mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
epoll: fix race between ep_poll_callback(POLLFREE) and ep_free()/ep_remove()
The race was introduced by me in commit971316f050
("epoll: ep_unregister_pollwait() can use the freed pwq->whead"). I did not realize that nothing can protect eventpoll after ep_poll_callback() sets ->whead = NULL, only whead->lock can save us from the race with ep_free() or ep_remove(). Move ->whead = NULL to the end of ep_poll_callback() and add the necessary barriers. TODO: cleanup the ewake/EPOLLEXCLUSIVE logic, it was confusing even before this patch. Hopefully this explains use-after-free reported by syzcaller: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in debug_spin_lock_before ... _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4a/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159 ep_poll_callback+0x29f/0xff0 fs/eventpoll.c:1148 this is spin_lock(eventpoll->lock), ... Freed by task 17774: ... kfree+0xe8/0x2c0 mm/slub.c:3883 ep_free+0x22c/0x2a0 fs/eventpoll.c:865 Fixes:971316f050
("epoll: ep_unregister_pollwait() can use the freed pwq->whead") Reported-by: 范龙飞 <long7573@126.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8cf9f2a29f
commit
138e4ad67a
|
@ -600,8 +600,13 @@ static void ep_remove_wait_queue(struct eppoll_entry *pwq)
|
|||
wait_queue_head_t *whead;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
/* If it is cleared by POLLFREE, it should be rcu-safe */
|
||||
whead = rcu_dereference(pwq->whead);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If it is cleared by POLLFREE, it should be rcu-safe.
|
||||
* If we read NULL we need a barrier paired with
|
||||
* smp_store_release() in ep_poll_callback(), otherwise
|
||||
* we rely on whead->lock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
whead = smp_load_acquire(&pwq->whead);
|
||||
if (whead)
|
||||
remove_wait_queue(whead, &pwq->wait);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
@ -1134,17 +1139,6 @@ static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, v
|
|||
struct eventpoll *ep = epi->ep;
|
||||
int ewake = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((unsigned long)key & POLLFREE) {
|
||||
ep_pwq_from_wait(wait)->whead = NULL;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* whead = NULL above can race with ep_remove_wait_queue()
|
||||
* which can do another remove_wait_queue() after us, so we
|
||||
* can't use __remove_wait_queue(). whead->lock is held by
|
||||
* the caller.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
list_del_init(&wait->entry);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
ep_set_busy_poll_napi_id(epi);
|
||||
|
@ -1228,10 +1222,26 @@ static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, v
|
|||
if (pwake)
|
||||
ep_poll_safewake(&ep->poll_wait);
|
||||
|
||||
if (epi->event.events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE)
|
||||
return ewake;
|
||||
if (!(epi->event.events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE))
|
||||
ewake = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
if ((unsigned long)key & POLLFREE) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we race with ep_remove_wait_queue() it can miss
|
||||
* ->whead = NULL and do another remove_wait_queue() after
|
||||
* us, so we can't use __remove_wait_queue().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
list_del_init(&wait->entry);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* ->whead != NULL protects us from the race with ep_free()
|
||||
* or ep_remove(), ep_remove_wait_queue() takes whead->lock
|
||||
* held by the caller. Once we nullify it, nothing protects
|
||||
* ep/epi or even wait.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_store_release(&ep_pwq_from_wait(wait)->whead, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ewake;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue