2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Various workarounds for chipset bugs.
|
|
|
|
This code runs very early and can't use the regular PCI subsystem
|
|
|
|
The entries are keyed to PCI bridges which usually identify chipsets
|
|
|
|
uniquely.
|
|
|
|
This is only for whole classes of chipsets with specific problems which
|
|
|
|
need early invasive action (e.g. before the timers are initialized).
|
|
|
|
Most PCI device specific workarounds can be done later and should be
|
|
|
|
in standard PCI quirks
|
|
|
|
Mainboard specific bugs should be handled by DMI entries.
|
|
|
|
CPU specific bugs in setup.c */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/pci.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/acpi.h>
|
x86/quirks: Add early quirk to reset Apple AirPort card
The EFI firmware on Macs contains a full-fledged network stack for
downloading OS X images from osrecovery.apple.com. Unfortunately
on Macs introduced 2011 and 2012, EFI brings up the Broadcom 4331
wireless card on every boot and leaves it enabled even after
ExitBootServices has been called. The card continues to assert its IRQ
line, causing spurious interrupts if the IRQ is shared. It also corrupts
memory by DMAing received packets, allowing for remote code execution
over the air. This only stops when a driver is loaded for the wireless
card, which may be never if the driver is not installed or blacklisted.
The issue seems to be constrained to the Broadcom 4331. Chris Milsted
has verified that the newer Broadcom 4360 built into the MacBookPro11,3
(2013/2014) does not exhibit this behaviour. The chances that Apple will
ever supply a firmware fix for the older machines appear to be zero.
The solution is to reset the card on boot by writing to a reset bit in
its mmio space. This must be done as an early quirk and not as a plain
vanilla PCI quirk to successfully combat memory corruption by DMAed
packets: Matthew Garrett found out in 2012 that the packets are written
to EfiBootServicesData memory (http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/11235.html).
This type of memory is made available to the page allocator by
efi_free_boot_services(). Plain vanilla PCI quirks run much later, in
subsys initcall level. In-between a time window would be open for memory
corruption. Random crashes occurring in this time window and attributed
to DMAed packets have indeed been observed in the wild by Chris
Bainbridge.
When Matthew Garrett analyzed the memory corruption issue in 2012, he
sought to fix it with a grub quirk which transitions the card to D3hot:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=9d34bb85da56
This approach does not help users with other bootloaders and while it
may prevent DMAed packets, it does not cure the spurious interrupts
emanating from the card. Unfortunately the card's mmio space is
inaccessible in D3hot, so to reset it, we have to undo the effect of
Matthew's grub patch and transition the card back to D0.
Note that the quirk takes a few shortcuts to reduce the amount of code:
The size of BAR 0 and the location of the PM capability is identical
on all affected machines and therefore hardcoded. Only the address of
BAR 0 differs between models. Also, it is assumed that the BCMA core
currently mapped is the 802.11 core. The EFI driver seems to always take
care of this.
Michael Büsch, Bjorn Helgaas and Matt Fleming contributed feedback
towards finding the best solution to this problem.
The following should be a comprehensive list of affected models:
iMac13,1 2012 21.5" [Root Port 00:1c.3 = 8086:1e16]
iMac13,2 2012 27" [Root Port 00:1c.3 = 8086:1e16]
Macmini5,1 2011 i5 2.3 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini5,2 2011 i5 2.5 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini5,3 2011 i7 2.0 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini6,1 2012 i5 2.5 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
Macmini6,2 2012 i7 2.3 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro8,1 2011 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro8,2 2011 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro8,3 2011 17" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro9,1 2012 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro9,2 2012 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro10,1 2012 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro10,2 2012 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
For posterity, spurious interrupts caused by the Broadcom 4331 wireless
card resulted in splats like this (stacktrace omitted):
irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
handlers:
[<ffffffff81374370>] pcie_isr
[<ffffffffc0704550>] sdhci_irq [sdhci] threaded [<ffffffffc07013c0>] sdhci_thread_irq [sdhci]
[<ffffffffc0a0b960>] azx_interrupt [snd_hda_codec]
Disabling IRQ #17
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79301
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111781
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728916
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895951#c16
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009819
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098621
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149632#c5
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279130
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332732
Tested-by: Konstantin Simanov <k.simanov@stlk.ru> # [MacBookPro8,1]
Tested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> # [MacBookPro9,1]
Tested-by: Bryan Paradis <bryan.paradis@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro9,2]
Tested-by: Andrew Worsley <amworsley@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro10,1]
Tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro10,2]
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Milsted <cmilsted@redhat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 123456789abc: x86/quirks: Apply nvidia_bugs quirk only on root bus
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 123456789abc: x86/quirks: Reintroduce scanning of secondary buses
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/48d0972ac82a53d460e5fce77a07b2560db95203.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de
[ Did minor readability edits. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/delay.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/dmi.h>
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/pci_ids.h>
|
x86/quirks: Add early quirk to reset Apple AirPort card
The EFI firmware on Macs contains a full-fledged network stack for
downloading OS X images from osrecovery.apple.com. Unfortunately
on Macs introduced 2011 and 2012, EFI brings up the Broadcom 4331
wireless card on every boot and leaves it enabled even after
ExitBootServices has been called. The card continues to assert its IRQ
line, causing spurious interrupts if the IRQ is shared. It also corrupts
memory by DMAing received packets, allowing for remote code execution
over the air. This only stops when a driver is loaded for the wireless
card, which may be never if the driver is not installed or blacklisted.
The issue seems to be constrained to the Broadcom 4331. Chris Milsted
has verified that the newer Broadcom 4360 built into the MacBookPro11,3
(2013/2014) does not exhibit this behaviour. The chances that Apple will
ever supply a firmware fix for the older machines appear to be zero.
The solution is to reset the card on boot by writing to a reset bit in
its mmio space. This must be done as an early quirk and not as a plain
vanilla PCI quirk to successfully combat memory corruption by DMAed
packets: Matthew Garrett found out in 2012 that the packets are written
to EfiBootServicesData memory (http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/11235.html).
This type of memory is made available to the page allocator by
efi_free_boot_services(). Plain vanilla PCI quirks run much later, in
subsys initcall level. In-between a time window would be open for memory
corruption. Random crashes occurring in this time window and attributed
to DMAed packets have indeed been observed in the wild by Chris
Bainbridge.
When Matthew Garrett analyzed the memory corruption issue in 2012, he
sought to fix it with a grub quirk which transitions the card to D3hot:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=9d34bb85da56
This approach does not help users with other bootloaders and while it
may prevent DMAed packets, it does not cure the spurious interrupts
emanating from the card. Unfortunately the card's mmio space is
inaccessible in D3hot, so to reset it, we have to undo the effect of
Matthew's grub patch and transition the card back to D0.
Note that the quirk takes a few shortcuts to reduce the amount of code:
The size of BAR 0 and the location of the PM capability is identical
on all affected machines and therefore hardcoded. Only the address of
BAR 0 differs between models. Also, it is assumed that the BCMA core
currently mapped is the 802.11 core. The EFI driver seems to always take
care of this.
Michael Büsch, Bjorn Helgaas and Matt Fleming contributed feedback
towards finding the best solution to this problem.
The following should be a comprehensive list of affected models:
iMac13,1 2012 21.5" [Root Port 00:1c.3 = 8086:1e16]
iMac13,2 2012 27" [Root Port 00:1c.3 = 8086:1e16]
Macmini5,1 2011 i5 2.3 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini5,2 2011 i5 2.5 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini5,3 2011 i7 2.0 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini6,1 2012 i5 2.5 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
Macmini6,2 2012 i7 2.3 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro8,1 2011 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro8,2 2011 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro8,3 2011 17" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro9,1 2012 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro9,2 2012 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro10,1 2012 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro10,2 2012 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
For posterity, spurious interrupts caused by the Broadcom 4331 wireless
card resulted in splats like this (stacktrace omitted):
irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
handlers:
[<ffffffff81374370>] pcie_isr
[<ffffffffc0704550>] sdhci_irq [sdhci] threaded [<ffffffffc07013c0>] sdhci_thread_irq [sdhci]
[<ffffffffc0a0b960>] azx_interrupt [snd_hda_codec]
Disabling IRQ #17
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79301
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111781
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728916
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895951#c16
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009819
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098621
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149632#c5
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279130
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332732
Tested-by: Konstantin Simanov <k.simanov@stlk.ru> # [MacBookPro8,1]
Tested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> # [MacBookPro9,1]
Tested-by: Bryan Paradis <bryan.paradis@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro9,2]
Tested-by: Andrew Worsley <amworsley@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro10,1]
Tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro10,2]
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Milsted <cmilsted@redhat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 123456789abc: x86/quirks: Apply nvidia_bugs quirk only on root bus
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 123456789abc: x86/quirks: Reintroduce scanning of secondary buses
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/48d0972ac82a53d460e5fce77a07b2560db95203.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de
[ Did minor readability edits. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/bcma/bcma.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/bcma/bcma_regs.h>
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <drm/i915_drm.h>
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/pci-direct.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/dma.h>
|
2007-10-20 02:35:03 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/io_apic.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/apic.h>
|
2014-04-24 16:18:18 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/hpet.h>
|
2008-07-11 09:23:42 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/iommu.h>
|
2008-11-28 01:39:15 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/gart.h>
|
2013-04-17 04:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/irq_remapping.h>
|
x86/quirks: Add early quirk to reset Apple AirPort card
The EFI firmware on Macs contains a full-fledged network stack for
downloading OS X images from osrecovery.apple.com. Unfortunately
on Macs introduced 2011 and 2012, EFI brings up the Broadcom 4331
wireless card on every boot and leaves it enabled even after
ExitBootServices has been called. The card continues to assert its IRQ
line, causing spurious interrupts if the IRQ is shared. It also corrupts
memory by DMAing received packets, allowing for remote code execution
over the air. This only stops when a driver is loaded for the wireless
card, which may be never if the driver is not installed or blacklisted.
The issue seems to be constrained to the Broadcom 4331. Chris Milsted
has verified that the newer Broadcom 4360 built into the MacBookPro11,3
(2013/2014) does not exhibit this behaviour. The chances that Apple will
ever supply a firmware fix for the older machines appear to be zero.
The solution is to reset the card on boot by writing to a reset bit in
its mmio space. This must be done as an early quirk and not as a plain
vanilla PCI quirk to successfully combat memory corruption by DMAed
packets: Matthew Garrett found out in 2012 that the packets are written
to EfiBootServicesData memory (http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/11235.html).
This type of memory is made available to the page allocator by
efi_free_boot_services(). Plain vanilla PCI quirks run much later, in
subsys initcall level. In-between a time window would be open for memory
corruption. Random crashes occurring in this time window and attributed
to DMAed packets have indeed been observed in the wild by Chris
Bainbridge.
When Matthew Garrett analyzed the memory corruption issue in 2012, he
sought to fix it with a grub quirk which transitions the card to D3hot:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=9d34bb85da56
This approach does not help users with other bootloaders and while it
may prevent DMAed packets, it does not cure the spurious interrupts
emanating from the card. Unfortunately the card's mmio space is
inaccessible in D3hot, so to reset it, we have to undo the effect of
Matthew's grub patch and transition the card back to D0.
Note that the quirk takes a few shortcuts to reduce the amount of code:
The size of BAR 0 and the location of the PM capability is identical
on all affected machines and therefore hardcoded. Only the address of
BAR 0 differs between models. Also, it is assumed that the BCMA core
currently mapped is the 802.11 core. The EFI driver seems to always take
care of this.
Michael Büsch, Bjorn Helgaas and Matt Fleming contributed feedback
towards finding the best solution to this problem.
The following should be a comprehensive list of affected models:
iMac13,1 2012 21.5" [Root Port 00:1c.3 = 8086:1e16]
iMac13,2 2012 27" [Root Port 00:1c.3 = 8086:1e16]
Macmini5,1 2011 i5 2.3 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini5,2 2011 i5 2.5 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini5,3 2011 i7 2.0 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini6,1 2012 i5 2.5 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
Macmini6,2 2012 i7 2.3 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro8,1 2011 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro8,2 2011 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro8,3 2011 17" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro9,1 2012 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro9,2 2012 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro10,1 2012 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro10,2 2012 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
For posterity, spurious interrupts caused by the Broadcom 4331 wireless
card resulted in splats like this (stacktrace omitted):
irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
handlers:
[<ffffffff81374370>] pcie_isr
[<ffffffffc0704550>] sdhci_irq [sdhci] threaded [<ffffffffc07013c0>] sdhci_thread_irq [sdhci]
[<ffffffffc0a0b960>] azx_interrupt [snd_hda_codec]
Disabling IRQ #17
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79301
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111781
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728916
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895951#c16
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009819
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098621
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149632#c5
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279130
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332732
Tested-by: Konstantin Simanov <k.simanov@stlk.ru> # [MacBookPro8,1]
Tested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> # [MacBookPro9,1]
Tested-by: Bryan Paradis <bryan.paradis@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro9,2]
Tested-by: Andrew Worsley <amworsley@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro10,1]
Tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro10,2]
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Milsted <cmilsted@redhat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 123456789abc: x86/quirks: Apply nvidia_bugs quirk only on root bus
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 123456789abc: x86/quirks: Reintroduce scanning of secondary buses
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/48d0972ac82a53d460e5fce77a07b2560db95203.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de
[ Did minor readability edits. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/early_ioremap.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define dev_err(msg) pr_err("pci 0000:%02x:%02x.%d: %s", bus, slot, func, msg)
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-30 20:31:25 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __init fix_hypertransport_config(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 htcfg;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* we found a hypertransport bus
|
|
|
|
* make sure that we are broadcasting
|
|
|
|
* interrupts to all cpus on the ht bus
|
|
|
|
* if we're using extended apic ids
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
htcfg = read_pci_config(num, slot, func, 0x68);
|
|
|
|
if (htcfg & (1 << 18)) {
|
2008-01-30 20:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO "Detected use of extended apic ids "
|
|
|
|
"on hypertransport bus\n");
|
2008-01-30 20:31:25 +08:00
|
|
|
if ((htcfg & (1 << 17)) == 0) {
|
2008-01-30 20:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO "Enabling hypertransport extended "
|
|
|
|
"apic interrupt broadcast\n");
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO "Note this is a bios bug, "
|
|
|
|
"please contact your hw vendor\n");
|
2008-01-30 20:31:25 +08:00
|
|
|
htcfg |= (1 << 17);
|
|
|
|
write_pci_config(num, slot, func, 0x68, htcfg);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void __init via_bugs(int num, int slot, int func)
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2007-10-24 18:49:48 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_GART_IOMMU
|
2008-06-25 13:14:09 +08:00
|
|
|
if ((max_pfn > MAX_DMA32_PFN || force_iommu) &&
|
2007-10-24 18:49:50 +08:00
|
|
|
!gart_iommu_aperture_allowed) {
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO
|
2007-10-20 02:35:03 +08:00
|
|
|
"Looks like a VIA chipset. Disabling IOMMU."
|
|
|
|
" Override with iommu=allowed\n");
|
2007-10-24 18:49:50 +08:00
|
|
|
gart_iommu_aperture_disabled = 1;
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
|
2007-10-28 02:57:43 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-02-03 00:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
static int __init nvidia_hpet_check(struct acpi_table_header *header)
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-10-28 02:57:43 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif /* CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC */
|
|
|
|
#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-30 20:31:25 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __init nvidia_bugs(int num, int slot, int func)
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
|
2007-10-20 02:35:03 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
|
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Only applies to Nvidia root ports (bus 0) and not to
|
|
|
|
* Nvidia graphics cards with PCI ports on secondary buses.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (num)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* All timer overrides on Nvidia are
|
|
|
|
* wrong unless HPET is enabled.
|
2006-11-14 23:57:46 +08:00
|
|
|
* Unfortunately that's not true on many Asus boards.
|
|
|
|
* We don't know yet how to detect this automatically, but
|
|
|
|
* at least allow a command line override.
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-11-14 23:57:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (acpi_use_timer_override)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-03-09 07:28:32 +08:00
|
|
|
if (acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_HPET, nvidia_hpet_check)) {
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
acpi_skip_timer_override = 1;
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO "Nvidia board "
|
|
|
|
"detected. Ignoring ACPI "
|
|
|
|
"timer override.\n");
|
2006-11-14 23:57:46 +08:00
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO "If you got timer trouble "
|
|
|
|
"try acpi_use_timer_override\n");
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2007-10-20 02:35:03 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
/* RED-PEN skip them on mptables too? */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-15 03:01:15 +08:00
|
|
|
#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC)
|
|
|
|
static u32 __init ati_ixp4x0_rev(int num, int slot, int func)
|
2008-10-07 06:11:22 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 d;
|
|
|
|
u8 b;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b = read_pci_config_byte(num, slot, func, 0xac);
|
|
|
|
b &= ~(1<<5);
|
|
|
|
write_pci_config_byte(num, slot, func, 0xac, b);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d = read_pci_config(num, slot, func, 0x70);
|
|
|
|
d |= 1<<8;
|
|
|
|
write_pci_config(num, slot, func, 0x70, d);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d = read_pci_config(num, slot, func, 0x8);
|
|
|
|
d &= 0xff;
|
|
|
|
return d;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void __init ati_bugs(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 d;
|
|
|
|
u8 b;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (acpi_use_timer_override)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d = ati_ixp4x0_rev(num, slot, func);
|
|
|
|
if (d < 0x82)
|
|
|
|
acpi_skip_timer_override = 1;
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
/* check for IRQ0 interrupt swap */
|
|
|
|
outb(0x72, 0xcd6); b = inb(0xcd7);
|
|
|
|
if (!(b & 0x2))
|
|
|
|
acpi_skip_timer_override = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (acpi_skip_timer_override) {
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO "SB4X0 revision 0x%x\n", d);
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO "Ignoring ACPI timer override.\n");
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO "If you got timer trouble "
|
|
|
|
"try acpi_use_timer_override\n");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-15 03:01:15 +08:00
|
|
|
static u32 __init ati_sbx00_rev(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-02-24 22:53:46 +08:00
|
|
|
u32 d;
|
2008-10-15 03:01:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d = read_pci_config(num, slot, func, 0x8);
|
|
|
|
d &= 0xff;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return d;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void __init ati_bugs_contd(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 d, rev;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rev = ati_sbx00_rev(num, slot, func);
|
2011-02-24 22:53:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (rev >= 0x40)
|
|
|
|
acpi_fix_pin2_polarity = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-15 22:31:37 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* SB600: revisions 0x11, 0x12, 0x13, 0x14, ...
|
|
|
|
* SB700: revisions 0x39, 0x3a, ...
|
|
|
|
* SB800: revisions 0x40, 0x41, ...
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (rev >= 0x39)
|
2008-10-15 03:01:15 +08:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-24 22:53:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (acpi_use_timer_override)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-15 03:01:15 +08:00
|
|
|
/* check for IRQ0 interrupt swap */
|
|
|
|
d = read_pci_config(num, slot, func, 0x64);
|
|
|
|
if (!(d & (1<<14)))
|
|
|
|
acpi_skip_timer_override = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (acpi_skip_timer_override) {
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO "SB600 revision 0x%x\n", rev);
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO "Ignoring ACPI timer override.\n");
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO "If you got timer trouble "
|
|
|
|
"try acpi_use_timer_override\n");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
static void __init ati_bugs(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void __init ati_bugs_contd(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-17 04:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __init intel_remapping_check(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u8 revision;
|
2013-07-17 19:13:59 +08:00
|
|
|
u16 device;
|
2013-04-17 04:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-17 19:13:59 +08:00
|
|
|
device = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, PCI_DEVICE_ID);
|
2013-04-17 04:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
revision = read_pci_config_byte(num, slot, func, PCI_REVISION_ID);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2014-03-13 02:44:33 +08:00
|
|
|
* Revision <= 13 of all triggering devices id in this quirk
|
|
|
|
* have a problem draining interrupts when irq remapping is
|
|
|
|
* enabled, and should be flagged as broken. Additionally
|
|
|
|
* revision 0x22 of device id 0x3405 has this problem.
|
2013-04-17 04:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-03-13 02:44:33 +08:00
|
|
|
if (revision <= 0x13)
|
2013-04-17 04:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
set_irq_remapping_broken();
|
2014-03-13 02:44:33 +08:00
|
|
|
else if (device == 0x3405 && revision == 0x22)
|
2013-07-17 19:13:59 +08:00
|
|
|
set_irq_remapping_broken();
|
2013-04-17 04:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Systems with Intel graphics controllers set aside memory exclusively
|
|
|
|
* for gfx driver use. This memory is not marked in the E820 as reserved
|
|
|
|
* or as RAM, and so is subject to overlap from E820 manipulation later
|
|
|
|
* in the boot process. On some systems, MMIO space is allocated on top,
|
|
|
|
* despite the efforts of the "RAM buffer" approach, which simply rounds
|
|
|
|
* memory boundaries up to 64M to try to catch space that may decode
|
|
|
|
* as RAM and so is not suitable for MMIO.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-13 17:45:03 +08:00
|
|
|
#define KB(x) ((x) * 1024UL)
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
#define MB(x) (KB (KB (x)))
|
|
|
|
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
static size_t __init i830_tseg_size(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
u8 esmramc = read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 0, I830_ESMRAMC);
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!(esmramc & TSEG_ENABLE))
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (esmramc & I830_TSEG_SIZE_1M)
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
return MB(1);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return KB(512);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static size_t __init i845_tseg_size(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
u8 esmramc = read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 0, I845_ESMRAMC);
|
|
|
|
u8 tseg_size = esmramc & I845_TSEG_SIZE_MASK;
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!(esmramc & TSEG_ENABLE))
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
switch (tseg_size) {
|
|
|
|
case I845_TSEG_SIZE_512K: return KB(512);
|
|
|
|
case I845_TSEG_SIZE_1M: return MB(1);
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
default:
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
WARN(1, "Unknown ESMRAMC value: %x!\n", esmramc);
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static size_t __init i85x_tseg_size(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
u8 esmramc = read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 0, I85X_ESMRAMC);
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!(esmramc & TSEG_ENABLE))
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return MB(1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static size_t __init i830_mem_size(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 0, I830_DRB3) * MB(32);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static size_t __init i85x_mem_size(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 1, I85X_DRB3) * MB(32);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* On 830/845/85x the stolen memory base isn't available in any
|
|
|
|
* register. We need to calculate it as TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
static phys_addr_t __init i830_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
|
|
|
|
size_t stolen_size)
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
return (phys_addr_t)i830_mem_size() - i830_tseg_size() - stolen_size;
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
static phys_addr_t __init i845_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
|
|
|
|
size_t stolen_size)
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
return (phys_addr_t)i830_mem_size() - i845_tseg_size() - stolen_size;
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
static phys_addr_t __init i85x_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
|
|
|
|
size_t stolen_size)
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
return (phys_addr_t)i85x_mem_size() - i85x_tseg_size() - stolen_size;
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
static phys_addr_t __init i865_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
|
|
|
|
size_t stolen_size)
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
u16 toud;
|
|
|
|
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* FIXME is the graphics stolen memory region
|
|
|
|
* always at TOUD? Ie. is it always the last
|
|
|
|
* one to be allocated by the BIOS?
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
toud = read_pci_config_16(0, 0, 0, I865_TOUD);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (phys_addr_t)toud << 16;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static phys_addr_t __init gen3_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
|
|
|
|
size_t stolen_size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 bsm;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Almost universally we can find the Graphics Base of Stolen Memory
|
|
|
|
* at register BSM (0x5c) in the igfx configuration space. On a few
|
|
|
|
* (desktop) machines this is also mirrored in the bridge device at
|
|
|
|
* different locations, or in the MCHBAR.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
bsm = read_pci_config(num, slot, func, INTEL_BSM);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (phys_addr_t)bsm & INTEL_BSM_MASK;
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static size_t __init i830_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u16 gmch_ctrl;
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
u16 gms;
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gmch_ctrl = read_pci_config_16(0, 0, 0, I830_GMCH_CTRL);
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
gms = gmch_ctrl & I830_GMCH_GMS_MASK;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (gms) {
|
|
|
|
case I830_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_512: return KB(512);
|
|
|
|
case I830_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_1024: return MB(1);
|
|
|
|
case I830_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_8192: return MB(8);
|
|
|
|
/* local memory isn't part of the normal address space */
|
|
|
|
case I830_GMCH_GMS_LOCAL: return 0;
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
default:
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
WARN(1, "Unknown GMCH_CTRL value: %x!\n", gmch_ctrl);
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
static size_t __init gen3_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u16 gmch_ctrl;
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
u16 gms;
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gmch_ctrl = read_pci_config_16(0, 0, 0, I830_GMCH_CTRL);
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
gms = gmch_ctrl & I855_GMCH_GMS_MASK;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (gms) {
|
|
|
|
case I855_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_1M: return MB(1);
|
|
|
|
case I855_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_4M: return MB(4);
|
|
|
|
case I855_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_8M: return MB(8);
|
|
|
|
case I855_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_16M: return MB(16);
|
|
|
|
case I855_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_32M: return MB(32);
|
|
|
|
case I915_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_48M: return MB(48);
|
|
|
|
case I915_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_64M: return MB(64);
|
|
|
|
case G33_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_128M: return MB(128);
|
|
|
|
case G33_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_256M: return MB(256);
|
|
|
|
case INTEL_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_96M: return MB(96);
|
|
|
|
case INTEL_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_160M:return MB(160);
|
|
|
|
case INTEL_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_224M:return MB(224);
|
|
|
|
case INTEL_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_352M:return MB(352);
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
default:
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
WARN(1, "Unknown GMCH_CTRL value: %x!\n", gmch_ctrl);
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static size_t __init gen6_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u16 gmch_ctrl;
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
u16 gms;
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gmch_ctrl = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, SNB_GMCH_CTRL);
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
gms = (gmch_ctrl >> SNB_GMCH_GMS_SHIFT) & SNB_GMCH_GMS_MASK;
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
return (size_t)gms * MB(32);
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-09 03:19:42 +08:00
|
|
|
static size_t __init gen8_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
|
2013-11-04 08:53:55 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u16 gmch_ctrl;
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
u16 gms;
|
2013-11-04 08:53:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gmch_ctrl = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, SNB_GMCH_CTRL);
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
gms = (gmch_ctrl >> BDW_GMCH_GMS_SHIFT) & BDW_GMCH_GMS_MASK;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (size_t)gms * MB(32);
|
2013-11-04 08:53:55 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-09 03:19:41 +08:00
|
|
|
static size_t __init chv_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u16 gmch_ctrl;
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
u16 gms;
|
2014-05-09 03:19:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gmch_ctrl = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, SNB_GMCH_CTRL);
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
gms = (gmch_ctrl >> SNB_GMCH_GMS_SHIFT) & SNB_GMCH_GMS_MASK;
|
2014-05-09 03:19:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* 0x0 to 0x10: 32MB increments starting at 0MB
|
|
|
|
* 0x11 to 0x16: 4MB increments starting at 8MB
|
|
|
|
* 0x17 to 0x1d: 4MB increments start at 36MB
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (gms < 0x11)
|
|
|
|
return (size_t)gms * MB(32);
|
|
|
|
else if (gms < 0x17)
|
|
|
|
return (size_t)(gms - 0x11 + 2) * MB(4);
|
2014-05-09 03:19:41 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
return (size_t)(gms - 0x17 + 9) * MB(4);
|
2014-05-09 03:19:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-06 03:28:58 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-01-10 02:02:46 +08:00
|
|
|
static size_t __init gen9_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u16 gmch_ctrl;
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
u16 gms;
|
2014-01-10 02:02:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gmch_ctrl = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, SNB_GMCH_CTRL);
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
gms = (gmch_ctrl >> BDW_GMCH_GMS_SHIFT) & BDW_GMCH_GMS_MASK;
|
2014-01-10 02:02:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
/* 0x0 to 0xef: 32MB increments starting at 0MB */
|
|
|
|
/* 0xf0 to 0xfe: 4MB increments starting at 4MB */
|
|
|
|
if (gms < 0xf0)
|
|
|
|
return (size_t)gms * MB(32);
|
2014-01-10 02:02:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2016-04-22 18:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
return (size_t)(gms - 0xf0 + 1) * MB(4);
|
2014-01-10 02:02:46 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
struct intel_early_ops {
|
|
|
|
size_t (*stolen_size)(int num, int slot, int func);
|
|
|
|
phys_addr_t (*stolen_base)(int num, int slot, int func, size_t size);
|
|
|
|
};
|
2014-01-10 02:02:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct intel_early_ops i830_early_ops __initconst = {
|
|
|
|
.stolen_base = i830_stolen_base,
|
|
|
|
.stolen_size = i830_stolen_size,
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct intel_early_ops i845_early_ops __initconst = {
|
|
|
|
.stolen_base = i845_stolen_base,
|
|
|
|
.stolen_size = i830_stolen_size,
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct intel_early_ops i85x_early_ops __initconst = {
|
|
|
|
.stolen_base = i85x_stolen_base,
|
|
|
|
.stolen_size = gen3_stolen_size,
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct intel_early_ops i865_early_ops __initconst = {
|
|
|
|
.stolen_base = i865_stolen_base,
|
|
|
|
.stolen_size = gen3_stolen_size,
|
x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen
memory would start there would place it on top of some ACPI
memory regions. So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however
looks promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory
size to be 8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT
entries are at offset 0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT
entries occupy 128KB, it looks like the stolen memory could
start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would occupy the last
128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've
determined the BIOS first allocates space for something called
TSEG (something to do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then
it allocates the graphics stolen memory below that. Accordind to
the chipset documentation TSEG has a fixed size of 1MB on 855.
So that explains the top 1MB in the e820 region. And it also
confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at the end of the the
stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the
BIOS does (TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few
differences between the registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a
few different codepaths are required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough
memory to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI
allocations will also affect the location of the stolen memory.
Fortunately there appears to be the TOUD register which may give
us the correct answer directly. But the chipset docs are a bit
unclear, so I'm not 100% sure that the graphics stolen memory is
always the last thing the BIOS steals. Someone would need to
verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far
everything looks peachy.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391628540-23072-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-06 03:28:59 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct intel_early_ops gen3_early_ops __initconst = {
|
|
|
|
.stolen_base = gen3_stolen_base,
|
|
|
|
.stolen_size = gen3_stolen_size,
|
2014-02-06 03:28:58 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct intel_early_ops gen6_early_ops __initconst = {
|
|
|
|
.stolen_base = gen3_stolen_base,
|
|
|
|
.stolen_size = gen6_stolen_size,
|
2014-02-06 03:28:58 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct intel_early_ops gen8_early_ops __initconst = {
|
|
|
|
.stolen_base = gen3_stolen_base,
|
|
|
|
.stolen_size = gen8_stolen_size,
|
2014-02-06 03:28:58 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct intel_early_ops gen9_early_ops __initconst = {
|
|
|
|
.stolen_base = gen3_stolen_base,
|
|
|
|
.stolen_size = gen9_stolen_size,
|
2014-01-10 02:02:46 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct intel_early_ops chv_early_ops __initconst = {
|
|
|
|
.stolen_base = gen3_stolen_base,
|
|
|
|
.stolen_size = chv_stolen_size,
|
2014-05-09 03:19:41 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct pci_device_id intel_early_ids[] __initconst = {
|
|
|
|
INTEL_I830_IDS(&i830_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_I845G_IDS(&i845_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_I85X_IDS(&i85x_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_I865G_IDS(&i865_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_I915G_IDS(&gen3_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_I915GM_IDS(&gen3_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_I945G_IDS(&gen3_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_I945GM_IDS(&gen3_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_VLV_M_IDS(&gen6_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_VLV_D_IDS(&gen6_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_PINEVIEW_IDS(&gen3_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_I965G_IDS(&gen3_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_G33_IDS(&gen3_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_I965GM_IDS(&gen3_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_GM45_IDS(&gen3_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_G45_IDS(&gen3_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_IRONLAKE_D_IDS(&gen3_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_IRONLAKE_M_IDS(&gen3_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_SNB_D_IDS(&gen6_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_SNB_M_IDS(&gen6_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_IVB_M_IDS(&gen6_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_IVB_D_IDS(&gen6_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_HSW_D_IDS(&gen6_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_HSW_M_IDS(&gen6_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_BDW_M_IDS(&gen8_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_BDW_D_IDS(&gen8_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_CHV_IDS(&chv_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_SKL_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_BXT_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
|
|
|
|
INTEL_KBL_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __init
|
|
|
|
intel_graphics_stolen(int num, int slot, int func,
|
|
|
|
const struct intel_early_ops *early_ops)
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-05-10 00:39:42 +08:00
|
|
|
phys_addr_t base, end;
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
size_t size;
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
size = early_ops->stolen_size(num, slot, func);
|
|
|
|
base = early_ops->stolen_base(num, slot, func, size);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!size || !base)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 00:39:42 +08:00
|
|
|
end = base + size - 1;
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_INFO "Reserving Intel graphics memory at %pa-%pa\n",
|
|
|
|
&base, &end);
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Mark this space as reserved */
|
|
|
|
e820_add_region(base, size, E820_RESERVED);
|
|
|
|
sanitize_e820_map(e820.map, ARRAY_SIZE(e820.map), &e820.nr_map);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void __init intel_graphics_quirks(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const struct intel_early_ops *early_ops;
|
|
|
|
u16 device;
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, PCI_DEVICE_ID);
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(intel_early_ids); i++) {
|
|
|
|
kernel_ulong_t driver_data = intel_early_ids[i].driver_data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (intel_early_ids[i].device != device)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
early_ops = (typeof(early_ops))driver_data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
intel_graphics_stolen(num, slot, func, early_ops);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-24 16:18:18 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __init force_disable_hpet(int num, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_HPET_TIMER
|
2015-10-19 18:35:44 +08:00
|
|
|
boot_hpet_disable = true;
|
2014-04-24 16:18:18 +08:00
|
|
|
pr_info("x86/hpet: Will disable the HPET for this platform because it's not reliable\n");
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
x86/quirks: Add early quirk to reset Apple AirPort card
The EFI firmware on Macs contains a full-fledged network stack for
downloading OS X images from osrecovery.apple.com. Unfortunately
on Macs introduced 2011 and 2012, EFI brings up the Broadcom 4331
wireless card on every boot and leaves it enabled even after
ExitBootServices has been called. The card continues to assert its IRQ
line, causing spurious interrupts if the IRQ is shared. It also corrupts
memory by DMAing received packets, allowing for remote code execution
over the air. This only stops when a driver is loaded for the wireless
card, which may be never if the driver is not installed or blacklisted.
The issue seems to be constrained to the Broadcom 4331. Chris Milsted
has verified that the newer Broadcom 4360 built into the MacBookPro11,3
(2013/2014) does not exhibit this behaviour. The chances that Apple will
ever supply a firmware fix for the older machines appear to be zero.
The solution is to reset the card on boot by writing to a reset bit in
its mmio space. This must be done as an early quirk and not as a plain
vanilla PCI quirk to successfully combat memory corruption by DMAed
packets: Matthew Garrett found out in 2012 that the packets are written
to EfiBootServicesData memory (http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/11235.html).
This type of memory is made available to the page allocator by
efi_free_boot_services(). Plain vanilla PCI quirks run much later, in
subsys initcall level. In-between a time window would be open for memory
corruption. Random crashes occurring in this time window and attributed
to DMAed packets have indeed been observed in the wild by Chris
Bainbridge.
When Matthew Garrett analyzed the memory corruption issue in 2012, he
sought to fix it with a grub quirk which transitions the card to D3hot:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=9d34bb85da56
This approach does not help users with other bootloaders and while it
may prevent DMAed packets, it does not cure the spurious interrupts
emanating from the card. Unfortunately the card's mmio space is
inaccessible in D3hot, so to reset it, we have to undo the effect of
Matthew's grub patch and transition the card back to D0.
Note that the quirk takes a few shortcuts to reduce the amount of code:
The size of BAR 0 and the location of the PM capability is identical
on all affected machines and therefore hardcoded. Only the address of
BAR 0 differs between models. Also, it is assumed that the BCMA core
currently mapped is the 802.11 core. The EFI driver seems to always take
care of this.
Michael Büsch, Bjorn Helgaas and Matt Fleming contributed feedback
towards finding the best solution to this problem.
The following should be a comprehensive list of affected models:
iMac13,1 2012 21.5" [Root Port 00:1c.3 = 8086:1e16]
iMac13,2 2012 27" [Root Port 00:1c.3 = 8086:1e16]
Macmini5,1 2011 i5 2.3 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini5,2 2011 i5 2.5 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini5,3 2011 i7 2.0 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini6,1 2012 i5 2.5 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
Macmini6,2 2012 i7 2.3 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro8,1 2011 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro8,2 2011 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro8,3 2011 17" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro9,1 2012 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro9,2 2012 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro10,1 2012 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro10,2 2012 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
For posterity, spurious interrupts caused by the Broadcom 4331 wireless
card resulted in splats like this (stacktrace omitted):
irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
handlers:
[<ffffffff81374370>] pcie_isr
[<ffffffffc0704550>] sdhci_irq [sdhci] threaded [<ffffffffc07013c0>] sdhci_thread_irq [sdhci]
[<ffffffffc0a0b960>] azx_interrupt [snd_hda_codec]
Disabling IRQ #17
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79301
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111781
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728916
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895951#c16
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009819
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098621
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149632#c5
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279130
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332732
Tested-by: Konstantin Simanov <k.simanov@stlk.ru> # [MacBookPro8,1]
Tested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> # [MacBookPro9,1]
Tested-by: Bryan Paradis <bryan.paradis@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro9,2]
Tested-by: Andrew Worsley <amworsley@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro10,1]
Tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro10,2]
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Milsted <cmilsted@redhat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 123456789abc: x86/quirks: Apply nvidia_bugs quirk only on root bus
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 123456789abc: x86/quirks: Reintroduce scanning of secondary buses
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/48d0972ac82a53d460e5fce77a07b2560db95203.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de
[ Did minor readability edits. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
#define BCM4331_MMIO_SIZE 16384
|
|
|
|
#define BCM4331_PM_CAP 0x40
|
|
|
|
#define bcma_aread32(reg) ioread32(mmio + 1 * BCMA_CORE_SIZE + reg)
|
|
|
|
#define bcma_awrite32(reg, val) iowrite32(val, mmio + 1 * BCMA_CORE_SIZE + reg)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void __init apple_airport_reset(int bus, int slot, int func)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
void __iomem *mmio;
|
|
|
|
u16 pmcsr;
|
|
|
|
u64 addr;
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!dmi_match(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Apple Inc."))
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Card may have been put into PCI_D3hot by grub quirk */
|
|
|
|
pmcsr = read_pci_config_16(bus, slot, func, BCM4331_PM_CAP + PCI_PM_CTRL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if ((pmcsr & PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK) != PCI_D0) {
|
|
|
|
pmcsr &= ~PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK;
|
|
|
|
write_pci_config_16(bus, slot, func, BCM4331_PM_CAP + PCI_PM_CTRL, pmcsr);
|
|
|
|
mdelay(10);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pmcsr = read_pci_config_16(bus, slot, func, BCM4331_PM_CAP + PCI_PM_CTRL);
|
|
|
|
if ((pmcsr & PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK) != PCI_D0) {
|
|
|
|
dev_err("Cannot power up Apple AirPort card\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
addr = read_pci_config(bus, slot, func, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
|
|
|
|
addr |= (u64)read_pci_config(bus, slot, func, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1) << 32;
|
|
|
|
addr &= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmio = early_ioremap(addr, BCM4331_MMIO_SIZE);
|
|
|
|
if (!mmio) {
|
|
|
|
dev_err("Cannot iomap Apple AirPort card\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr_info("Resetting Apple AirPort card (left enabled by EFI)\n");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; bcma_aread32(BCMA_RESET_ST) && i < 30; i++)
|
|
|
|
udelay(10);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bcma_awrite32(BCMA_RESET_CTL, BCMA_RESET_CTL_RESET);
|
|
|
|
bcma_aread32(BCMA_RESET_CTL);
|
|
|
|
udelay(1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bcma_awrite32(BCMA_RESET_CTL, 0);
|
|
|
|
bcma_aread32(BCMA_RESET_CTL);
|
|
|
|
udelay(10);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
early_iounmap(mmio, BCM4331_MMIO_SIZE);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-04-24 16:18:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-30 20:31:25 +08:00
|
|
|
#define QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE 0x1
|
|
|
|
#define QFLAG_APPLIED 0x2
|
|
|
|
#define QFLAG_DONE (QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE|QFLAG_APPLIED)
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
struct chipset {
|
2008-01-30 20:31:25 +08:00
|
|
|
u32 vendor;
|
|
|
|
u32 device;
|
|
|
|
u32 class;
|
|
|
|
u32 class_mask;
|
|
|
|
u32 flags;
|
|
|
|
void (*f)(int num, int slot, int func);
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-09 07:04:03 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct chipset early_qrk[] __initdata = {
|
2008-01-30 20:31:25 +08:00
|
|
|
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, PCI_ANY_ID,
|
|
|
|
PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI, PCI_ANY_ID, QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE, nvidia_bugs },
|
|
|
|
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID,
|
|
|
|
PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI, PCI_ANY_ID, QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE, via_bugs },
|
|
|
|
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_K8_NB,
|
|
|
|
PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, fix_hypertransport_config },
|
2008-10-07 06:11:22 +08:00
|
|
|
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP400_SMBUS,
|
|
|
|
PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_SMBUS, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, ati_bugs },
|
2008-10-15 03:01:15 +08:00
|
|
|
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_SBX00_SMBUS,
|
|
|
|
PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_SMBUS, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, ati_bugs_contd },
|
2013-04-17 04:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x3403, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST,
|
|
|
|
PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE, 0, intel_remapping_check },
|
2013-07-17 19:13:59 +08:00
|
|
|
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x3405, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST,
|
|
|
|
PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE, 0, intel_remapping_check },
|
2013-04-17 04:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x3406, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST,
|
|
|
|
PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE, 0, intel_remapping_check },
|
2013-07-27 04:32:52 +08:00
|
|
|
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA, PCI_ANY_ID,
|
2016-04-22 18:45:49 +08:00
|
|
|
QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE, intel_graphics_quirks },
|
2014-04-24 16:18:18 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2015-06-15 17:40:01 +08:00
|
|
|
* HPET on the current version of the Baytrail platform has accuracy
|
|
|
|
* problems: it will halt in deep idle state - so we disable it.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* More details can be found in section 18.10.1.3 of the datasheet:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/atom-z8000-datasheet-vol-1.pdf
|
2014-04-24 16:18:18 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0f00,
|
|
|
|
PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, force_disable_hpet},
|
x86/quirks: Add early quirk to reset Apple AirPort card
The EFI firmware on Macs contains a full-fledged network stack for
downloading OS X images from osrecovery.apple.com. Unfortunately
on Macs introduced 2011 and 2012, EFI brings up the Broadcom 4331
wireless card on every boot and leaves it enabled even after
ExitBootServices has been called. The card continues to assert its IRQ
line, causing spurious interrupts if the IRQ is shared. It also corrupts
memory by DMAing received packets, allowing for remote code execution
over the air. This only stops when a driver is loaded for the wireless
card, which may be never if the driver is not installed or blacklisted.
The issue seems to be constrained to the Broadcom 4331. Chris Milsted
has verified that the newer Broadcom 4360 built into the MacBookPro11,3
(2013/2014) does not exhibit this behaviour. The chances that Apple will
ever supply a firmware fix for the older machines appear to be zero.
The solution is to reset the card on boot by writing to a reset bit in
its mmio space. This must be done as an early quirk and not as a plain
vanilla PCI quirk to successfully combat memory corruption by DMAed
packets: Matthew Garrett found out in 2012 that the packets are written
to EfiBootServicesData memory (http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/11235.html).
This type of memory is made available to the page allocator by
efi_free_boot_services(). Plain vanilla PCI quirks run much later, in
subsys initcall level. In-between a time window would be open for memory
corruption. Random crashes occurring in this time window and attributed
to DMAed packets have indeed been observed in the wild by Chris
Bainbridge.
When Matthew Garrett analyzed the memory corruption issue in 2012, he
sought to fix it with a grub quirk which transitions the card to D3hot:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=9d34bb85da56
This approach does not help users with other bootloaders and while it
may prevent DMAed packets, it does not cure the spurious interrupts
emanating from the card. Unfortunately the card's mmio space is
inaccessible in D3hot, so to reset it, we have to undo the effect of
Matthew's grub patch and transition the card back to D0.
Note that the quirk takes a few shortcuts to reduce the amount of code:
The size of BAR 0 and the location of the PM capability is identical
on all affected machines and therefore hardcoded. Only the address of
BAR 0 differs between models. Also, it is assumed that the BCMA core
currently mapped is the 802.11 core. The EFI driver seems to always take
care of this.
Michael Büsch, Bjorn Helgaas and Matt Fleming contributed feedback
towards finding the best solution to this problem.
The following should be a comprehensive list of affected models:
iMac13,1 2012 21.5" [Root Port 00:1c.3 = 8086:1e16]
iMac13,2 2012 27" [Root Port 00:1c.3 = 8086:1e16]
Macmini5,1 2011 i5 2.3 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini5,2 2011 i5 2.5 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini5,3 2011 i7 2.0 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
Macmini6,1 2012 i5 2.5 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
Macmini6,2 2012 i7 2.3 GHz [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro8,1 2011 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro8,2 2011 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro8,3 2011 17" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1c12]
MacBookPro9,1 2012 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro9,2 2012 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro10,1 2012 15" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
MacBookPro10,2 2012 13" [Root Port 00:1c.1 = 8086:1e12]
For posterity, spurious interrupts caused by the Broadcom 4331 wireless
card resulted in splats like this (stacktrace omitted):
irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
handlers:
[<ffffffff81374370>] pcie_isr
[<ffffffffc0704550>] sdhci_irq [sdhci] threaded [<ffffffffc07013c0>] sdhci_thread_irq [sdhci]
[<ffffffffc0a0b960>] azx_interrupt [snd_hda_codec]
Disabling IRQ #17
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79301
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111781
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728916
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895951#c16
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009819
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098621
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149632#c5
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279130
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332732
Tested-by: Konstantin Simanov <k.simanov@stlk.ru> # [MacBookPro8,1]
Tested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> # [MacBookPro9,1]
Tested-by: Bryan Paradis <bryan.paradis@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro9,2]
Tested-by: Andrew Worsley <amworsley@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro10,1]
Tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> # [MacBookPro10,2]
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Milsted <cmilsted@redhat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 123456789abc: x86/quirks: Apply nvidia_bugs quirk only on root bus
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 123456789abc: x86/quirks: Reintroduce scanning of secondary buses
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/48d0972ac82a53d460e5fce77a07b2560db95203.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de
[ Did minor readability edits. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4331,
|
|
|
|
PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_OTHER, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, apple_airport_reset},
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
x86/quirks: Reintroduce scanning of secondary buses
We used to scan secondary buses until the following commit that
was applied in 2009:
8659c406ade3 ("x86: only scan the root bus in early PCI quirks")
which commit constrained early quirks to the root bus only. Its
motivation was to prevent application of the nvidia_bugs quirk
on secondary buses.
We're about to add a quirk to reset the Broadcom 4331 wireless card on
2011/2012 Macs, which is located on a secondary bus behind a PCIe root
port. To facilitate that, reintroduce scanning of secondary buses.
The commit message of 8659c406ade3 notes that scanning only the root bus
"saves quite some unnecessary scanning work". The algorithm used prior
to 8659c406ade3 was particularly time consuming because it scanned
buses 0 to 31 brute force. To avoid lengthening boot time, employ a
recursive strategy which only scans buses that are actually reachable
from the root bus.
Yinghai Lu pointed out that the secondary bus number read from a
bridge's config space may be invalid, in particular a value of 0 would
cause an infinite loop. The PCI core goes beyond that and recurses to a
child bus only if its bus number is greater than the parent bus number
(see pci_scan_bridge()). Since the root bus is numbered 0, this implies
that secondary buses may not be 0. Do the same on early scanning.
If this algorithm is found to significantly impact boot time or cause
infinite loops on broken hardware, it would be possible to limit its
recursion depth: The Broadcom 4331 quirk applies at depth 1, all others
at depth 0, so the bus need not be scanned deeper than that for now. An
alternative approach would be to revert to scanning only the root bus,
and apply the Broadcom 4331 quirk to the root ports 8086:1c12, 8086:1e12
and 8086:1e16. Apple always positioned the card behind either of these
three ports. The quirk would then check presence of the card in slot 0
below the root port and do its deed.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f0daa70dac1a9b2483abdb31887173eb6ab77bdf.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __init early_pci_scan_bus(int bus);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-17 06:29:45 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* check_dev_quirk - apply early quirks to a given PCI device
|
|
|
|
* @num: bus number
|
|
|
|
* @slot: slot number
|
|
|
|
* @func: PCI function
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Check the vendor & device ID against the early quirks table.
|
|
|
|
*
|
x86/quirks: Reintroduce scanning of secondary buses
We used to scan secondary buses until the following commit that
was applied in 2009:
8659c406ade3 ("x86: only scan the root bus in early PCI quirks")
which commit constrained early quirks to the root bus only. Its
motivation was to prevent application of the nvidia_bugs quirk
on secondary buses.
We're about to add a quirk to reset the Broadcom 4331 wireless card on
2011/2012 Macs, which is located on a secondary bus behind a PCIe root
port. To facilitate that, reintroduce scanning of secondary buses.
The commit message of 8659c406ade3 notes that scanning only the root bus
"saves quite some unnecessary scanning work". The algorithm used prior
to 8659c406ade3 was particularly time consuming because it scanned
buses 0 to 31 brute force. To avoid lengthening boot time, employ a
recursive strategy which only scans buses that are actually reachable
from the root bus.
Yinghai Lu pointed out that the secondary bus number read from a
bridge's config space may be invalid, in particular a value of 0 would
cause an infinite loop. The PCI core goes beyond that and recurses to a
child bus only if its bus number is greater than the parent bus number
(see pci_scan_bridge()). Since the root bus is numbered 0, this implies
that secondary buses may not be 0. Do the same on early scanning.
If this algorithm is found to significantly impact boot time or cause
infinite loops on broken hardware, it would be possible to limit its
recursion depth: The Broadcom 4331 quirk applies at depth 1, all others
at depth 0, so the bus need not be scanned deeper than that for now. An
alternative approach would be to revert to scanning only the root bus,
and apply the Broadcom 4331 quirk to the root ports 8086:1c12, 8086:1e12
and 8086:1e16. Apple always positioned the card behind either of these
three ports. The quirk would then check presence of the card in slot 0
below the root port and do its deed.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f0daa70dac1a9b2483abdb31887173eb6ab77bdf.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
* If the device is single function, let early_pci_scan_bus() know so we don't
|
2008-06-17 06:29:45 +08:00
|
|
|
* poke at this device again.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int __init check_dev_quirk(int num, int slot, int func)
|
2008-01-30 20:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u16 class;
|
|
|
|
u16 vendor;
|
|
|
|
u16 device;
|
|
|
|
u8 type;
|
x86/quirks: Reintroduce scanning of secondary buses
We used to scan secondary buses until the following commit that
was applied in 2009:
8659c406ade3 ("x86: only scan the root bus in early PCI quirks")
which commit constrained early quirks to the root bus only. Its
motivation was to prevent application of the nvidia_bugs quirk
on secondary buses.
We're about to add a quirk to reset the Broadcom 4331 wireless card on
2011/2012 Macs, which is located on a secondary bus behind a PCIe root
port. To facilitate that, reintroduce scanning of secondary buses.
The commit message of 8659c406ade3 notes that scanning only the root bus
"saves quite some unnecessary scanning work". The algorithm used prior
to 8659c406ade3 was particularly time consuming because it scanned
buses 0 to 31 brute force. To avoid lengthening boot time, employ a
recursive strategy which only scans buses that are actually reachable
from the root bus.
Yinghai Lu pointed out that the secondary bus number read from a
bridge's config space may be invalid, in particular a value of 0 would
cause an infinite loop. The PCI core goes beyond that and recurses to a
child bus only if its bus number is greater than the parent bus number
(see pci_scan_bridge()). Since the root bus is numbered 0, this implies
that secondary buses may not be 0. Do the same on early scanning.
If this algorithm is found to significantly impact boot time or cause
infinite loops on broken hardware, it would be possible to limit its
recursion depth: The Broadcom 4331 quirk applies at depth 1, all others
at depth 0, so the bus need not be scanned deeper than that for now. An
alternative approach would be to revert to scanning only the root bus,
and apply the Broadcom 4331 quirk to the root ports 8086:1c12, 8086:1e12
and 8086:1e16. Apple always positioned the card behind either of these
three ports. The quirk would then check presence of the card in slot 0
below the root port and do its deed.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f0daa70dac1a9b2483abdb31887173eb6ab77bdf.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
u8 sec;
|
2008-01-30 20:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, PCI_CLASS_DEVICE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (class == 0xffff)
|
2008-06-17 06:29:45 +08:00
|
|
|
return -1; /* no class, treat as single function */
|
2008-01-30 20:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vendor = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, PCI_VENDOR_ID);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, PCI_DEVICE_ID);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; early_qrk[i].f != NULL; i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (((early_qrk[i].vendor == PCI_ANY_ID) ||
|
|
|
|
(early_qrk[i].vendor == vendor)) &&
|
|
|
|
((early_qrk[i].device == PCI_ANY_ID) ||
|
|
|
|
(early_qrk[i].device == device)) &&
|
|
|
|
(!((early_qrk[i].class ^ class) &
|
|
|
|
early_qrk[i].class_mask))) {
|
|
|
|
if ((early_qrk[i].flags &
|
|
|
|
QFLAG_DONE) != QFLAG_DONE)
|
|
|
|
early_qrk[i].f(num, slot, func);
|
|
|
|
early_qrk[i].flags |= QFLAG_APPLIED;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type = read_pci_config_byte(num, slot, func,
|
|
|
|
PCI_HEADER_TYPE);
|
x86/quirks: Reintroduce scanning of secondary buses
We used to scan secondary buses until the following commit that
was applied in 2009:
8659c406ade3 ("x86: only scan the root bus in early PCI quirks")
which commit constrained early quirks to the root bus only. Its
motivation was to prevent application of the nvidia_bugs quirk
on secondary buses.
