mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
[PATCH] optimise loop driver a bit
Looks like locking can be optimised quite a lot. Increase lock widths slightly so lo_lock is taken fewer times per request. Also it was quite trivial to cover lo_pending with that lock, and remove the atomic requirement. This also makes memory ordering explicitly correct, which is nice (not that I particularly saw any mem ordering bugs). Test was reading 4 250MB files in parallel on ext2-on-tmpfs filesystem (1K block size, 4K page size). System is 2 socket Xeon with HT (4 thread). intel:/home/npiggin# umount /dev/loop0 ; mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/loop ; /usr/bin/time ./mtloop.sh Before: 0.24user 5.51system 0:02.84elapsed 202%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0.19user 5.52system 0:02.88elapsed 198%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0.19user 5.57system 0:02.89elapsed 198%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0.22user 5.51system 0:02.90elapsed 197%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0.19user 5.44system 0:02.91elapsed 193%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k After: 0.07user 2.34system 0:01.68elapsed 143%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0.06user 2.37system 0:01.68elapsed 144%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0.06user 2.39system 0:01.68elapsed 145%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0.06user 2.36system 0:01.68elapsed 144%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0.06user 2.42system 0:01.68elapsed 147%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ab4af03a40
commit
35a82d1a53
|
@ -472,17 +472,11 @@ static int do_bio_filebacked(struct loop_device *lo, struct bio *bio)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
static void loop_add_bio(struct loop_device *lo, struct bio *bio)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&lo->lo_lock, flags);
|
||||
if (lo->lo_biotail) {
|
||||
lo->lo_biotail->bi_next = bio;
|
||||
lo->lo_biotail = bio;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
lo->lo_bio = lo->lo_biotail = bio;
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lo->lo_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
up(&lo->lo_bh_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -492,14 +486,12 @@ static struct bio *loop_get_bio(struct loop_device *lo)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct bio *bio;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
if ((bio = lo->lo_bio)) {
|
||||
if (bio == lo->lo_biotail)
|
||||
lo->lo_biotail = NULL;
|
||||
lo->lo_bio = bio->bi_next;
|
||||
bio->bi_next = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return bio;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -509,35 +501,28 @@ static int loop_make_request(request_queue_t *q, struct bio *old_bio)
|
|||
struct loop_device *lo = q->queuedata;
|
||||
int rw = bio_rw(old_bio);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!lo)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
if (rw == READA)
|
||||
rw = READ;
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(!lo || (rw != READ && rw != WRITE));
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
|
||||
goto inactive;
|
||||
atomic_inc(&lo->lo_pending);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (rw == WRITE) {
|
||||
if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY)
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
} else if (rw == READA) {
|
||||
rw = READ;
|
||||
} else if (rw != READ) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "loop: unknown command (%x)\n", rw);
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
if (unlikely(rw == WRITE && (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY)))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
lo->lo_pending++;
|
||||
loop_add_bio(lo, old_bio);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
up(&lo->lo_bh_mutex);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
err:
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&lo->lo_pending))
|
||||
up(&lo->lo_bh_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
if (lo->lo_pending == 0)
|
||||
up(&lo->lo_bh_mutex);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
bio_io_error(old_bio, old_bio->bi_size);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
inactive:
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -560,13 +545,11 @@ static void do_loop_switch(struct loop_device *, struct switch_request *);
|
|||
|
||||
static inline void loop_handle_bio(struct loop_device *lo, struct bio *bio)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(!bio->bi_bdev)) {
|
||||
do_loop_switch(lo, bio->bi_private);
|
||||
bio_put(bio);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ret = do_bio_filebacked(lo, bio);
|
||||
int ret = do_bio_filebacked(lo, bio);
|
||||
bio_endio(bio, bio->bi_size, ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -594,7 +577,7 @@ static int loop_thread(void *data)
|
|||
set_user_nice(current, -20);
|
||||
|
||||
lo->lo_state = Lo_bound;
|
||||
atomic_inc(&lo->lo_pending);
|
||||
lo->lo_pending = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* up sem, we are running
|
||||
|
@ -602,26 +585,37 @@ static int loop_thread(void *data)
|
|||
up(&lo->lo_sem);
|
||||
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
down_interruptible(&lo->lo_bh_mutex);
|
||||
int pending;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* could be upped because of tear-down, not because of
|
||||
* pending work
|
||||
* interruptible just to not contribute to load avg
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!atomic_read(&lo->lo_pending))
|
||||
if (down_interruptible(&lo->lo_bh_mutex))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* could be upped because of tear-down, not pending work
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(!lo->lo_pending)) {
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bio = loop_get_bio(lo);
|
||||
if (!bio) {
|
||||
printk("loop: missing bio\n");
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
lo->lo_pending--;
|
||||
pending = lo->lo_pending;
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(!bio);
|
||||
loop_handle_bio(lo, bio);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* upped both for pending work and tear-down, lo_pending
|
||||
* will hit zero then
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&lo->lo_pending))
|
||||
if (unlikely(!pending))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -900,7 +894,8 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, struct block_device *bdev)
|
|||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
lo->lo_state = Lo_rundown;
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&lo->lo_pending))
|
||||
lo->lo_pending--;
|
||||
if (!lo->lo_pending)
|
||||
up(&lo->lo_bh_mutex);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct loop_device {
|
|||
struct semaphore lo_sem;
|
||||
struct semaphore lo_ctl_mutex;
|
||||
struct semaphore lo_bh_mutex;
|
||||
atomic_t lo_pending;
|
||||
int lo_pending;
|
||||
|
||||
request_queue_t *lo_queue;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue