openkylin
/
linux
mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
9
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
linux/net/bpf/test_run.c

342 lines
7.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
/* Copyright (c) 2017 Facebook
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation.
*/
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
bpf: add tests for direct packet access from CGROUP_SKB Tests are added to make sure CGROUP_SKB cannot access: tc_classid, data_meta, flow_keys and can read and write: mark, prority, and cb[0-4] and can read other fields. To make selftest with skb->sk work, a dummy sk is added in bpf_prog_test_run_skb(). Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-10-20 00:57:58 +08:00
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <net/tcp.h>
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. See recent discussion: http://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAH3MdRWHr4N8jei8jxDppXjmw-Nw=puNDLbu1dQOFQHxfU2onA@mail.gmail.com I'll follow up with the same fix bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector in bpf-next. Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-13 07:42:38 +08:00
static int bpf_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx, u32 repeat,
u32 *retval, u32 *time)
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
{
bpf: extend cgroup bpf core to allow multiple cgroup storage types In order to introduce per-cpu cgroup storage, let's generalize bpf cgroup core to support multiple cgroup storage types. Potentially, per-node cgroup storage can be added later. This commit is mostly a formal change that replaces cgroup_storage pointer with a array of cgroup_storage pointers. It doesn't actually introduce a new storage type, it will be done later. Each bpf program is now able to have one cgroup storage of each type. Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-09-28 22:45:36 +08:00
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE] = { 0 };
enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
u64 time_start, time_spent = 0;
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. See recent discussion: http://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAH3MdRWHr4N8jei8jxDppXjmw-Nw=puNDLbu1dQOFQHxfU2onA@mail.gmail.com I'll follow up with the same fix bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector in bpf-next. Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-13 07:42:38 +08:00
int ret = 0;
bpf: refactor bpf_test_run() to separate own failures and test program result After commit f42ee093be29 ("bpf/test_run: support cgroup local storage") the bpf_test_run() function may fail with -ENOMEM, if it's not possible to allocate memory for a cgroup local storage. This error shouldn't be mixed with the return value of the testing program. Let's add an additional argument with a pointer where to store the testing program's result; and make bpf_test_run() return either 0 or -ENOMEM. Fixes: f42ee093be29 ("bpf/test_run: support cgroup local storage") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-02 02:39:44 +08:00
u32 i;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
bpf: extend cgroup bpf core to allow multiple cgroup storage types In order to introduce per-cpu cgroup storage, let's generalize bpf cgroup core to support multiple cgroup storage types. Potentially, per-node cgroup storage can be added later. This commit is mostly a formal change that replaces cgroup_storage pointer with a array of cgroup_storage pointers. It doesn't actually introduce a new storage type, it will be done later. Each bpf program is now able to have one cgroup storage of each type. Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-09-28 22:45:36 +08:00
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype) {
storage[stype] = bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(prog, stype);
if (IS_ERR(storage[stype])) {
storage[stype] = NULL;
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype)
bpf_cgroup_storage_free(storage[stype]);
return -ENOMEM;
}
}
bpf/test_run: support cgroup local storage Allocate a temporary cgroup storage to use for bpf program test runs. Because the test program is not actually attached to a cgroup, the storage is allocated manually just for the execution of the bpf program. If the program is executed multiple times, the storage is not zeroed on each run, emulating multiple runs of the program, attached to a real cgroup. Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-08-03 05:27:27 +08:00
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
if (!repeat)
repeat = 1;
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. See recent discussion: http://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAH3MdRWHr4N8jei8jxDppXjmw-Nw=puNDLbu1dQOFQHxfU2onA@mail.gmail.com I'll follow up with the same fix bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector in bpf-next. Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-13 07:42:38 +08:00
rcu_read_lock();
preempt_disable();
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
time_start = ktime_get_ns();
for (i = 0; i < repeat; i++) {
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. See recent discussion: http://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAH3MdRWHr4N8jei8jxDppXjmw-Nw=puNDLbu1dQOFQHxfU2onA@mail.gmail.com I'll follow up with the same fix bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector in bpf-next. Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-13 07:42:38 +08:00
bpf_cgroup_storage_set(storage);
*retval = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx);
if (signal_pending(current)) {
ret = -EINTR;
break;
}
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
if (need_resched()) {
time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start;
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. See recent discussion: http://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAH3MdRWHr4N8jei8jxDppXjmw-Nw=puNDLbu1dQOFQHxfU2onA@mail.gmail.com I'll follow up with the same fix bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector in bpf-next. Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-13 07:42:38 +08:00
preempt_enable();
rcu_read_unlock();
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
cond_resched();
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. See recent discussion: http://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAH3MdRWHr4N8jei8jxDppXjmw-Nw=puNDLbu1dQOFQHxfU2onA@mail.gmail.com I'll follow up with the same fix bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector in bpf-next. Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-13 07:42:38 +08:00
rcu_read_lock();
preempt_disable();
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
time_start = ktime_get_ns();
}
}
time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start;
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. See recent discussion: http://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAH3MdRWHr4N8jei8jxDppXjmw-Nw=puNDLbu1dQOFQHxfU2onA@mail.gmail.com I'll follow up with the same fix bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector in bpf-next. Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-13 07:42:38 +08:00
preempt_enable();
rcu_read_unlock();
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
do_div(time_spent, repeat);
*time = time_spent > U32_MAX ? U32_MAX : (u32)time_spent;
bpf: extend cgroup bpf core to allow multiple cgroup storage types In order to introduce per-cpu cgroup storage, let's generalize bpf cgroup core to support multiple cgroup storage types. Potentially, per-node cgroup storage can be added later. This commit is mostly a formal change that replaces cgroup_storage pointer with a array of cgroup_storage pointers. It doesn't actually introduce a new storage type, it will be done later. Each bpf program is now able to have one cgroup storage of each type. Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-09-28 22:45:36 +08:00
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype)
bpf_cgroup_storage_free(storage[stype]);
bpf/test_run: support cgroup local storage Allocate a temporary cgroup storage to use for bpf program test runs. Because the test program is not actually attached to a cgroup, the storage is allocated manually just for the execution of the bpf program. If the program is executed multiple times, the storage is not zeroed on each run, emulating multiple runs of the program, attached to a real cgroup. Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-08-03 05:27:27 +08:00
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. See recent discussion: http://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAH3MdRWHr4N8jei8jxDppXjmw-Nw=puNDLbu1dQOFQHxfU2onA@mail.gmail.com I'll follow up with the same fix bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector in bpf-next. Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-13 07:42:38 +08:00
return ret;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
}
bpf: Do not dereference user pointer in bpf_test_finish(). Instead, pass the kattr in which has a kernel side copy of this data structure from userspace already. Fix based upon a suggestion from Alexei Starovoitov. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-05-02 23:36:33 +08:00
static int bpf_test_finish(const union bpf_attr *kattr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr, const void *data,
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
u32 size, u32 retval, u32 duration)
{
bpf: Do not dereference user pointer in bpf_test_finish(). Instead, pass the kattr in which has a kernel side copy of this data structure from userspace already. Fix based upon a suggestion from Alexei Starovoitov. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-05-02 23:36:33 +08:00
void __user *data_out = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.data_out);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
int err = -EFAULT;
bpf: respect size hint to BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN if present Use data_size_out as a size hint when copying test output to user space. ENOSPC is returned if the output buffer is too small. Callers which so far did not set data_size_out are not affected. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-03 19:31:23 +08:00
u32 copy_size = size;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
bpf: respect size hint to BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN if present Use data_size_out as a size hint when copying test output to user space. ENOSPC is returned if the output buffer is too small. Callers which so far did not set data_size_out are not affected. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-03 19:31:23 +08:00
/* Clamp copy if the user has provided a size hint, but copy the full
* buffer if not to retain old behaviour.
*/
if (kattr->test.data_size_out &&
copy_size > kattr->test.data_size_out) {
copy_size = kattr->test.data_size_out;
err = -ENOSPC;
}
if (data_out && copy_to_user(data_out, data, copy_size))
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
goto out;
if (copy_to_user(&uattr->test.data_size_out, &size, sizeof(size)))
goto out;
if (copy_to_user(&uattr->test.retval, &retval, sizeof(retval)))
goto out;
if (copy_to_user(&uattr->test.duration, &duration, sizeof(duration)))
goto out;
bpf: respect size hint to BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN if present Use data_size_out as a size hint when copying test output to user space. ENOSPC is returned if the output buffer is too small. Callers which so far did not set data_size_out are not affected. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-03 19:31:23 +08:00
if (err != -ENOSPC)
err = 0;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
out:
return err;
}
static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 size,
u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
{
void __user *data_in = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.data_in);
void *data;
if (size < ETH_HLEN || size > PAGE_SIZE - headroom - tailroom)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
data = kzalloc(size + headroom + tailroom, GFP_USER);
if (!data)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
if (copy_from_user(data + headroom, data_in, size)) {
kfree(data);
return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
}
return data;
}
int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
{
bool is_l2 = false, is_direct_pkt_access = false;
u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
u32 retval, duration;
bpf: fix panic due to oob in bpf_prog_test_run_skb sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below: [...] [ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425 [...] [ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13 [ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018 [ 248.865905] Call Trace: [ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185 [ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb [ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 [ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4 [ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270 [ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380 [ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190 [ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0 [ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0 [...] After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb() and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM. So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the __skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish() out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head() fails, bail out with error. Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to unexpected results. Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command") Reported-by: syzbot+709412e651e55ed96498@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+54f39d6ab58f39720a55@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-07-11 21:30:14 +08:00
int hh_len = ETH_HLEN;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
struct sk_buff *skb;
bpf: add tests for direct packet access from CGROUP_SKB Tests are added to make sure CGROUP_SKB cannot access: tc_classid, data_meta, flow_keys and can read and write: mark, prority, and cb[0-4] and can read other fields. To make selftest with skb->sk work, a dummy sk is added in bpf_prog_test_run_skb(). Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-10-20 00:57:58 +08:00
struct sock *sk;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
void *data;
int ret;
bpf: Align packet data properly in program testing framework. Make sure we apply NET_IP_ALIGN when reserving headroom for SKB and XDP test runs, just like a real driver would. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-05-02 23:36:45 +08:00
data = bpf_test_init(kattr, size, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN,
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)));
if (IS_ERR(data))
return PTR_ERR(data);
switch (prog->type) {
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT:
is_l2 = true;
/* fall through */
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT:
is_direct_pkt_access = true;
break;
default:
break;
}
bpf: add tests for direct packet access from CGROUP_SKB Tests are added to make sure CGROUP_SKB cannot access: tc_classid, data_meta, flow_keys and can read and write: mark, prority, and cb[0-4] and can read other fields. To make selftest with skb->sk work, a dummy sk is added in bpf_prog_test_run_skb(). Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-10-20 00:57:58 +08:00
sk = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sock), GFP_USER);
if (!sk) {
kfree(data);
return -ENOMEM;
}
sock_net_set(sk, current->nsproxy->net_ns);
sock_init_data(NULL, sk);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
skb = build_skb(data, 0);
if (!skb) {
kfree(data);
bpf: add tests for direct packet access from CGROUP_SKB Tests are added to make sure CGROUP_SKB cannot access: tc_classid, data_meta, flow_keys and can read and write: mark, prority, and cb[0-4] and can read other fields. To make selftest with skb->sk work, a dummy sk is added in bpf_prog_test_run_skb(). Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-10-20 00:57:58 +08:00
kfree(sk);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
return -ENOMEM;
}
bpf: add tests for direct packet access from CGROUP_SKB Tests are added to make sure CGROUP_SKB cannot access: tc_classid, data_meta, flow_keys and can read and write: mark, prority, and cb[0-4] and can read other fields. To make selftest with skb->sk work, a dummy sk is added in bpf_prog_test_run_skb(). Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-10-20 00:57:58 +08:00
skb->sk = sk;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
bpf: Align packet data properly in program testing framework. Make sure we apply NET_IP_ALIGN when reserving headroom for SKB and XDP test runs, just like a real driver would. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-05-02 23:36:45 +08:00
skb_reserve(skb, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
__skb_put(skb, size);
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, current->nsproxy->net_ns->loopback_dev);
skb_reset_network_header(skb);
if (is_l2)
bpf: fix panic due to oob in bpf_prog_test_run_skb sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below: [...] [ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425 [...] [ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13 [ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018 [ 248.865905] Call Trace: [ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185 [ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb [ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 [ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4 [ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270 [ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380 [ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190 [ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0 [ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0 [...] After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb() and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM. So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the __skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish() out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head() fails, bail out with error. Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to unexpected results. Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command") Reported-by: syzbot+709412e651e55ed96498@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+54f39d6ab58f39720a55@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-07-11 21:30:14 +08:00
__skb_push(skb, hh_len);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
if (is_direct_pkt_access)
bpf: rename bpf_compute_data_end into bpf_compute_data_pointers Just do the rename into bpf_compute_data_pointers() as we'll add one more pointer here to recompute. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-09-25 08:25:50 +08:00
bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
bpf: refactor bpf_test_run() to separate own failures and test program result After commit f42ee093be29 ("bpf/test_run: support cgroup local storage") the bpf_test_run() function may fail with -ENOMEM, if it's not possible to allocate memory for a cgroup local storage. This error shouldn't be mixed with the return value of the testing program. Let's add an additional argument with a pointer where to store the testing program's result; and make bpf_test_run() return either 0 or -ENOMEM. Fixes: f42ee093be29 ("bpf/test_run: support cgroup local storage") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-02 02:39:44 +08:00
ret = bpf_test_run(prog, skb, repeat, &retval, &duration);
if (ret) {
kfree_skb(skb);
kfree(sk);
return ret;
}
bpf: fix panic due to oob in bpf_prog_test_run_skb sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below: [...] [ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425 [...] [ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13 [ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018 [ 248.865905] Call Trace: [ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185 [ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb [ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 [ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4 [ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270 [ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380 [ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190 [ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0 [ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0 [...] After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb() and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM. So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the __skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish() out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head() fails, bail out with error. Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to unexpected results. Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command") Reported-by: syzbot+709412e651e55ed96498@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+54f39d6ab58f39720a55@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-07-11 21:30:14 +08:00
if (!is_l2) {
if (skb_headroom(skb) < hh_len) {
int nhead = HH_DATA_ALIGN(hh_len - skb_headroom(skb));
if (pskb_expand_head(skb, nhead, 0, GFP_USER)) {
kfree_skb(skb);
bpf: add tests for direct packet access from CGROUP_SKB Tests are added to make sure CGROUP_SKB cannot access: tc_classid, data_meta, flow_keys and can read and write: mark, prority, and cb[0-4] and can read other fields. To make selftest with skb->sk work, a dummy sk is added in bpf_prog_test_run_skb(). Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-10-20 00:57:58 +08:00
kfree(sk);
bpf: fix panic due to oob in bpf_prog_test_run_skb sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below: [...] [ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425 [...] [ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13 [ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018 [ 248.865905] Call Trace: [ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185 [ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb [ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 [ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4 [ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270 [ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380 [ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190 [ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0 [ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0 [...] After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb() and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM. So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the __skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish() out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head() fails, bail out with error. Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to unexpected results. Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command") Reported-by: syzbot+709412e651e55ed96498@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+54f39d6ab58f39720a55@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-07-11 21:30:14 +08:00
return -ENOMEM;
}
}
memset(__skb_push(skb, hh_len), 0, hh_len);
}
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
size = skb->len;
/* bpf program can never convert linear skb to non-linear */
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_is_nonlinear(skb)))
size = skb_headlen(skb);
bpf: Do not dereference user pointer in bpf_test_finish(). Instead, pass the kattr in which has a kernel side copy of this data structure from userspace already. Fix based upon a suggestion from Alexei Starovoitov. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-05-02 23:36:33 +08:00
ret = bpf_test_finish(kattr, uattr, skb->data, size, retval, duration);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
kfree_skb(skb);
bpf: add tests for direct packet access from CGROUP_SKB Tests are added to make sure CGROUP_SKB cannot access: tc_classid, data_meta, flow_keys and can read and write: mark, prority, and cb[0-4] and can read other fields. To make selftest with skb->sk work, a dummy sk is added in bpf_prog_test_run_skb(). Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-10-20 00:57:58 +08:00
kfree(sk);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
return ret;
}
int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
{
u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
bpf: fix null pointer deref in bpf_prog_test_run_xdp syzkaller was able to generate the following XDP program ... (18) r0 = 0x0 (61) r5 = *(u32 *)(r1 +12) (04) (u32) r0 += (u32) 0 (95) exit ... and trigger a NULL pointer dereference in ___bpf_prog_run() via bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() where this was attempted to run. Reason is that recent xdp_rxq_info addition to XDP programs updated all drivers, but not bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(), where xdp_buff is set up. Thus when context rewriter does the deref on the netdev it's NULL at runtime. Fix it by using xdp_rxq from loopback dev. __netif_get_rx_queue() helper can also be reused in various other locations later on. Fixes: 02dd3291b2f0 ("bpf: finally expose xdp_rxq_info to XDP bpf-programs") Reported-by: syzbot+1eb094057b338eb1fc00@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-01-31 19:58:56 +08:00
struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
struct xdp_buff xdp = {};
u32 retval, duration;
void *data;
int ret;
bpf: Align packet data properly in program testing framework. Make sure we apply NET_IP_ALIGN when reserving headroom for SKB and XDP test runs, just like a real driver would. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-05-02 23:36:45 +08:00
data = bpf_test_init(kattr, size, XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM + NET_IP_ALIGN, 0);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
if (IS_ERR(data))
return PTR_ERR(data);
xdp.data_hard_start = data;
bpf: Align packet data properly in program testing framework. Make sure we apply NET_IP_ALIGN when reserving headroom for SKB and XDP test runs, just like a real driver would. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-05-02 23:36:45 +08:00
xdp.data = data + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM + NET_IP_ALIGN;
bpf: add meta pointer for direct access This work enables generic transfer of metadata from XDP into skb. The basic idea is that we can make use of the fact that the resulting skb must be linear and already comes with a larger headroom for supporting bpf_xdp_adjust_head(), which mangles xdp->data. Here, we base our work on a similar principle and introduce a small helper bpf_xdp_adjust_meta() for adjusting a new pointer called xdp->data_meta. Thus, the packet has a flexible and programmable room for meta data, followed by the actual packet data. struct xdp_buff is therefore laid out that we first point to data_hard_start, then data_meta directly prepended to data followed by data_end marking the end of packet. bpf_xdp_adjust_head() takes into account whether we have meta data already prepended and if so, memmove()s this along with the given offset provided there's enough room. xdp->data_meta is optional and programs are not required to use it. The rationale is that when we process the packet in XDP (e.g. as DoS filter), we can push further meta data along with it for the XDP_PASS case, and give the guarantee that a clsact ingress BPF program on the same device can pick this up for further post-processing. Since we work with skb there, we can also set skb->mark, skb->priority or other skb meta data out of BPF, thus having this scratch space generic and programmable allows for more flexibility than defining a direct 1:1 transfer of potentially new XDP members into skb (it's also more efficient as we don't need to initialize/handle each of such new members). The facility also works together with GRO aggregation. The scratch space at the head of the packet can be multiple of 4 byte up to 32 byte large. Drivers not yet supporting xdp->data_meta can simply be set up with xdp->data_meta as xdp->data + 1 as bpf_xdp_adjust_meta() will detect this and bail out, such that the subsequent match against xdp->data for later access is guaranteed to fail. The verifier treats xdp->data_meta/xdp->data the same way as we treat xdp->data/xdp->data_end pointer comparisons. The requirement for doing the compare against xdp->data is that it hasn't been modified from it's original address we got from ctx access. It may have a range marking already from prior successful xdp->data/xdp->data_end pointer comparisons though. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-09-25 08:25:51 +08:00
xdp.data_meta = xdp.data;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
xdp.data_end = xdp.data + size;
bpf: fix null pointer deref in bpf_prog_test_run_xdp syzkaller was able to generate the following XDP program ... (18) r0 = 0x0 (61) r5 = *(u32 *)(r1 +12) (04) (u32) r0 += (u32) 0 (95) exit ... and trigger a NULL pointer dereference in ___bpf_prog_run() via bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() where this was attempted to run. Reason is that recent xdp_rxq_info addition to XDP programs updated all drivers, but not bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(), where xdp_buff is set up. Thus when context rewriter does the deref on the netdev it's NULL at runtime. Fix it by using xdp_rxq from loopback dev. __netif_get_rx_queue() helper can also be reused in various other locations later on. Fixes: 02dd3291b2f0 ("bpf: finally expose xdp_rxq_info to XDP bpf-programs") Reported-by: syzbot+1eb094057b338eb1fc00@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-01-31 19:58:56 +08:00
rxqueue = __netif_get_rx_queue(current->nsproxy->net_ns->loopback_dev, 0);
xdp.rxq = &rxqueue->xdp_rxq;
bpf: refactor bpf_test_run() to separate own failures and test program result After commit f42ee093be29 ("bpf/test_run: support cgroup local storage") the bpf_test_run() function may fail with -ENOMEM, if it's not possible to allocate memory for a cgroup local storage. This error shouldn't be mixed with the return value of the testing program. Let's add an additional argument with a pointer where to store the testing program's result; and make bpf_test_run() return either 0 or -ENOMEM. Fixes: f42ee093be29 ("bpf/test_run: support cgroup local storage") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-02 02:39:44 +08:00
ret = bpf_test_run(prog, &xdp, repeat, &retval, &duration);
if (ret)
goto out;
bpf: making bpf_prog_test run aware of possible data_end ptr change after introduction of bpf_xdp_adjust_tail helper packet length could be changed not only if xdp->data pointer has been changed but xdp->data_end as well. making bpf_prog_test_run aware of this possibility Signed-off-by: Nikita V. Shirokov <tehnerd@tehnerd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-18 12:42:21 +08:00
if (xdp.data != data + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM + NET_IP_ALIGN ||
xdp.data_end != xdp.data + size)
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
size = xdp.data_end - xdp.data;
bpf: Do not dereference user pointer in bpf_test_finish(). Instead, pass the kattr in which has a kernel side copy of this data structure from userspace already. Fix based upon a suggestion from Alexei Starovoitov. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-05-02 23:36:33 +08:00
ret = bpf_test_finish(kattr, uattr, xdp.data, size, retval, duration);
bpf: refactor bpf_test_run() to separate own failures and test program result After commit f42ee093be29 ("bpf/test_run: support cgroup local storage") the bpf_test_run() function may fail with -ENOMEM, if it's not possible to allocate memory for a cgroup local storage. This error shouldn't be mixed with the return value of the testing program. Let's add an additional argument with a pointer where to store the testing program's result; and make bpf_test_run() return either 0 or -ENOMEM. Fixes: f42ee093be29 ("bpf/test_run: support cgroup local storage") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-02 02:39:44 +08:00
out:
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
kfree(data);
return ret;
}
bpf: add BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN support for flow dissector The input is packet data, the output is struct bpf_flow_key. This should make it easy to test flow dissector programs without elaborate setup. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-29 00:53:54 +08:00
int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct bpf_prog *prog,
const union bpf_attr *kattr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
{
u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
struct bpf_flow_keys flow_keys;
u64 time_start, time_spent = 0;
struct bpf_skb_data_end *cb;
u32 retval, duration;
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct sock *sk;
void *data;
int ret;
u32 i;
if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR)
return -EINVAL;
