mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
iommu/vt-d: Clear PRQ overflow only when PRQ is empty
It is incorrect to always clear PRO when it's set w/o first checking whether the overflow condition has been cleared. Current code assumes that if an overflow condition occurs it must have been cleared by earlier loop. However since the code runs in a threaded context, the overflow condition could occur even after setting the head to the tail under some extreme condition. To be sane, we should read both head/tail again when seeing a pending PRO and only clear PRO after all pending PRs have been handled. Suggested-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/MWHPR11MB18862D2EA5BD432BF22D99A48CA09@MWHPR11MB1886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210126080730.2232859-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a8ce9ebbec
commit
28a77185f1
|
@ -1042,8 +1042,17 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d)
|
|||
* Clear the page request overflow bit and wake up all threads that
|
||||
* are waiting for the completion of this handling.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (readl(iommu->reg + DMAR_PRS_REG) & DMA_PRS_PRO)
|
||||
writel(DMA_PRS_PRO, iommu->reg + DMAR_PRS_REG);
|
||||
if (readl(iommu->reg + DMAR_PRS_REG) & DMA_PRS_PRO) {
|
||||
pr_info_ratelimited("IOMMU: %s: PRQ overflow detected\n",
|
||||
iommu->name);
|
||||
head = dmar_readq(iommu->reg + DMAR_PQH_REG) & PRQ_RING_MASK;
|
||||
tail = dmar_readq(iommu->reg + DMAR_PQT_REG) & PRQ_RING_MASK;
|
||||
if (head == tail) {
|
||||
writel(DMA_PRS_PRO, iommu->reg + DMAR_PRS_REG);
|
||||
pr_info_ratelimited("IOMMU: %s: PRQ overflow cleared",
|
||||
iommu->name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!completion_done(&iommu->prq_complete))
|
||||
complete(&iommu->prq_complete);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue