mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
x86/mm/fault: Allow stack access below %rsp
The current x86 page fault handler allows stack access below the stack pointer if it is no more than 64k+256 bytes. Any access beyond the 64k+ limit will cause a segmentation fault. The gcc -fstack-check option generates code to probe the stack for large stack allocation to see if the stack is accessible. The newer gcc does that while updating the %rsp simultaneously. Older gcc's like gcc4 doesn't do that. As a result, an application compiled with an old gcc and the -fstack-check option may fail to start at all: $ cat test.c int main() { char tmp[1024*128]; printf("### ok\n"); return 0; } $ gcc -fstack-check -g -o test test.c $ ./test Segmentation fault The old binary was working in older kernels where expand_stack() was somehow called before the check. But it is not working in newer kernels. Besides, the 64k+ limit check is kind of crude and will not catch a lot of mistakes that userspace applications may be misbehaving anyway. I think the kernel isn't the right place for this kind of tests. We should leave it to userspace instrumentation tools to perform them. The 64k+ limit check is now removed to just let expand_stack() decide if a segmentation fault should happen, when the RLIMIT_STACK limit is exceeded, for example. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1541535149-31963-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ccda4af0f4
commit
1d8ca3be86
|
@ -1380,18 +1380,6 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
|
|||
bad_area(regs, sw_error_code, address);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (sw_error_code & X86_PF_USER) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Accessing the stack below %sp is always a bug.
|
||||
* The large cushion allows instructions like enter
|
||||
* and pusha to work. ("enter $65535, $31" pushes
|
||||
* 32 pointers and then decrements %sp by 65535.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(address + 65536 + 32 * sizeof(unsigned long) < regs->sp)) {
|
||||
bad_area(regs, sw_error_code, address);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (unlikely(expand_stack(vma, address))) {
|
||||
bad_area(regs, sw_error_code, address);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue