License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 22:07:57 +08:00
|
|
|
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
|
2017-05-02 03:43:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef __BPF_ENDIAN__
|
|
|
|
|
#define __BPF_ENDIAN__
|
|
|
|
|
|
bpf, tests: fix endianness selection
I noticed that test_l4lb was failing in selftests:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 77 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 44 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2933 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1500 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 377 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 544 nsec
test_l4lb:FAIL:stats 6297600000 200000
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 1 FAILED
Tracking down the issue actually revealed that endianness selection
in bpf_endian.h is broken when compiled with clang with bpf target.
test_pkt_access.c, test_l4lb.c is compiled with __BYTE_ORDER as
__BIG_ENDIAN, test_xdp.c as __LITTLE_ENDIAN! test_l4lb noticeably
fails, because the test accounts bytes via bpf_ntohs(ip6h->payload_len)
and bpf_ntohs(iph->tot_len), and compares them against a defined
value and given a wrong endianness, the test outcome is different,
of course.
Turns out that there are actually two bugs: i) when we do __BYTE_ORDER
comparison with __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN, then depending on the
include order we see different outcomes. Reason is that __BYTE_ORDER
is undefined due to missing endian.h include. Before we include the
asm/byteorder.h (e.g. through linux/in.h), then __BYTE_ORDER equals
__LITTLE_ENDIAN since both are undefined, after the include which
correctly pulls in linux/byteorder/little_endian.h, __LITTLE_ENDIAN
is defined, but given __BYTE_ORDER is still undefined, we match on
__BYTE_ORDER equals to __BIG_ENDIAN since __BIG_ENDIAN is also
undefined at that point, sigh. ii) But even that would be wrong,
since when compiling the test cases with clang, one can select between
bpfeb and bpfel targets for cross compilation. Hence, we can also not
rely on what the system's endian.h provides, but we need to look at
the compiler's defined endianness. The compiler defines __BYTE_ORDER__,
and we can match __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ and __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__,
which also reflects targets bpf (native), bpfel, bpfeb correctly,
thus really only rely on that. After patch:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 74 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 42 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2340 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1461 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 400 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 530 nsec
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 0 FAILED
Fixes: 43bcf707ccdc ("bpf: fix _htons occurences in test_progs")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-09 01:06:25 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/swab.h>
|
2017-05-02 03:43:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
bpf, tests: fix endianness selection
I noticed that test_l4lb was failing in selftests:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 77 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 44 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2933 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1500 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 377 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 544 nsec
test_l4lb:FAIL:stats 6297600000 200000
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 1 FAILED
Tracking down the issue actually revealed that endianness selection
in bpf_endian.h is broken when compiled with clang with bpf target.
test_pkt_access.c, test_l4lb.c is compiled with __BYTE_ORDER as
__BIG_ENDIAN, test_xdp.c as __LITTLE_ENDIAN! test_l4lb noticeably
fails, because the test accounts bytes via bpf_ntohs(ip6h->payload_len)
and bpf_ntohs(iph->tot_len), and compares them against a defined
value and given a wrong endianness, the test outcome is different,
of course.
Turns out that there are actually two bugs: i) when we do __BYTE_ORDER
comparison with __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN, then depending on the
include order we see different outcomes. Reason is that __BYTE_ORDER
is undefined due to missing endian.h include. Before we include the
asm/byteorder.h (e.g. through linux/in.h), then __BYTE_ORDER equals
__LITTLE_ENDIAN since both are undefined, after the include which
correctly pulls in linux/byteorder/little_endian.h, __LITTLE_ENDIAN
is defined, but given __BYTE_ORDER is still undefined, we match on
__BYTE_ORDER equals to __BIG_ENDIAN since __BIG_ENDIAN is also
undefined at that point, sigh. ii) But even that would be wrong,
since when compiling the test cases with clang, one can select between
bpfeb and bpfel targets for cross compilation. Hence, we can also not
rely on what the system's endian.h provides, but we need to look at
the compiler's defined endianness. The compiler defines __BYTE_ORDER__,
and we can match __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ and __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__,
which also reflects targets bpf (native), bpfel, bpfeb correctly,
thus really only rely on that. After patch:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 74 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 42 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2340 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1461 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 400 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 530 nsec
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 0 FAILED
Fixes: 43bcf707ccdc ("bpf: fix _htons occurences in test_progs")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-09 01:06:25 +08:00
|
|
|
/* LLVM's BPF target selects the endianness of the CPU
|
|
|
|
|
* it compiles on, or the user specifies (bpfel/bpfeb),
|
|
|
|
|
* respectively. The used __BYTE_ORDER__ is defined by
|
|
|
|
|
* the compiler, we cannot rely on __BYTE_ORDER from
|
|
|
|
|
* libc headers, since it doesn't reflect the actual
|
|
|
|
|
* requested byte order.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Note, LLVM's BPF target has different __builtin_bswapX()
|
|
|
|
|
* semantics. It does map to BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_TO_BE
|
|
|
|
|
* in bpfel and bpfeb case, which means below, that we map
|
|
|
|
|
* to cpu_to_be16(). We could use it unconditionally in BPF
|
|
|
|
|
* case, but better not rely on it, so that this header here
|
|
|
|
|
* can be used from application and BPF program side, which
|
|
|
|
|
* use different targets.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_ntohs(x) __builtin_bswap16(x)
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_htons(x) __builtin_bswap16(x)
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_constant_ntohs(x) ___constant_swab16(x)
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_constant_htons(x) ___constant_swab16(x)
|
2017-07-11 05:04:28 +08:00
|
|
|
# define __bpf_ntohl(x) __builtin_bswap32(x)
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_htonl(x) __builtin_bswap32(x)
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_constant_ntohl(x) ___constant_swab32(x)
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_constant_htonl(x) ___constant_swab32(x)
|
bpf, tests: fix endianness selection
I noticed that test_l4lb was failing in selftests:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 77 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 44 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2933 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1500 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 377 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 544 nsec
test_l4lb:FAIL:stats 6297600000 200000
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 1 FAILED
Tracking down the issue actually revealed that endianness selection
in bpf_endian.h is broken when compiled with clang with bpf target.
test_pkt_access.c, test_l4lb.c is compiled with __BYTE_ORDER as
__BIG_ENDIAN, test_xdp.c as __LITTLE_ENDIAN! test_l4lb noticeably
fails, because the test accounts bytes via bpf_ntohs(ip6h->payload_len)
and bpf_ntohs(iph->tot_len), and compares them against a defined
value and given a wrong endianness, the test outcome is different,
of course.
Turns out that there are actually two bugs: i) when we do __BYTE_ORDER
comparison with __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN, then depending on the
include order we see different outcomes. Reason is that __BYTE_ORDER
is undefined due to missing endian.h include. Before we include the
asm/byteorder.h (e.g. through linux/in.h), then __BYTE_ORDER equals
__LITTLE_ENDIAN since both are undefined, after the include which
correctly pulls in linux/byteorder/little_endian.h, __LITTLE_ENDIAN
is defined, but given __BYTE_ORDER is still undefined, we match on
__BYTE_ORDER equals to __BIG_ENDIAN since __BIG_ENDIAN is also
undefined at that point, sigh. ii) But even that would be wrong,
since when compiling the test cases with clang, one can select between
bpfeb and bpfel targets for cross compilation. Hence, we can also not
rely on what the system's endian.h provides, but we need to look at
the compiler's defined endianness. The compiler defines __BYTE_ORDER__,
and we can match __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ and __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__,
which also reflects targets bpf (native), bpfel, bpfeb correctly,
thus really only rely on that. After patch:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 74 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 42 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2340 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1461 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 400 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 530 nsec
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 0 FAILED
Fixes: 43bcf707ccdc ("bpf: fix _htons occurences in test_progs")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-09 01:06:25 +08:00
|
|
|
#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_ntohs(x) (x)
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_htons(x) (x)
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_constant_ntohs(x) (x)
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_constant_htons(x) (x)
|
2017-07-11 05:04:28 +08:00
|
|
|
# define __bpf_ntohl(x) (x)
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_htonl(x) (x)
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_constant_ntohl(x) (x)
|
|
|
|
|
# define __bpf_constant_htonl(x) (x)
|
2017-05-02 03:43:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#else
|
bpf, tests: fix endianness selection
I noticed that test_l4lb was failing in selftests:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 77 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 44 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2933 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1500 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 377 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 544 nsec
test_l4lb:FAIL:stats 6297600000 200000
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 1 FAILED
Tracking down the issue actually revealed that endianness selection
in bpf_endian.h is broken when compiled with clang with bpf target.
test_pkt_access.c, test_l4lb.c is compiled with __BYTE_ORDER as
__BIG_ENDIAN, test_xdp.c as __LITTLE_ENDIAN! test_l4lb noticeably
fails, because the test accounts bytes via bpf_ntohs(ip6h->payload_len)
and bpf_ntohs(iph->tot_len), and compares them against a defined
value and given a wrong endianness, the test outcome is different,
of course.
Turns out that there are actually two bugs: i) when we do __BYTE_ORDER
comparison with __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN, then depending on the
include order we see different outcomes. Reason is that __BYTE_ORDER
is undefined due to missing endian.h include. Before we include the
asm/byteorder.h (e.g. through linux/in.h), then __BYTE_ORDER equals
__LITTLE_ENDIAN since both are undefined, after the include which
correctly pulls in linux/byteorder/little_endian.h, __LITTLE_ENDIAN
is defined, but given __BYTE_ORDER is still undefined, we match on
__BYTE_ORDER equals to __BIG_ENDIAN since __BIG_ENDIAN is also
undefined at that point, sigh. ii) But even that would be wrong,
since when compiling the test cases with clang, one can select between
bpfeb and bpfel targets for cross compilation. Hence, we can also not
rely on what the system's endian.h provides, but we need to look at
the compiler's defined endianness. The compiler defines __BYTE_ORDER__,
and we can match __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ and __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__,
which also reflects targets bpf (native), bpfel, bpfeb correctly,
thus really only rely on that. After patch:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 74 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 42 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2340 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1461 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 400 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 530 nsec
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 0 FAILED
Fixes: 43bcf707ccdc ("bpf: fix _htons occurences in test_progs")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-09 01:06:25 +08:00
|
|
|
# error "Fix your compiler's __BYTE_ORDER__?!"
|
2017-05-02 03:43:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define bpf_htons(x) \
|
|
|
|
|
(__builtin_constant_p(x) ? \
|
bpf, tests: fix endianness selection
I noticed that test_l4lb was failing in selftests:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 77 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 44 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2933 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1500 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 377 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 544 nsec
test_l4lb:FAIL:stats 6297600000 200000
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 1 FAILED
Tracking down the issue actually revealed that endianness selection
in bpf_endian.h is broken when compiled with clang with bpf target.
test_pkt_access.c, test_l4lb.c is compiled with __BYTE_ORDER as
__BIG_ENDIAN, test_xdp.c as __LITTLE_ENDIAN! test_l4lb noticeably
fails, because the test accounts bytes via bpf_ntohs(ip6h->payload_len)
and bpf_ntohs(iph->tot_len), and compares them against a defined
value and given a wrong endianness, the test outcome is different,
of course.
Turns out that there are actually two bugs: i) when we do __BYTE_ORDER
comparison with __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN, then depending on the
include order we see different outcomes. Reason is that __BYTE_ORDER
is undefined due to missing endian.h include. Before we include the
asm/byteorder.h (e.g. through linux/in.h), then __BYTE_ORDER equals
__LITTLE_ENDIAN since both are undefined, after the include which
correctly pulls in linux/byteorder/little_endian.h, __LITTLE_ENDIAN
is defined, but given __BYTE_ORDER is still undefined, we match on
__BYTE_ORDER equals to __BIG_ENDIAN since __BIG_ENDIAN is also
undefined at that point, sigh. ii) But even that would be wrong,
since when compiling the test cases with clang, one can select between
bpfeb and bpfel targets for cross compilation. Hence, we can also not
rely on what the system's endian.h provides, but we need to look at
the compiler's defined endianness. The compiler defines __BYTE_ORDER__,
and we can match __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ and __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__,
which also reflects targets bpf (native), bpfel, bpfeb correctly,
thus really only rely on that. After patch:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 74 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 42 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2340 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1461 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 400 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 530 nsec
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 0 FAILED
Fixes: 43bcf707ccdc ("bpf: fix _htons occurences in test_progs")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-09 01:06:25 +08:00
|
|
|
__bpf_constant_htons(x) : __bpf_htons(x))
|
2017-05-02 03:43:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#define bpf_ntohs(x) \
|
|
|
|
|
(__builtin_constant_p(x) ? \
|
bpf, tests: fix endianness selection
I noticed that test_l4lb was failing in selftests:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 77 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 44 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2933 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1500 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 377 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 544 nsec
test_l4lb:FAIL:stats 6297600000 200000
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 1 FAILED
Tracking down the issue actually revealed that endianness selection
in bpf_endian.h is broken when compiled with clang with bpf target.
test_pkt_access.c, test_l4lb.c is compiled with __BYTE_ORDER as
__BIG_ENDIAN, test_xdp.c as __LITTLE_ENDIAN! test_l4lb noticeably
fails, because the test accounts bytes via bpf_ntohs(ip6h->payload_len)
and bpf_ntohs(iph->tot_len), and compares them against a defined
value and given a wrong endianness, the test outcome is different,
of course.
Turns out that there are actually two bugs: i) when we do __BYTE_ORDER
comparison with __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN, then depending on the
include order we see different outcomes. Reason is that __BYTE_ORDER
is undefined due to missing endian.h include. Before we include the
asm/byteorder.h (e.g. through linux/in.h), then __BYTE_ORDER equals
__LITTLE_ENDIAN since both are undefined, after the include which
correctly pulls in linux/byteorder/little_endian.h, __LITTLE_ENDIAN
is defined, but given __BYTE_ORDER is still undefined, we match on
__BYTE_ORDER equals to __BIG_ENDIAN since __BIG_ENDIAN is also
undefined at that point, sigh. ii) But even that would be wrong,
since when compiling the test cases with clang, one can select between
bpfeb and bpfel targets for cross compilation. Hence, we can also not
rely on what the system's endian.h provides, but we need to look at
the compiler's defined endianness. The compiler defines __BYTE_ORDER__,
and we can match __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ and __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__,
which also reflects targets bpf (native), bpfel, bpfeb correctly,
thus really only rely on that. After patch:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 74 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 42 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2340 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1461 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 400 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 530 nsec
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 0 FAILED
Fixes: 43bcf707ccdc ("bpf: fix _htons occurences in test_progs")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-09 01:06:25 +08:00
|
|
|
__bpf_constant_ntohs(x) : __bpf_ntohs(x))
|
2017-07-11 05:04:28 +08:00
|
|
|
#define bpf_htonl(x) \
|
|
|
|
|
(__builtin_constant_p(x) ? \
|
|
|
|
|
__bpf_constant_htonl(x) : __bpf_htonl(x))
|
|
|
|
|
#define bpf_ntohl(x) \
|
|
|
|
|
(__builtin_constant_p(x) ? \
|
|
|
|
|
__bpf_constant_ntohl(x) : __bpf_ntohl(x))
|
2017-05-02 03:43:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
bpf, tests: fix endianness selection
I noticed that test_l4lb was failing in selftests:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 77 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 44 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2933 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1500 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 377 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 544 nsec
test_l4lb:FAIL:stats 6297600000 200000
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 1 FAILED
Tracking down the issue actually revealed that endianness selection
in bpf_endian.h is broken when compiled with clang with bpf target.
test_pkt_access.c, test_l4lb.c is compiled with __BYTE_ORDER as
__BIG_ENDIAN, test_xdp.c as __LITTLE_ENDIAN! test_l4lb noticeably
fails, because the test accounts bytes via bpf_ntohs(ip6h->payload_len)
and bpf_ntohs(iph->tot_len), and compares them against a defined
value and given a wrong endianness, the test outcome is different,
of course.
Turns out that there are actually two bugs: i) when we do __BYTE_ORDER
comparison with __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN, then depending on the
include order we see different outcomes. Reason is that __BYTE_ORDER
is undefined due to missing endian.h include. Before we include the
asm/byteorder.h (e.g. through linux/in.h), then __BYTE_ORDER equals
__LITTLE_ENDIAN since both are undefined, after the include which
correctly pulls in linux/byteorder/little_endian.h, __LITTLE_ENDIAN
is defined, but given __BYTE_ORDER is still undefined, we match on
__BYTE_ORDER equals to __BIG_ENDIAN since __BIG_ENDIAN is also
undefined at that point, sigh. ii) But even that would be wrong,
since when compiling the test cases with clang, one can select between
bpfeb and bpfel targets for cross compilation. Hence, we can also not
rely on what the system's endian.h provides, but we need to look at
the compiler's defined endianness. The compiler defines __BYTE_ORDER__,
and we can match __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ and __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__,
which also reflects targets bpf (native), bpfel, bpfeb correctly,
thus really only rely on that. After patch:
# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 74 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 42 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 2340 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1461 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 400 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 530 nsec
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
Summary: 7 PASSED, 0 FAILED
Fixes: 43bcf707ccdc ("bpf: fix _htons occurences in test_progs")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-09 01:06:25 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif /* __BPF_ENDIAN__ */
|