mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
hrtimer: Make remote enqueue decision less restrictive
The current decision whether a timer can be queued on a remote CPU checks for timer->expiry <= remote_cpu_base.expires_next. This is too restrictive because a timer with the same expiry time as an existing timer will be enqueued on right-hand size of the existing timer inside the rbtree, i.e. behind the first expiring timer. So its safe to allow enqueuing timers with the same expiry time as the first expiring timer on a remote CPU base. Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: keescook@chromium.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171221104205.7269-22-anna-maria@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
14c803419d
commit
2ac2dccce9
|
@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ hrtimer_check_target(struct hrtimer *timer, struct hrtimer_clock_base *new_base)
|
|||
ktime_t expires;
|
||||
|
||||
expires = ktime_sub(hrtimer_get_expires(timer), new_base->offset);
|
||||
return expires <= new_base->cpu_base->expires_next;
|
||||
return expires < new_base->cpu_base->expires_next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue