linux/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c

138 lines
3.7 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* ACPI support for platform bus type.
*
* Copyright (C) 2012, Intel Corporation
* Authors: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
* Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*/
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include "internal.h"
ACPI_MODULE_NAME("platform");
/*
* The following ACPI IDs are known to be suitable for representing as
* platform devices.
*/
static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_platform_device_ids[] = {
{ "PNP0D40" },
{ "ACPI0003" },
{ "VPC2004" },
{ "BCM4752" },
/* Intel Smart Sound Technology */
{ "INT33C8" },
{ "80860F28" },
{ }
};
/**
* acpi_create_platform_device - Create platform device for ACPI device node
* @adev: ACPI device node to create a platform device for.
* @id: ACPI device ID used to match @adev.
*
* Check if the given @adev can be represented as a platform device and, if
* that's the case, create and register a platform device, populate its common
* resources and returns a pointer to it. Otherwise, return %NULL.
*
* Name of the platform device will be the same as @adev's.
*/
ACPI / scan: Add special handler for Intel Lynxpoint LPSS devices Devices on the Intel Lynxpoint Low Power Subsystem (LPSS) have some common features that aren't shared with any other platform devices, including the clock and LTR (Latency Tolerance Reporting) registers. It is better to handle those features in common code than to bother device drivers with doing that (I/O functionality-wise the LPSS devices are generally compatible with other devices that don't have those special registers and may be handled by the same drivers). The clock registers of the LPSS devices are now taken care of by the special clk-x86-lpss driver, but the MMIO mappings used for accessing those registers can also be used for accessing the LTR registers on those devices (LTR support for the Lynxpoint LPSS is going to be added by a subsequent patch). Thus it is convenient to add a special ACPI scan handler for the Lynxpoint LPSS devices that will create the MMIO mappings for accessing the clock (and LTR in the future) registers and will register the LPSS devices' clocks, so the clk-x86-lpss driver will only need to take care of the main Lynxpoint LPSS clock. Introduce a special ACPI scan handler for Intel Lynxpoint LPSS devices as described above. This also reduces overhead related to browsing the ACPI namespace in search of the LPSS devices before the registration of their clocks, removes some LPSS-specific (and somewhat ugly) code from acpi_platform.c and shrinks the overall code size slightly. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
2013-03-07 06:46:20 +08:00
int acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
const struct acpi_device_id *id)
{
struct platform_device *pdev = NULL;
struct acpi_device *acpi_parent;
ACPI / platform: Initialize ACPI handles of platform devices in advance The current platform device creation and registration code in acpi_create_platform_device() is quite convoluted. This function takes an ACPI device node as an argument and eventually calls platform_device_register_resndata() to create and register a platform device object on the basis of the information contained in that code. However, it doesn't associate the new platform device with the ACPI node directly, but instead it relies on acpi_platform_notify(), called from within device_add(), to find that ACPI node again with the help of acpi_platform_find_device() and acpi_platform_match() and then attach the new platform device to it. This causes an additional ACPI namespace walk to happen and is clearly suboptimal. Use the observation that it is now possible to initialize the ACPI handle of a device before calling device_add() for it to make this code more straightforward. Namely, add a new field to struct platform_device_info allowing us to pass the ACPI handle of interest to platform_device_register_full(), which will then use it to initialize the new device's ACPI handle before registering it. This will cause acpi_platform_notify() to use the ACPI handle from the device structure directly instead of using the .find_device() routine provided by the device's bus type. In consequence, acpi_platform_bus, acpi_platform_find_device(), and acpi_platform_match() are not necessary any more, so remove them. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-11-21 07:21:59 +08:00
struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-15 07:30:21 +08:00
struct resource_list_entry *rentry;
struct list_head resource_list;
struct resource *resources = NULL;
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-15 07:30:21 +08:00
int count;
/* If the ACPI node already has a physical device attached, skip it. */
if (adev->physical_node_count)
return 0;
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-15 07:30:21 +08:00
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
count = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list, NULL, NULL);
if (count < 0) {
return 0;
} else if (count > 0) {
resources = kmalloc(count * sizeof(struct resource),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!resources) {
dev_err(&adev->dev, "No memory for resources\n");
acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
return -ENOMEM;
}
count = 0;
list_for_each_entry(rentry, &resource_list, node)
resources[count++] = rentry->res;
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-15 07:30:21 +08:00
acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
}
ACPI / platform: Initialize ACPI handles of platform devices in advance The current platform device creation and registration code in acpi_create_platform_device() is quite convoluted. This function takes an ACPI device node as an argument and eventually calls platform_device_register_resndata() to create and register a platform device object on the basis of the information contained in that code. However, it doesn't associate the new platform device with the ACPI node directly, but instead it relies on acpi_platform_notify(), called from within device_add(), to find that ACPI node again with the help of acpi_platform_find_device() and acpi_platform_match() and then attach the new platform device to it. This causes an additional ACPI namespace walk to happen and is clearly suboptimal. Use the observation that it is now possible to initialize the ACPI handle of a device before calling device_add() for it to make this code more straightforward. Namely, add a new field to struct platform_device_info allowing us to pass the ACPI handle of interest to platform_device_register_full(), which will then use it to initialize the new device's ACPI handle before registering it. This will cause acpi_platform_notify() to use the ACPI handle from the device structure directly instead of using the .find_device() routine provided by the device's bus type. In consequence, acpi_platform_bus, acpi_platform_find_device(), and acpi_platform_match() are not necessary any more, so remove them. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-11-21 07:21:59 +08:00
memset(&pdevinfo, 0, sizeof(pdevinfo));
/*
* If the ACPI node has a parent and that parent has a physical device
* attached to it, that physical device should be the parent of the
* platform device we are about to create.
*/
ACPI / platform: Initialize ACPI handles of platform devices in advance The current platform device creation and registration code in acpi_create_platform_device() is quite convoluted. This function takes an ACPI device node as an argument and eventually calls platform_device_register_resndata() to create and register a platform device object on the basis of the information contained in that code. However, it doesn't associate the new platform device with the ACPI node directly, but instead it relies on acpi_platform_notify(), called from within device_add(), to find that ACPI node again with the help of acpi_platform_find_device() and acpi_platform_match() and then attach the new platform device to it. This causes an additional ACPI namespace walk to happen and is clearly suboptimal. Use the observation that it is now possible to initialize the ACPI handle of a device before calling device_add() for it to make this code more straightforward. Namely, add a new field to struct platform_device_info allowing us to pass the ACPI handle of interest to platform_device_register_full(), which will then use it to initialize the new device's ACPI handle before registering it. This will cause acpi_platform_notify() to use the ACPI handle from the device structure directly instead of using the .find_device() routine provided by the device's bus type. In consequence, acpi_platform_bus, acpi_platform_find_device(), and acpi_platform_match() are not necessary any more, so remove them. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-11-21 07:21:59 +08:00
pdevinfo.parent = NULL;
acpi_parent = adev->parent;
if (acpi_parent) {
struct acpi_device_physical_node *entry;
struct list_head *list;
mutex_lock(&acpi_parent->physical_node_lock);
list = &acpi_parent->physical_node_list;
if (!list_empty(list)) {
entry = list_first_entry(list,
struct acpi_device_physical_node,
node);
ACPI / platform: Initialize ACPI handles of platform devices in advance The current platform device creation and registration code in acpi_create_platform_device() is quite convoluted. This function takes an ACPI device node as an argument and eventually calls platform_device_register_resndata() to create and register a platform device object on the basis of the information contained in that code. However, it doesn't associate the new platform device with the ACPI node directly, but instead it relies on acpi_platform_notify(), called from within device_add(), to find that ACPI node again with the help of acpi_platform_find_device() and acpi_platform_match() and then attach the new platform device to it. This causes an additional ACPI namespace walk to happen and is clearly suboptimal. Use the observation that it is now possible to initialize the ACPI handle of a device before calling device_add() for it to make this code more straightforward. Namely, add a new field to struct platform_device_info allowing us to pass the ACPI handle of interest to platform_device_register_full(), which will then use it to initialize the new device's ACPI handle before registering it. This will cause acpi_platform_notify() to use the ACPI handle from the device structure directly instead of using the .find_device() routine provided by the device's bus type. In consequence, acpi_platform_bus, acpi_platform_find_device(), and acpi_platform_match() are not necessary any more, so remove them. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-11-21 07:21:59 +08:00
pdevinfo.parent = entry->dev;
}
mutex_unlock(&acpi_parent->physical_node_lock);
}
ACPI / platform: Initialize ACPI handles of platform devices in advance The current platform device creation and registration code in acpi_create_platform_device() is quite convoluted. This function takes an ACPI device node as an argument and eventually calls platform_device_register_resndata() to create and register a platform device object on the basis of the information contained in that code. However, it doesn't associate the new platform device with the ACPI node directly, but instead it relies on acpi_platform_notify(), called from within device_add(), to find that ACPI node again with the help of acpi_platform_find_device() and acpi_platform_match() and then attach the new platform device to it. This causes an additional ACPI namespace walk to happen and is clearly suboptimal. Use the observation that it is now possible to initialize the ACPI handle of a device before calling device_add() for it to make this code more straightforward. Namely, add a new field to struct platform_device_info allowing us to pass the ACPI handle of interest to platform_device_register_full(), which will then use it to initialize the new device's ACPI handle before registering it. This will cause acpi_platform_notify() to use the ACPI handle from the device structure directly instead of using the .find_device() routine provided by the device's bus type. In consequence, acpi_platform_bus, acpi_platform_find_device(), and acpi_platform_match() are not necessary any more, so remove them. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-11-21 07:21:59 +08:00
pdevinfo.name = dev_name(&adev->dev);
pdevinfo.id = -1;
pdevinfo.res = resources;
pdevinfo.num_res = count;
ACPI / driver core: Store an ACPI device pointer in struct acpi_dev_node Modify struct acpi_dev_node to contain a pointer to struct acpi_device associated with the given device object (that is, its ACPI companion device) instead of an ACPI handle corresponding to it. Introduce two new macros for manipulating that pointer in a CONFIG_ACPI-safe way, ACPI_COMPANION() and ACPI_COMPANION_SET(), and rework the ACPI_HANDLE() macro to take the above changes into account. Drop the ACPI_HANDLE_SET() macro entirely and rework its users to use ACPI_COMPANION_SET() instead. For some of them who used to pass the result of acpi_get_child() directly to ACPI_HANDLE_SET() introduce a helper routine acpi_preset_companion() doing an equivalent thing. The main motivation for doing this is that there are things represented by struct acpi_device objects that don't have valid ACPI handles (so called fixed ACPI hardware features, such as power and sleep buttons) and we would like to create platform device objects for them and "glue" them to their ACPI companions in the usual way (which currently is impossible due to the lack of valid ACPI handles). However, there are more reasons why it may be useful. First, struct acpi_device pointers allow of much better type checking than void pointers which are ACPI handles, so it should be more difficult to write buggy code using modified struct acpi_dev_node and the new macros. Second, the change should help to reduce (over time) the number of places in which the result of ACPI_HANDLE() is passed to acpi_bus_get_device() in order to obtain a pointer to the struct acpi_device associated with the given "physical" device, because now that pointer is returned by ACPI_COMPANION() directly. Finally, the change should make it easier to write generic code that will build both for CONFIG_ACPI set and unset without adding explicit compiler directives to it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> # on Haswell Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA and SDIO part
2013-11-12 05:41:56 +08:00
pdevinfo.acpi_node.companion = adev;
ACPI / platform: Initialize ACPI handles of platform devices in advance The current platform device creation and registration code in acpi_create_platform_device() is quite convoluted. This function takes an ACPI device node as an argument and eventually calls platform_device_register_resndata() to create and register a platform device object on the basis of the information contained in that code. However, it doesn't associate the new platform device with the ACPI node directly, but instead it relies on acpi_platform_notify(), called from within device_add(), to find that ACPI node again with the help of acpi_platform_find_device() and acpi_platform_match() and then attach the new platform device to it. This causes an additional ACPI namespace walk to happen and is clearly suboptimal. Use the observation that it is now possible to initialize the ACPI handle of a device before calling device_add() for it to make this code more straightforward. Namely, add a new field to struct platform_device_info allowing us to pass the ACPI handle of interest to platform_device_register_full(), which will then use it to initialize the new device's ACPI handle before registering it. This will cause acpi_platform_notify() to use the ACPI handle from the device structure directly instead of using the .find_device() routine provided by the device's bus type. In consequence, acpi_platform_bus, acpi_platform_find_device(), and acpi_platform_match() are not necessary any more, so remove them. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-11-21 07:21:59 +08:00
pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
dev_err(&adev->dev, "platform device creation failed: %ld\n",
PTR_ERR(pdev));
pdev = NULL;
} else {
dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "created platform device %s\n",
dev_name(&pdev->dev));
}
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-15 07:30:21 +08:00
kfree(resources);
return 1;
}
static struct acpi_scan_handler platform_handler = {
.ids = acpi_platform_device_ids,
.attach = acpi_create_platform_device,
};
void __init acpi_platform_init(void)
{
acpi_scan_add_handler(&platform_handler);
}