exposing the WUGEN HW block, kernels with this patch applied won't have any suspend-resume facility when booted with old DTs, and old kernels with updated DTs won't even boot. On a platform with this patch applied, the system looks like this: root@bacon-fat:~# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 16: 0 0 WUGEN 37 gp_timer 19: 233799 155916 GIC 27 arch_timer 23: 0 0 WUGEN 9 l3-dbg-irq 24: 1 0 WUGEN 10 l3-app-irq 27: 282 0 WUGEN 13 omap-dma-engine 44: 0 0 4ae10000.gpio 13 DMA 294: 0 0 WUGEN 20 gpmc 297: 506 0 WUGEN 56 48070000.i2c 298: 0 0 WUGEN 57 48072000.i2c 299: 0 0 WUGEN 61 48060000.i2c 300: 0 0 WUGEN 62 4807a000.i2c 301: 8 0 WUGEN 60 4807c000.i2c 308: 2439 0 WUGEN 74 OMAP UART2 312: 362 0 WUGEN 83 mmc2 313: 502 0 WUGEN 86 mmc0 314: 13 0 WUGEN 94 mmc1 350: 0 0 PRCM pinctrl, pinctrl 406: 35155709 0 GIC 109 ehci_hcd:usb1 407: 0 0 WUGEN 7 palmas 409: 0 0 WUGEN 119 twl6040 410: 0 0 twl6040 5 twl6040_irq_ready 411: 0 0 twl6040 0 twl6040_irq_th IPI0: 0 1 CPU wakeup interrupts IPI1: 0 0 Timer broadcast interrupts IPI2: 95334 902334 Rescheduling interrupts IPI3: 0 0 Function call interrupts IPI4: 479 648 Single function call interrupts IPI5: 0 0 CPU stop interrupts IPI6: 0 0 IRQ work interrupts IPI7: 0 0 completion interrupts Err: 0 Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1426088629-15377-8-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
2015-03-11 23:43:49 +08:00
static struct device_node *intc_node;
void __init omap_gic_of_init(void)
{
struct device_node *np;
ARM: omap: convert wakeupgen to stacked domains OMAP4/5 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert this code to use stacked domains instead. This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually reflect what the HW provides. BIG FAT WARNING: because the DTs were so far lying by not exposing the WUGEN HW block, kernels with this patch applied won't have any suspend-resume facility when booted with old DTs, and old kernels with updated DTs won't even boot. On a platform with this patch applied, the system looks like this: root@bacon-fat:~# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 16: 0 0 WUGEN 37 gp_timer 19: 233799 155916 GIC 27 arch_timer 23: 0 0 WUGEN 9 l3-dbg-irq 24: 1 0 WUGEN 10 l3-app-irq 27: 282 0 WUGEN 13 omap-dma-engine 44: 0 0 4ae10000.gpio 13 DMA 294: 0 0 WUGEN 20 gpmc 297: 506 0 WUGEN 56 48070000.i2c 298: 0 0 WUGEN 57 48072000.i2c 299: 0 0 WUGEN 61 48060000.i2c 300: 0 0 WUGEN 62 4807a000.i2c 301: 8 0 WUGEN 60 4807c000.i2c 308: 2439 0 WUGEN 74 OMAP UART2 312: 362 0 WUGEN 83 mmc2 313: 502 0 WUGEN 86 mmc0 314: 13 0 WUGEN 94 mmc1 350: 0 0 PRCM pinctrl, pinctrl 406: 35155709 0 GIC 109 ehci_hcd:usb1 407: 0 0 WUGEN 7 palmas 409: 0 0 WUGEN 119 twl6040 410: 0 0 twl6040 5 twl6040_irq_ready 411: 0 0 twl6040 0 twl6040_irq_th IPI0: 0 1 CPU wakeup interrupts IPI1: 0 0 Timer broadcast interrupts IPI2: 95334 902334 Rescheduling interrupts IPI3: 0 0 Function call interrupts IPI4: 479 648 Single function call interrupts IPI5: 0 0 CPU stop interrupts IPI6: 0 0 IRQ work interrupts IPI7: 0 0 completion interrupts Err: 0 Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1426088629-15377-8-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
2015-03-11 23:43:49 +08:00
intc_node = of_find_matching_node(NULL, intc_match);
if (WARN_ON(!intc_node)) {
pr_err("No WUGEN found in DT, system will misbehave.\n");
pr_err("UPDATE YOUR DEVICE TREE!\n");
}
/* Extract GIC distributor and TWD bases for OMAP4460 ROM Errata WA */
if (!cpu_is_omap446x())
goto skip_errata_init;
np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cortex-a9-gic");
gic_dist_base_addr = of_iomap(np, 0);
WARN_ON(!gic_dist_base_addr);
np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cortex-a9-twd-timer");
twd_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
WARN_ON(!twd_base);
skip_errata_init:
irqchip_init();
}