linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h

139 lines
3.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
/*
* Copyright (C) 2017 ARM Ltd.
*/
#ifndef __ASM_DAIFFLAGS_H
#define __ASM_DAIFFLAGS_H
#include <linux/irqflags.h>
arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking When using IRQ priority masking to disable interrupts, in order to deal with the PSR.I state, local_irq_save() would convert the I bit into a PMR value (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF). This resulted in local_irq_restore() potentially modifying the value of PMR in undesired location due to the state of PSR.I upon flag saving [1]. In an attempt to solve this issue in a less hackish manner, introduce a bit (GIC_PRIO_IGNORE_PMR) for the PMR values that can represent whether PSR.I is being used to disable interrupts, in which case it takes precedence of the status of interrupt masking via PMR. GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is chosen such that (<pmr_value> | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET) does not mask more interrupts than <pmr_value> as some sections (e.g. arch_cpu_idle(), interrupt acknowledge path) requires PMR not to mask interrupts that could be signaled to the CPU when using only PSR.I. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg716956.html Fixes: 4a503217ce37 ("arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.1.x- Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2019-06-11 17:38:10 +08:00
#include <asm/arch_gicv3.h>
#include <asm/barrier.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#define DAIF_PROCCTX 0
#define DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ PSR_I_BIT
#define DAIF_ERRCTX (PSR_I_BIT | PSR_A_BIT)
arm64: kprobes: Recover pstate.D in single-step exception handler kprobes manipulates the interrupted PSTATE for single step, and doesn't restore it. Thus, if we put a kprobe where the pstate.D (debug) masked, the mask will be cleared after the kprobe hits. Moreover, in the most complicated case, this can lead a kernel crash with below message when a nested kprobe hits. [ 152.118921] Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1 When the 1st kprobe hits, do_debug_exception() will be called. At this point, debug exception (= pstate.D) must be masked (=1). But if another kprobes hits before single-step of the first kprobe (e.g. inside user pre_handler), it unmask the debug exception (pstate.D = 0) and return. Then, when the 1st kprobe setting up single-step, it saves current DAIF, mask DAIF, enable single-step, and restore DAIF. However, since "D" flag in DAIF is cleared by the 2nd kprobe, the single-step exception happens soon after restoring DAIF. This has been introduced by commit 7419333fa15e ("arm64: kprobe: Always clear pstate.D in breakpoint exception handler") To solve this issue, this stores all DAIF bits and restore it after single stepping. Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Fixes: 7419333fa15e ("arm64: kprobe: Always clear pstate.D in breakpoint exception handler") Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-01 22:25:49 +08:00
#define DAIF_MASK (PSR_D_BIT | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT)
/* mask/save/unmask/restore all exceptions, including interrupts. */
static inline void local_daif_mask(void)
{
WARN_ON(system_has_prio_mask_debugging() &&
(read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) == (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF |
GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET)));
asm volatile(
"msr daifset, #0xf // local_daif_mask\n"
:
:
: "memory");
arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking When using IRQ priority masking to disable interrupts, in order to deal with the PSR.I state, local_irq_save() would convert the I bit into a PMR value (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF). This resulted in local_irq_restore() potentially modifying the value of PMR in undesired location due to the state of PSR.I upon flag saving [1]. In an attempt to solve this issue in a less hackish manner, introduce a bit (GIC_PRIO_IGNORE_PMR) for the PMR values that can represent whether PSR.I is being used to disable interrupts, in which case it takes precedence of the status of interrupt masking via PMR. GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is chosen such that (<pmr_value> | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET) does not mask more interrupts than <pmr_value> as some sections (e.g. arch_cpu_idle(), interrupt acknowledge path) requires PMR not to mask interrupts that could be signaled to the CPU when using only PSR.I. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg716956.html Fixes: 4a503217ce37 ("arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.1.x- Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2019-06-11 17:38:10 +08:00
/* Don't really care for a dsb here, we don't intend to enable IRQs */
if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET);
trace_hardirqs_off();
}
static inline unsigned long local_daif_save_flags(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
flags = read_sysreg(daif);
if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
/* If IRQs are masked with PMR, reflect it in the flags */
arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking When using IRQ priority masking to disable interrupts, in order to deal with the PSR.I state, local_irq_save() would convert the I bit into a PMR value (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF). This resulted in local_irq_restore() potentially modifying the value of PMR in undesired location due to the state of PSR.I upon flag saving [1]. In an attempt to solve this issue in a less hackish manner, introduce a bit (GIC_PRIO_IGNORE_PMR) for the PMR values that can represent whether PSR.I is being used to disable interrupts, in which case it takes precedence of the status of interrupt masking via PMR. GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is chosen such that (<pmr_value> | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET) does not mask more interrupts than <pmr_value> as some sections (e.g. arch_cpu_idle(), interrupt acknowledge path) requires PMR not to mask interrupts that could be signaled to the CPU when using only PSR.I. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg716956.html Fixes: 4a503217ce37 ("arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.1.x- Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2019-06-11 17:38:10 +08:00
if (read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) != GIC_PRIO_IRQON)
flags |= PSR_I_BIT;
}
return flags;
}
static inline unsigned long local_daif_save(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
flags = local_daif_save_flags();
local_daif_mask();
return flags;
}
static inline void local_daif_restore(unsigned long flags)
{
bool irq_disabled = flags & PSR_I_BIT;
WARN_ON(system_has_prio_mask_debugging() &&
!(read_sysreg(daif) & PSR_I_BIT));
if (!irq_disabled) {
trace_hardirqs_on();
if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking When using IRQ priority masking to disable interrupts, in order to deal with the PSR.I state, local_irq_save() would convert the I bit into a PMR value (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF). This resulted in local_irq_restore() potentially modifying the value of PMR in undesired location due to the state of PSR.I upon flag saving [1]. In an attempt to solve this issue in a less hackish manner, introduce a bit (GIC_PRIO_IGNORE_PMR) for the PMR values that can represent whether PSR.I is being used to disable interrupts, in which case it takes precedence of the status of interrupt masking via PMR. GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is chosen such that (<pmr_value> | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET) does not mask more interrupts than <pmr_value> as some sections (e.g. arch_cpu_idle(), interrupt acknowledge path) requires PMR not to mask interrupts that could be signaled to the CPU when using only PSR.I. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg716956.html Fixes: 4a503217ce37 ("arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.1.x- Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2019-06-11 17:38:10 +08:00
gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON);
pmr_sync();
arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking When using IRQ priority masking to disable interrupts, in order to deal with the PSR.I state, local_irq_save() would convert the I bit into a PMR value (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF). This resulted in local_irq_restore() potentially modifying the value of PMR in undesired location due to the state of PSR.I upon flag saving [1]. In an attempt to solve this issue in a less hackish manner, introduce a bit (GIC_PRIO_IGNORE_PMR) for the PMR values that can represent whether PSR.I is being used to disable interrupts, in which case it takes precedence of the status of interrupt masking via PMR. GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is chosen such that (<pmr_value> | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET) does not mask more interrupts than <pmr_value> as some sections (e.g. arch_cpu_idle(), interrupt acknowledge path) requires PMR not to mask interrupts that could be signaled to the CPU when using only PSR.I. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg716956.html Fixes: 4a503217ce37 ("arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.1.x- Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2019-06-11 17:38:10 +08:00
}
} else if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
u64 pmr;
if (!(flags & PSR_A_BIT)) {
/*
arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking When using IRQ priority masking to disable interrupts, in order to deal with the PSR.I state, local_irq_save() would convert the I bit into a PMR value (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF). This resulted in local_irq_restore() potentially modifying the value of PMR in undesired location due to the state of PSR.I upon flag saving [1]. In an attempt to solve this issue in a less hackish manner, introduce a bit (GIC_PRIO_IGNORE_PMR) for the PMR values that can represent whether PSR.I is being used to disable interrupts, in which case it takes precedence of the status of interrupt masking via PMR. GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is chosen such that (<pmr_value> | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET) does not mask more interrupts than <pmr_value> as some sections (e.g. arch_cpu_idle(), interrupt acknowledge path) requires PMR not to mask interrupts that could be signaled to the CPU when using only PSR.I. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg716956.html Fixes: 4a503217ce37 ("arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.1.x- Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2019-06-11 17:38:10 +08:00
* If interrupts are disabled but we can take
* asynchronous errors, we can take NMIs
*/
arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking When using IRQ priority masking to disable interrupts, in order to deal with the PSR.I state, local_irq_save() would convert the I bit into a PMR value (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF). This resulted in local_irq_restore() potentially modifying the value of PMR in undesired location due to the state of PSR.I upon flag saving [1]. In an attempt to solve this issue in a less hackish manner, introduce a bit (GIC_PRIO_IGNORE_PMR) for the PMR values that can represent whether PSR.I is being used to disable interrupts, in which case it takes precedence of the status of interrupt masking via PMR. GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is chosen such that (<pmr_value> | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET) does not mask more interrupts than <pmr_value> as some sections (e.g. arch_cpu_idle(), interrupt acknowledge path) requires PMR not to mask interrupts that could be signaled to the CPU when using only PSR.I. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg716956.html Fixes: 4a503217ce37 ("arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.1.x- Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2019-06-11 17:38:10 +08:00
flags &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
pmr = GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF;
} else {
pmr = GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET;
}
arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking When using IRQ priority masking to disable interrupts, in order to deal with the PSR.I state, local_irq_save() would convert the I bit into a PMR value (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF). This resulted in local_irq_restore() potentially modifying the value of PMR in undesired location due to the state of PSR.I upon flag saving [1]. In an attempt to solve this issue in a less hackish manner, introduce a bit (GIC_PRIO_IGNORE_PMR) for the PMR values that can represent whether PSR.I is being used to disable interrupts, in which case it takes precedence of the status of interrupt masking via PMR. GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is chosen such that (<pmr_value> | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET) does not mask more interrupts than <pmr_value> as some sections (e.g. arch_cpu_idle(), interrupt acknowledge path) requires PMR not to mask interrupts that could be signaled to the CPU when using only PSR.I. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg716956.html Fixes: 4a503217ce37 ("arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.1.x- Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2019-06-11 17:38:10 +08:00
/*
* There has been concern that the write to daif
* might be reordered before this write to PMR.
* From the ARM ARM DDI 0487D.a, section D1.7.1
* "Accessing PSTATE fields":
* Writes to the PSTATE fields have side-effects on
* various aspects of the PE operation. All of these
* side-effects are guaranteed:
* - Not to be visible to earlier instructions in
* the execution stream.
* - To be visible to later instructions in the
* execution stream
*
* Also, writes to PMR are self-synchronizing, so no
* interrupts with a lower priority than PMR is signaled
* to the PE after the write.
*
* So we don't need additional synchronization here.
*/
gic_write_pmr(pmr);
}
write_sysreg(flags, daif);
if (irq_disabled)
trace_hardirqs_off();
}
/*
* Called by synchronous exception handlers to restore the DAIF bits that were
* modified by taking an exception.
*/
static inline void local_daif_inherit(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long flags = regs->pstate & DAIF_MASK;
/*
* We can't use local_daif_restore(regs->pstate) here as
* system_has_prio_mask_debugging() won't restore the I bit if it can
* use the pmr instead.
*/
write_sysreg(flags, daif);
}
#endif