We're about to add a quirk to reset the Broadcom 4331 wireless card on
2011/2012 Macs, which is located on a secondary bus behind a PCIe root
port. To facilitate that, reintroduce scanning of secondary buses.
The commit message of 8659c406ade3 notes that scanning only the root bus
"saves quite some unnecessary scanning work". The algorithm used prior
to 8659c406ade3 was particularly time consuming because it scanned
buses 0 to 31 brute force. To avoid lengthening boot time, employ a
recursive strategy which only scans buses that are actually reachable
from the root bus.
Yinghai Lu pointed out that the secondary bus number read from a
bridge's config space may be invalid, in particular a value of 0 would
cause an infinite loop. The PCI core goes beyond that and recurses to a
child bus only if its bus number is greater than the parent bus number
(see pci_scan_bridge()). Since the root bus is numbered 0, this implies
that secondary buses may not be 0. Do the same on early scanning.
If this algorithm is found to significantly impact boot time or cause
infinite loops on broken hardware, it would be possible to limit its
recursion depth: The Broadcom 4331 quirk applies at depth 1, all others
at depth 0, so the bus need not be scanned deeper than that for now. An
alternative approach would be to revert to scanning only the root bus,
and apply the Broadcom 4331 quirk to the root ports 8086:1c12, 8086:1e12
and 8086:1e16. Apple always positioned the card behind either of these
three ports. The quirk would then check presence of the card in slot 0
below the root port and do its deed.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f0daa70dac1a9b2483abdb31887173eb6ab77bdf.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if ((type & 0x7f) == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
|
|
|
|
sec = read_pci_config_byte(num, slot, func, PCI_SECONDARY_BUS);
|
|
|
|
if (sec > num)
|
|
|
|
early_pci_scan_bus(sec);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-30 20:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!(type & 0x80))
|
2008-06-17 06:29:45 +08:00
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2008-01-30 20:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
x86/quirks: Reintroduce scanning of secondary buses
We used to scan secondary buses until the following commit that
was applied in 2009:
8659c406ade3 ("x86: only scan the root bus in early PCI quirks")
which commit constrained early quirks to the root bus only. Its
motivation was to prevent application of the nvidia_bugs quirk
on secondary buses.
We're about to add a quirk to reset the Broadcom 4331 wireless card on
2011/2012 Macs, which is located on a secondary bus behind a PCIe root
port. To facilitate that, reintroduce scanning of secondary buses.
The commit message of 8659c406ade3 notes that scanning only the root bus
"saves quite some unnecessary scanning work". The algorithm used prior
to 8659c406ade3 was particularly time consuming because it scanned
buses 0 to 31 brute force. To avoid lengthening boot time, employ a
recursive strategy which only scans buses that are actually reachable
from the root bus.
Yinghai Lu pointed out that the secondary bus number read from a
bridge's config space may be invalid, in particular a value of 0 would
cause an infinite loop. The PCI core goes beyond that and recurses to a
child bus only if its bus number is greater than the parent bus number
(see pci_scan_bridge()). Since the root bus is numbered 0, this implies
that secondary buses may not be 0. Do the same on early scanning.
If this algorithm is found to significantly impact boot time or cause
infinite loops on broken hardware, it would be possible to limit its
recursion depth: The Broadcom 4331 quirk applies at depth 1, all others
at depth 0, so the bus need not be scanned deeper than that for now. An
alternative approach would be to revert to scanning only the root bus,
and apply the Broadcom 4331 quirk to the root ports 8086:1c12, 8086:1e12
and 8086:1e16. Apple always positioned the card behind either of these
three ports. The quirk would then check presence of the card in slot 0
below the root port and do its deed.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f0daa70dac1a9b2483abdb31887173eb6ab77bdf.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __init early_pci_scan_bus(int bus)
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-01-10 04:17:39 +08:00
|
|
|
int slot, func;
|
2006-09-26 16:52:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Poor man's PCI discovery */
|
2009-01-10 04:17:39 +08:00
|
|
|
for (slot = 0; slot < 32; slot++)
|
|
|
|
for (func = 0; func < 8; func++) {
|
|
|
|
/* Only probe function 0 on single fn devices */
|
x86/quirks: Reintroduce scanning of secondary buses
We used to scan secondary buses until the following commit that
was applied in 2009:
8659c406ade3 ("x86: only scan the root bus in early PCI quirks")
which commit constrained early quirks to the root bus only. Its
motivation was to prevent application of the nvidia_bugs quirk
on secondary buses.
We're about to add a quirk to reset the Broadcom 4331 wireless card on
2011/2012 Macs, which is located on a secondary bus behind a PCIe root
port. To facilitate that, reintroduce scanning of secondary buses.
The commit message of 8659c406ade3 notes that scanning only the root bus
"saves quite some unnecessary scanning work". The algorithm used prior
to 8659c406ade3 was particularly time consuming because it scanned
buses 0 to 31 brute force. To avoid lengthening boot time, employ a
recursive strategy which only scans buses that are actually reachable
from the root bus.
Yinghai Lu pointed out that the secondary bus number read from a
bridge's config space may be invalid, in particular a value of 0 would
cause an infinite loop. The PCI core goes beyond that and recurses to a
child bus only if its bus number is greater than the parent bus number
(see pci_scan_bridge()). Since the root bus is numbered 0, this implies
that secondary buses may not be 0. Do the same on early scanning.
If this algorithm is found to significantly impact boot time or cause
infinite loops on broken hardware, it would be possible to limit its
recursion depth: The Broadcom 4331 quirk applies at depth 1, all others
at depth 0, so the bus need not be scanned deeper than that for now. An
alternative approach would be to revert to scanning only the root bus,
and apply the Broadcom 4331 quirk to the root ports 8086:1c12, 8086:1e12
and 8086:1e16. Apple always positioned the card behind either of these
three ports. The quirk would then check presence of the card in slot 0
below the root port and do its deed.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f0daa70dac1a9b2483abdb31887173eb6ab77bdf.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
if (check_dev_quirk(bus, slot, func))
|
2009-01-10 04:17:39 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-09-26 16:52:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
x86/quirks: Reintroduce scanning of secondary buses
We used to scan secondary buses until the following commit that
was applied in 2009:
8659c406ade3 ("x86: only scan the root bus in early PCI quirks")
which commit constrained early quirks to the root bus only. Its
motivation was to prevent application of the nvidia_bugs quirk
on secondary buses.
We're about to add a quirk to reset the Broadcom 4331 wireless card on
2011/2012 Macs, which is located on a secondary bus behind a PCIe root
port. To facilitate that, reintroduce scanning of secondary buses.
The commit message of 8659c406ade3 notes that scanning only the root bus
"saves quite some unnecessary scanning work". The algorithm used prior
to 8659c406ade3 was particularly time consuming because it scanned
buses 0 to 31 brute force. To avoid lengthening boot time, employ a
recursive strategy which only scans buses that are actually reachable
from the root bus.
Yinghai Lu pointed out that the secondary bus number read from a
bridge's config space may be invalid, in particular a value of 0 would
cause an infinite loop. The PCI core goes beyond that and recurses to a
child bus only if its bus number is greater than the parent bus number
(see pci_scan_bridge()). Since the root bus is numbered 0, this implies
that secondary buses may not be 0. Do the same on early scanning.
If this algorithm is found to significantly impact boot time or cause
infinite loops on broken hardware, it would be possible to limit its
recursion depth: The Broadcom 4331 quirk applies at depth 1, all others
at depth 0, so the bus need not be scanned deeper than that for now. An
alternative approach would be to revert to scanning only the root bus,
and apply the Broadcom 4331 quirk to the root ports 8086:1c12, 8086:1e12
and 8086:1e16. Apple always positioned the card behind either of these
three ports. The quirk would then check presence of the card in slot 0
below the root port and do its deed.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f0daa70dac1a9b2483abdb31887173eb6ab77bdf.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-12 18:31:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void __init early_quirks(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (!early_pci_allowed())
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
early_pci_scan_bus(0);
|
|
|
|
}
|