mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
bpf: Ensure off_reg has no mixed signed bounds for all types
The mixed signed bounds check really belongs into retrieve_ptr_limit()
instead of outside of it in adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(). The reason is
that this check is not tied to PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE only, but to all pointer
types that we handle in retrieve_ptr_limit() and given errors from the latter
propagate back to adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() and lead to rejection of the
program, it's a better place to reside to avoid anything slipping through
for future types. The reason why we must reject such off_reg is that we
otherwise would not be able to derive a mask, see details in 9d7eceede7
("bpf: restrict unknown scalars of mixed signed bounds for unprivileged").
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6f55b2f2a1
commit
24c109bb15
|
@ -5857,12 +5857,18 @@ static struct bpf_insn_aux_data *cur_aux(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int retrieve_ptr_limit(const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg,
|
||||
u32 *ptr_limit, u8 opcode, bool off_is_neg)
|
||||
const struct bpf_reg_state *off_reg,
|
||||
u32 *ptr_limit, u8 opcode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool off_is_neg = off_reg->smin_value < 0;
|
||||
bool mask_to_left = (opcode == BPF_ADD && off_is_neg) ||
|
||||
(opcode == BPF_SUB && !off_is_neg);
|
||||
u32 off, max;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!tnum_is_const(off_reg->var_off) &&
|
||||
(off_reg->smin_value < 0) != (off_reg->smax_value < 0))
|
||||
return -EACCES;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (ptr_reg->type) {
|
||||
case PTR_TO_STACK:
|
||||
/* Offset 0 is out-of-bounds, but acceptable start for the
|
||||
|
@ -5956,7 +5962,7 @@ static int sanitize_ptr_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
|||
alu_state |= ptr_is_dst_reg ?
|
||||
BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_SRC : BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_DST;
|
||||
|
||||
err = retrieve_ptr_limit(ptr_reg, &alu_limit, opcode, off_is_neg);
|
||||
err = retrieve_ptr_limit(ptr_reg, off_reg, &alu_limit, opcode);
|
||||
if (err < 0)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -6036,8 +6042,8 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
|||
smin_ptr = ptr_reg->smin_value, smax_ptr = ptr_reg->smax_value;
|
||||
u64 umin_val = off_reg->umin_value, umax_val = off_reg->umax_value,
|
||||
umin_ptr = ptr_reg->umin_value, umax_ptr = ptr_reg->umax_value;
|
||||
u32 dst = insn->dst_reg, src = insn->src_reg;
|
||||
u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
|
||||
u32 dst = insn->dst_reg;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
dst_reg = ®s[dst];
|
||||
|
@ -6085,13 +6091,6 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
|||
verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic on %s prohibited\n",
|
||||
dst, reg_type_str[ptr_reg->type]);
|
||||
return -EACCES;
|
||||
case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE:
|
||||
if (!env->env->bypass_spec_v1 && !known && (smin_val < 0) != (smax_val < 0)) {
|
||||
verbose(env, "R%d has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds, pointer arithmetic with it prohibited for !root\n",
|
||||
off_reg == dst_reg ? dst : src);
|
||||
return -EACCES;
|
||||
}
|
||||
fallthrough;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue