linux/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h

59 lines
1.7 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

#ifndef __ASM_X86_XSAVE_H
#define __ASM_X86_XSAVE_H
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
/* Bit 63 of XCR0 is reserved for future expansion */
x86/fpu: Rename XSAVE macros There are two concepts that have some confusing naming: 1. Extended State Component numbers (currently called XFEATURE_BIT_*) 2. Extended State Component masks (currently called XSTATE_*) The numbers are (currently) from 0-9. State component 3 is the bounds registers for MPX, for instance. But when we want to enable "state component 3", we go set a bit in XCR0. The bit we set is 1<<3. We can check to see if a state component feature is enabled by looking at its bit. The current 'xfeature_bit's are at best xfeature bit _numbers_. Calling them bits is at best inconsistent with ending the enum list with 'XFEATURES_NR_MAX'. This patch renames the enum to be 'xfeature'. These also happen to be what the Intel documentation calls a "state component". We also want to differentiate these from the "XSTATE_*" macros. The "XSTATE_*" macros are a mask, and we rename them to match. These macros are reasonably widely used so this patch is a wee bit big, but this really is just a rename. The only non-mechanical part of this is the s/XSTATE_EXTEND_MASK/XFEATURE_MASK_EXTEND/ We need a better name for it, but that's another patch. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: dave@sr71.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150902233126.38653250@viggo.jf.intel.com [ Ported to v4.3-rc1. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-09-03 07:31:26 +08:00
#define XFEATURE_MASK_EXTEND (~(XFEATURE_MASK_FPSSE | (1ULL << 63)))
#define XSTATE_CPUID 0x0000000d
#define FXSAVE_SIZE 512
#define XSAVE_HDR_SIZE 64
#define XSAVE_HDR_OFFSET FXSAVE_SIZE
#define XSAVE_YMM_SIZE 256
#define XSAVE_YMM_OFFSET (XSAVE_HDR_SIZE + XSAVE_HDR_OFFSET)
/* Supervisor features */
#define XFEATURE_MASK_SUPERVISOR (XFEATURE_MASK_PT)
/* Supported features which support lazy state saving */
x86/fpu: Rename XSAVE macros There are two concepts that have some confusing naming: 1. Extended State Component numbers (currently called XFEATURE_BIT_*) 2. Extended State Component masks (currently called XSTATE_*) The numbers are (currently) from 0-9. State component 3 is the bounds registers for MPX, for instance. But when we want to enable "state component 3", we go set a bit in XCR0. The bit we set is 1<<3. We can check to see if a state component feature is enabled by looking at its bit. The current 'xfeature_bit's are at best xfeature bit _numbers_. Calling them bits is at best inconsistent with ending the enum list with 'XFEATURES_NR_MAX'. This patch renames the enum to be 'xfeature'. These also happen to be what the Intel documentation calls a "state component". We also want to differentiate these from the "XSTATE_*" macros. The "XSTATE_*" macros are a mask, and we rename them to match. These macros are reasonably widely used so this patch is a wee bit big, but this really is just a rename. The only non-mechanical part of this is the s/XSTATE_EXTEND_MASK/XFEATURE_MASK_EXTEND/ We need a better name for it, but that's another patch. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: dave@sr71.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150902233126.38653250@viggo.jf.intel.com [ Ported to v4.3-rc1. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-09-03 07:31:26 +08:00
#define XFEATURE_MASK_LAZY (XFEATURE_MASK_FP | \
x86/fpu: Revert ("x86/fpu: Disable AVX when eagerfpu is off") Leonid Shatz noticed that the SDM interpretation of the following recent commit: 394db20ca240741 ("x86/fpu: Disable AVX when eagerfpu is off") ... is incorrect and that the original behavior of the FPU code was correct. Because AVX is not stated in CR0 TS bit description, it was mistakenly believed to be not supported for lazy context switch. This turns out to be false: Intel Software Developer's Manual Vol. 3A, Sec. 2.5 Control Registers: 'TS Task Switched bit (bit 3 of CR0) -- Allows the saving of the x87 FPU/ MMX/SSE/SSE2/SSE3/SSSE3/SSE4 context on a task switch to be delayed until an x87 FPU/MMX/SSE/SSE2/SSE3/SSSE3/SSE4 instruction is actually executed by the new task.' Intel Software Developer's Manual Vol. 2A, Sec. 2.4 Instruction Exception Specification: 'AVX instructions refer to exceptions by classes that include #NM "Device Not Available" exception for lazy context switch.' So revert the commit. Reported-by: Leonid Shatz <leonid.shatz@ravellosystems.com> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457569734-3785-1-git-send-email-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-03-10 08:28:54 +08:00
XFEATURE_MASK_SSE | \
x86/fpu: Rename XSAVE macros There are two concepts that have some confusing naming: 1. Extended State Component numbers (currently called XFEATURE_BIT_*) 2. Extended State Component masks (currently called XSTATE_*) The numbers are (currently) from 0-9. State component 3 is the bounds registers for MPX, for instance. But when we want to enable "state component 3", we go set a bit in XCR0. The bit we set is 1<<3. We can check to see if a state component feature is enabled by looking at its bit. The current 'xfeature_bit's are at best xfeature bit _numbers_. Calling them bits is at best inconsistent with ending the enum list with 'XFEATURES_NR_MAX'. This patch renames the enum to be 'xfeature'. These also happen to be what the Intel documentation calls a "state component". We also want to differentiate these from the "XSTATE_*" macros. The "XSTATE_*" macros are a mask, and we rename them to match. These macros are reasonably widely used so this patch is a wee bit big, but this really is just a rename. The only non-mechanical part of this is the s/XSTATE_EXTEND_MASK/XFEATURE_MASK_EXTEND/ We need a better name for it, but that's another patch. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: dave@sr71.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150902233126.38653250@viggo.jf.intel.com [ Ported to v4.3-rc1. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-09-03 07:31:26 +08:00
XFEATURE_MASK_YMM | \
x86/fpu: Disable AVX when eagerfpu is off When "eagerfpu=off" is given as a command-line input, the kernel should disable AVX support. The Task Switched bit used for lazy context switching does not support AVX. If AVX is enabled without eagerfpu context switching, one task's AVX state could become corrupted or leak to other tasks. This is a bug and has bad security implications. This only affects systems that have AVX/AVX2/AVX512 and this issue will be found only when one actually uses AVX/AVX2/AVX512 _AND_ does eagerfpu=off. Reference: Intel Software Developer's Manual Vol. 3A Sec. 2.5 Control Registers: TS Task Switched bit (bit 3 of CR0) -- Allows the saving of the x87 FPU/ MMX/SSE/SSE2/SSE3/SSSE3/SSE4 context on a task switch to be delayed until an x87 FPU/MMX/SSE/SSE2/SSE3/SSSE3/SSE4 instruction is actually executed by the new task. Sec. 13.4.1 Using the TS Flag to Control the Saving of the X87 FPU and SSE State When the TS flag is set, the processor monitors the instruction stream for x87 FPU, MMX, SSE instructions. When the processor detects one of these instructions, it raises a device-not-available exeception (#NM) prior to executing the instruction. Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: yu-cheng yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1452119094-7252-5-git-send-email-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-07 06:24:54 +08:00
XFEATURE_MASK_OPMASK | \
x86/fpu: Rename XSAVE macros There are two concepts that have some confusing naming: 1. Extended State Component numbers (currently called XFEATURE_BIT_*) 2. Extended State Component masks (currently called XSTATE_*) The numbers are (currently) from 0-9. State component 3 is the bounds registers for MPX, for instance. But when we want to enable "state component 3", we go set a bit in XCR0. The bit we set is 1<<3. We can check to see if a state component feature is enabled by looking at its bit. The current 'xfeature_bit's are at best xfeature bit _numbers_. Calling them bits is at best inconsistent with ending the enum list with 'XFEATURES_NR_MAX'. This patch renames the enum to be 'xfeature'. These also happen to be what the Intel documentation calls a "state component". We also want to differentiate these from the "XSTATE_*" macros. The "XSTATE_*" macros are a mask, and we rename them to match. These macros are reasonably widely used so this patch is a wee bit big, but this really is just a rename. The only non-mechanical part of this is the s/XSTATE_EXTEND_MASK/XFEATURE_MASK_EXTEND/ We need a better name for it, but that's another patch. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: dave@sr71.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150902233126.38653250@viggo.jf.intel.com [ Ported to v4.3-rc1. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-09-03 07:31:26 +08:00
XFEATURE_MASK_ZMM_Hi256 | \
XFEATURE_MASK_Hi16_ZMM | \
XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU)
x86/fpu: Revert ("x86/fpu: Disable AVX when eagerfpu is off") Leonid Shatz noticed that the SDM interpretation of the following recent commit: 394db20ca240741 ("x86/fpu: Disable AVX when eagerfpu is off") ... is incorrect and that the original behavior of the FPU code was correct. Because AVX is not stated in CR0 TS bit description, it was mistakenly believed to be not supported for lazy context switch. This turns out to be false: Intel Software Developer's Manual Vol. 3A, Sec. 2.5 Control Registers: 'TS Task Switched bit (bit 3 of CR0) -- Allows the saving of the x87 FPU/ MMX/SSE/SSE2/SSE3/SSSE3/SSE4 context on a task switch to be delayed until an x87 FPU/MMX/SSE/SSE2/SSE3/SSSE3/SSE4 instruction is actually executed by the new task.' Intel Software Developer's Manual Vol. 2A, Sec. 2.4 Instruction Exception Specification: 'AVX instructions refer to exceptions by classes that include #NM "Device Not Available" exception for lazy context switch.' So revert the commit. Reported-by: Leonid Shatz <leonid.shatz@ravellosystems.com> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457569734-3785-1-git-send-email-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-03-10 08:28:54 +08:00
/* Supported features which require eager state saving */
#define XFEATURE_MASK_EAGER (XFEATURE_MASK_BNDREGS | XFEATURE_MASK_BNDCSR)
/* All currently supported features */
x86/fpu: Rename XSAVE macros There are two concepts that have some confusing naming: 1. Extended State Component numbers (currently called XFEATURE_BIT_*) 2. Extended State Component masks (currently called XSTATE_*) The numbers are (currently) from 0-9. State component 3 is the bounds registers for MPX, for instance. But when we want to enable "state component 3", we go set a bit in XCR0. The bit we set is 1<<3. We can check to see if a state component feature is enabled by looking at its bit. The current 'xfeature_bit's are at best xfeature bit _numbers_. Calling them bits is at best inconsistent with ending the enum list with 'XFEATURES_NR_MAX'. This patch renames the enum to be 'xfeature'. These also happen to be what the Intel documentation calls a "state component". We also want to differentiate these from the "XSTATE_*" macros. The "XSTATE_*" macros are a mask, and we rename them to match. These macros are reasonably widely used so this patch is a wee bit big, but this really is just a rename. The only non-mechanical part of this is the s/XSTATE_EXTEND_MASK/XFEATURE_MASK_EXTEND/ We need a better name for it, but that's another patch. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: dave@sr71.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150902233126.38653250@viggo.jf.intel.com [ Ported to v4.3-rc1. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-09-03 07:31:26 +08:00
#define XCNTXT_MASK (XFEATURE_MASK_LAZY | XFEATURE_MASK_EAGER)
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
#define REX_PREFIX "0x48, "
#else
#define REX_PREFIX
#endif
extern u64 xfeatures_mask;
extern u64 xstate_fx_sw_bytes[USER_XSTATE_FX_SW_WORDS];
extern void update_regset_xstate_info(unsigned int size, u64 xstate_mask);
void fpu__xstate_clear_all_cpu_caps(void);
void *get_xsave_addr(struct xregs_state *xsave, int xstate);
x86/fpu/xstate: Wrap get_xsave_addr() to make it safer The MPX code appears is calling a low-level FPU function (copy_fpregs_to_fpstate()). This function is not able to be called in all contexts, although it is safe to call directly in some cases. Although probably correct, the current code is ugly and potentially error-prone. So, add a wrapper that calls the (slightly) higher-level fpu__save() (which is preempt- safe) and also ensures that we even *have* an FPU context (in the case that this was called when in lazy FPU mode). Ingo had this to say about the details about when we need preemption disabled: > it's indeed generally unsafe to access/copy FPU registers with preemption enabled, > for two reasons: > > - on older systems that use FSAVE the instruction destroys FPU register > contents, which has to be handled carefully > > - even on newer systems if we copy to FPU registers (which this code doesn't) > then we don't want a context switch to occur in the middle of it, because a > context switch will write to the fpstate, potentially overwriting our new data > with old FPU state. > > But it's safe to access FPU registers with preemption enabled in a couple of > special cases: > > - potentially destructively saving FPU registers: the signal handling code does > this in copy_fpstate_to_sigframe(), because it can rely on the signal restore > side to restore the original FPU state. > > - reading FPU registers on modern systems: we don't do this anywhere at the > moment, mostly to keep symmetry with older systems where FSAVE is > destructive. > > - initializing FPU registers on modern systems: fpu__clear() does this. Here > it's safe because we don't copy from the fpstate. > > - directly writing FPU registers from user-space memory (!). We do this in > fpu__restore_sig(), and it's safe because neither context switches nor > irq-handler FPU use can corrupt the source context of the copy (which is > user-space memory). > > Note that the MPX code's current use of copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() was safe I think, > because: > > - MPX is predicated on eagerfpu, so the destructive F[N]SAVE instruction won't be > used. > > - the code was only reading FPU registers, and was doing it only in places that > guaranteed that an FPU state was already active (i.e. didn't do it in > kthreads) Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com> Cc: bp@alien8.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150607183700.AA881696@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-08 02:37:00 +08:00
const void *get_xsave_field_ptr(int xstate_field);
int using_compacted_format(void);
int copyout_from_xsaves(unsigned int pos, unsigned int count, void *kbuf,
void __user *ubuf, struct xregs_state *xsave);
int copyin_to_xsaves(const void *kbuf, const void __user *ubuf,
struct xregs_state *xsave);
#endif