data = bpf_test_init(kattr, size, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN,
SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)));
if (IS_ERR(data))
return PTR_ERR(data);
sk = kzalloc(sizeof(*sk), GFP_USER);
if (!sk) {
kfree(data);
return -ENOMEM;
}
sock_net_set(sk, current->nsproxy->net_ns);
sock_init_data(NULL, sk);
skb = build_skb(data, 0);
if (!skb) {
kfree(data);
kfree(sk);
return -ENOMEM;
}
skb->sk = sk;
skb_reserve(skb, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN);
__skb_put(skb, size);
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb,
current->nsproxy->net_ns->loopback_dev);
skb_reset_network_header(skb);
cb = (struct bpf_skb_data_end *)skb->cb;
cb->qdisc_cb.flow_keys = &flow_keys;
if (!repeat)
repeat = 1;
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for flow dissector Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. This is a follow up for a recently fixed issue in bpf_test_run, see commit df1a2cb7c74b ("bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN"). Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-20 02:54:17 +08:00
rcu_read_lock();
preempt_disable();
bpf: add BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN support for flow dissector The input is packet data, the output is struct bpf_flow_key. This should make it easy to test flow dissector programs without elaborate setup. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-29 00:53:54 +08:00
time_start = ktime_get_ns();
for (i = 0; i < repeat; i++) {
retval = __skb_flow_bpf_dissect(prog, skb,
&flow_keys_dissector,
&flow_keys);
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for flow dissector Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. This is a follow up for a recently fixed issue in bpf_test_run, see commit df1a2cb7c74b ("bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN"). Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-20 02:54:17 +08:00
if (signal_pending(current)) {
preempt_enable();
rcu_read_unlock();
ret = -EINTR;
goto out;
}
bpf: add BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN support for flow dissector The input is packet data, the output is struct bpf_flow_key. This should make it easy to test flow dissector programs without elaborate setup. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-29 00:53:54 +08:00
if (need_resched()) {
time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start;
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for flow dissector Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. This is a follow up for a recently fixed issue in bpf_test_run, see commit df1a2cb7c74b ("bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN"). Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-20 02:54:17 +08:00
preempt_enable();
rcu_read_unlock();
bpf: add BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN support for flow dissector The input is packet data, the output is struct bpf_flow_key. This should make it easy to test flow dissector programs without elaborate setup. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-29 00:53:54 +08:00
cond_resched();
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for flow dissector Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. This is a follow up for a recently fixed issue in bpf_test_run, see commit df1a2cb7c74b ("bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN"). Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-20 02:54:17 +08:00
rcu_read_lock();
preempt_disable();
bpf: add BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN support for flow dissector The input is packet data, the output is struct bpf_flow_key. This should make it easy to test flow dissector programs without elaborate setup. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-29 00:53:54 +08:00
time_start = ktime_get_ns();
}
}
time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start;
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for flow dissector Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. This is a follow up for a recently fixed issue in bpf_test_run, see commit df1a2cb7c74b ("bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN"). Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-20 02:54:17 +08:00
preempt_enable();
rcu_read_unlock();
bpf: add BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN support for flow dissector The input is packet data, the output is struct bpf_flow_key. This should make it easy to test flow dissector programs without elaborate setup. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-29 00:53:54 +08:00
do_div(time_spent, repeat);
duration = time_spent > U32_MAX ? U32_MAX : (u32)time_spent;
ret = bpf_test_finish(kattr, uattr, &flow_keys, sizeof(flow_keys),
retval, duration);
bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for flow dissector Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each iteration) now handles resched if it's needed. Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case we can properly see whether resched is needed. Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal interrupt. This is a follow up for a recently fixed issue in bpf_test_run, see commit df1a2cb7c74b ("bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN"). Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-20 02:54:17 +08:00
out:
bpf: add BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN support for flow dissector The input is packet data, the output is struct bpf_flow_key. This should make it easy to test flow dissector programs without elaborate setup. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-29 00:53:54 +08:00
kfree_skb(skb);
kfree(sk);
return ret;
}