openkylin
/
linux
mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
9
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
linux/arch/powerpc/lib/ldstfp.S

374 lines
6.0 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
/*
* Floating-point, VMX/Altivec and VSX loads and stores
* for use in instruction emulation.
*
* Copyright 2010 Paul Mackerras, IBM Corp. <paulus@au1.ibm.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*/
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <asm/ppc_asm.h>
#include <asm/ppc-opcode.h>
#include <asm/reg.h>
#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FPU
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
#define STKFRM (PPC_MIN_STKFRM + 16)
.macro inst32 op
reg = 0
.rept 32
20: \op reg,0,r4
b 3f
powerpc: EX_TABLE macro for exception tables This macro is taken from s390, and allows more flexibility in changing exception table format. mpe: Put it in ppc_asm.h and only define one version using stringinfy_in_c(). Add some empty definitions and headers to keep the selftests happy. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-10-13 13:42:53 +08:00
EX_TABLE(20b,99f)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
reg = reg + 1
.endr
.endm
/* Get the contents of frN into fr0; N is in r3. */
_GLOBAL(get_fpr)
mflr r0
rlwinm r3,r3,3,0xf8
bcl 20,31,1f
blr /* fr0 is already in fr0 */
nop
reg = 1
.rept 31
fmr fr0,reg
blr
reg = reg + 1
.endr
1: mflr r5
add r5,r3,r5
mtctr r5
mtlr r0
bctr
/* Put the contents of fr0 into frN; N is in r3. */
_GLOBAL(put_fpr)
mflr r0
rlwinm r3,r3,3,0xf8
bcl 20,31,1f
blr /* fr0 is already in fr0 */
nop
reg = 1
.rept 31
fmr reg,fr0
blr
reg = reg + 1
.endr
1: mflr r5
add r5,r3,r5
mtctr r5
mtlr r0
bctr
/* Load FP reg N from float at *p. N is in r3, p in r4. */
_GLOBAL(do_lfs)
PPC_STLU r1,-STKFRM(r1)
mflr r0
PPC_STL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mfmsr r6
ori r7,r6,MSR_FP
cmpwi cr7,r3,0
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r7)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
beq cr7,1f
stfd fr0,STKFRM-16(r1)
1: li r9,-EFAULT
2: lfs fr0,0(r4)
li r9,0
3: bl put_fpr
beq cr7,4f
lfd fr0,STKFRM-16(r1)
4: PPC_LL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mtlr r0
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r6)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
mr r3,r9
addi r1,r1,STKFRM
blr
powerpc: EX_TABLE macro for exception tables This macro is taken from s390, and allows more flexibility in changing exception table format. mpe: Put it in ppc_asm.h and only define one version using stringinfy_in_c(). Add some empty definitions and headers to keep the selftests happy. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-10-13 13:42:53 +08:00
EX_TABLE(2b,3b)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
/* Load FP reg N from double at *p. N is in r3, p in r4. */
_GLOBAL(do_lfd)
PPC_STLU r1,-STKFRM(r1)
mflr r0
PPC_STL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mfmsr r6
ori r7,r6,MSR_FP
cmpwi cr7,r3,0
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r7)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
beq cr7,1f
stfd fr0,STKFRM-16(r1)
1: li r9,-EFAULT
2: lfd fr0,0(r4)
li r9,0
3: beq cr7,4f
bl put_fpr
lfd fr0,STKFRM-16(r1)
4: PPC_LL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mtlr r0
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r6)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
mr r3,r9
addi r1,r1,STKFRM
blr
powerpc: EX_TABLE macro for exception tables This macro is taken from s390, and allows more flexibility in changing exception table format. mpe: Put it in ppc_asm.h and only define one version using stringinfy_in_c(). Add some empty definitions and headers to keep the selftests happy. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-10-13 13:42:53 +08:00
EX_TABLE(2b,3b)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
/* Store FP reg N to float at *p. N is in r3, p in r4. */
_GLOBAL(do_stfs)
PPC_STLU r1,-STKFRM(r1)
mflr r0
PPC_STL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mfmsr r6
ori r7,r6,MSR_FP
cmpwi cr7,r3,0
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r7)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
beq cr7,1f
stfd fr0,STKFRM-16(r1)
bl get_fpr
1: li r9,-EFAULT
2: stfs fr0,0(r4)
li r9,0
3: beq cr7,4f
lfd fr0,STKFRM-16(r1)
4: PPC_LL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mtlr r0
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r6)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
mr r3,r9
addi r1,r1,STKFRM
blr
powerpc: EX_TABLE macro for exception tables This macro is taken from s390, and allows more flexibility in changing exception table format. mpe: Put it in ppc_asm.h and only define one version using stringinfy_in_c(). Add some empty definitions and headers to keep the selftests happy. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-10-13 13:42:53 +08:00
EX_TABLE(2b,3b)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
/* Store FP reg N to double at *p. N is in r3, p in r4. */
_GLOBAL(do_stfd)
PPC_STLU r1,-STKFRM(r1)
mflr r0
PPC_STL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mfmsr r6
ori r7,r6,MSR_FP
cmpwi cr7,r3,0
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r7)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
beq cr7,1f
stfd fr0,STKFRM-16(r1)
bl get_fpr
1: li r9,-EFAULT
2: stfd fr0,0(r4)
li r9,0
3: beq cr7,4f
lfd fr0,STKFRM-16(r1)
4: PPC_LL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mtlr r0
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r6)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
mr r3,r9
addi r1,r1,STKFRM
blr
powerpc: EX_TABLE macro for exception tables This macro is taken from s390, and allows more flexibility in changing exception table format. mpe: Put it in ppc_asm.h and only define one version using stringinfy_in_c(). Add some empty definitions and headers to keep the selftests happy. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-10-13 13:42:53 +08:00
EX_TABLE(2b,3b)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
/* Get the contents of vrN into v0; N is in r3. */
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
_GLOBAL(get_vr)
mflr r0
rlwinm r3,r3,3,0xf8
bcl 20,31,1f
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
blr /* v0 is already in v0 */
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
nop
reg = 1
.rept 31
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
vor v0,reg,reg /* assembler doesn't know vmr? */
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
blr
reg = reg + 1
.endr
1: mflr r5
add r5,r3,r5
mtctr r5
mtlr r0
bctr
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
/* Put the contents of v0 into vrN; N is in r3. */
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
_GLOBAL(put_vr)
mflr r0
rlwinm r3,r3,3,0xf8
bcl 20,31,1f
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
blr /* v0 is already in v0 */
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
nop
reg = 1
.rept 31
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
vor reg,v0,v0
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
blr
reg = reg + 1
.endr
1: mflr r5
add r5,r3,r5
mtctr r5
mtlr r0
bctr
/* Load vector reg N from *p. N is in r3, p in r4. */
_GLOBAL(do_lvx)
PPC_STLU r1,-STKFRM(r1)
mflr r0
PPC_STL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mfmsr r6
oris r7,r6,MSR_VEC@h
cmpwi cr7,r3,0
li r8,STKFRM-16
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r7)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
beq cr7,1f
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
stvx v0,r1,r8
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
1: li r9,-EFAULT
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
2: lvx v0,0,r4
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
li r9,0
3: beq cr7,4f
bl put_vr
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
lvx v0,r1,r8
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
4: PPC_LL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mtlr r0
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r6)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
mr r3,r9
addi r1,r1,STKFRM
blr
powerpc: EX_TABLE macro for exception tables This macro is taken from s390, and allows more flexibility in changing exception table format. mpe: Put it in ppc_asm.h and only define one version using stringinfy_in_c(). Add some empty definitions and headers to keep the selftests happy. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-10-13 13:42:53 +08:00
EX_TABLE(2b,3b)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
/* Store vector reg N to *p. N is in r3, p in r4. */
_GLOBAL(do_stvx)
PPC_STLU r1,-STKFRM(r1)
mflr r0
PPC_STL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mfmsr r6
oris r7,r6,MSR_VEC@h
cmpwi cr7,r3,0
li r8,STKFRM-16
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r7)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
beq cr7,1f
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
stvx v0,r1,r8
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
bl get_vr
1: li r9,-EFAULT
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
2: stvx v0,0,r4
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
li r9,0
3: beq cr7,4f
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
lvx v0,r1,r8
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
4: PPC_LL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mtlr r0
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r6)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
mr r3,r9
addi r1,r1,STKFRM
blr
powerpc: EX_TABLE macro for exception tables This macro is taken from s390, and allows more flexibility in changing exception table format. mpe: Put it in ppc_asm.h and only define one version using stringinfy_in_c(). Add some empty definitions and headers to keep the selftests happy. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-10-13 13:42:53 +08:00
EX_TABLE(2b,3b)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
#endif /* CONFIG_ALTIVEC */
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
powerpc: Change vsrX register defines to vsX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VSX register definitions - the kernel uses vsrX whereas gcc uses vsX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:23 +08:00
/* Get the contents of vsN into vs0; N is in r3. */
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
_GLOBAL(get_vsr)
mflr r0
rlwinm r3,r3,3,0x1f8
bcl 20,31,1f
powerpc: Change vsrX register defines to vsX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VSX register definitions - the kernel uses vsrX whereas gcc uses vsX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:23 +08:00
blr /* vs0 is already in vs0 */
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
nop
reg = 1
.rept 63
XXLOR(0,reg,reg)
blr
reg = reg + 1
.endr
1: mflr r5
add r5,r3,r5
mtctr r5
mtlr r0
bctr
powerpc: Change vsrX register defines to vsX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VSX register definitions - the kernel uses vsrX whereas gcc uses vsX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:23 +08:00
/* Put the contents of vs0 into vsN; N is in r3. */
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
_GLOBAL(put_vsr)
mflr r0
rlwinm r3,r3,3,0x1f8
bcl 20,31,1f
powerpc: Change vrX register defines to vX to match gcc and glibc As our various loops (copy, string, crypto etc) get more complicated, we want to share implementations between userspace (eg glibc) and the kernel. We also want to write userspace test harnesses to put in tools/testing/selftest. One gratuitous difference between userspace and the kernel is the VMX register definitions - the kernel uses vrX whereas both gcc and glibc use vX. Change the kernel to match userspace. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-02-10 06:51:22 +08:00
blr /* v0 is already in v0 */
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
nop
reg = 1
.rept 63
XXLOR(reg,0,0)
blr
reg = reg + 1
.endr
1: mflr r5
add r5,r3,r5
mtctr r5
mtlr r0
bctr
/* Load VSX reg N from vector doubleword *p. N is in r3, p in r4. */
_GLOBAL(do_lxvd2x)
PPC_STLU r1,-STKFRM(r1)
mflr r0
PPC_STL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mfmsr r6
oris r7,r6,MSR_VSX@h
cmpwi cr7,r3,0
li r8,STKFRM-16
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r7)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
beq cr7,1f
powerpc: Fix usage of register macros getting ready for %r0 change Anything that uses a constructed instruction (ie. from ppc-opcode.h), need to use the new R0 macro, as %r0 is not going to work. Also convert usages of macros where we are just determining an offset (usually for a load/store), like: std r14,STK_REG(r14)(r1) Can't use STK_REG(r14) as %r14 doesn't work in the STK_REG macro since it's just calculating an offset. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-06-25 21:33:10 +08:00
STXVD2X(0,R1,R8)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
1: li r9,-EFAULT
powerpc: Fixes for instructions not using correct register naming These macros are using integers where they could be using logical names since they take registers. We are going to enforce this soon, so fix these up now. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-06-25 21:33:18 +08:00
2: LXVD2X(0,R0,R4)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
li r9,0
3: beq cr7,4f
bl put_vsr
powerpc: Fix usage of register macros getting ready for %r0 change Anything that uses a constructed instruction (ie. from ppc-opcode.h), need to use the new R0 macro, as %r0 is not going to work. Also convert usages of macros where we are just determining an offset (usually for a load/store), like: std r14,STK_REG(r14)(r1) Can't use STK_REG(r14) as %r14 doesn't work in the STK_REG macro since it's just calculating an offset. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-06-25 21:33:10 +08:00
LXVD2X(0,R1,R8)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
4: PPC_LL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mtlr r0
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r6)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
mr r3,r9
addi r1,r1,STKFRM
blr
powerpc: EX_TABLE macro for exception tables This macro is taken from s390, and allows more flexibility in changing exception table format. mpe: Put it in ppc_asm.h and only define one version using stringinfy_in_c(). Add some empty definitions and headers to keep the selftests happy. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-10-13 13:42:53 +08:00
EX_TABLE(2b,3b)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
/* Store VSX reg N to vector doubleword *p. N is in r3, p in r4. */
_GLOBAL(do_stxvd2x)
PPC_STLU r1,-STKFRM(r1)
mflr r0
PPC_STL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mfmsr r6
oris r7,r6,MSR_VSX@h
cmpwi cr7,r3,0
li r8,STKFRM-16
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r7)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
beq cr7,1f
powerpc: Fix usage of register macros getting ready for %r0 change Anything that uses a constructed instruction (ie. from ppc-opcode.h), need to use the new R0 macro, as %r0 is not going to work. Also convert usages of macros where we are just determining an offset (usually for a load/store), like: std r14,STK_REG(r14)(r1) Can't use STK_REG(r14) as %r14 doesn't work in the STK_REG macro since it's just calculating an offset. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-06-25 21:33:10 +08:00
STXVD2X(0,R1,R8)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
bl get_vsr
1: li r9,-EFAULT
powerpc: Fixes for instructions not using correct register naming These macros are using integers where they could be using logical names since they take registers. We are going to enforce this soon, so fix these up now. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-06-25 21:33:18 +08:00
2: STXVD2X(0,R0,R4)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
li r9,0
3: beq cr7,4f
powerpc: Fix usage of register macros getting ready for %r0 change Anything that uses a constructed instruction (ie. from ppc-opcode.h), need to use the new R0 macro, as %r0 is not going to work. Also convert usages of macros where we are just determining an offset (usually for a load/store), like: std r14,STK_REG(r14)(r1) Can't use STK_REG(r14) as %r14 doesn't work in the STK_REG macro since it's just calculating an offset. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-06-25 21:33:10 +08:00
LXVD2X(0,R1,R8)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
4: PPC_LL r0,STKFRM+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
mtlr r0
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
MTMSRD(r6)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
isync
mr r3,r9
addi r1,r1,STKFRM
blr
powerpc: EX_TABLE macro for exception tables This macro is taken from s390, and allows more flexibility in changing exception table format. mpe: Put it in ppc_asm.h and only define one version using stringinfy_in_c(). Add some empty definitions and headers to keep the selftests happy. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-10-13 13:42:53 +08:00
EX_TABLE(2b,3b)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 12:48:58 +08:00
#endif /* CONFIG_VSX */
powerpc: mtmsrd not defined Replace the BOOK3S_64 specific mtmsrd with the generic MTMSRD macro. Only enable ldstfp when CONFIG_PPC_FPU is set. Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2010-09-01 15:21:21 +08:00
#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_FPU */