mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
KVM: hyperv: fix locking of struct kvm_hv fields
Introduce a new mutex to avoid an AB-BA deadlock between kvm->lock and vcpu->mutex. Protect accesses in kvm_hv_setup_tsc_page too, as suggested by Roman. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
83781d180b
commit
3f5ad8be37
|
@ -13,8 +13,12 @@ The acquisition orders for mutexes are as follows:
|
|||
- kvm->slots_lock is taken outside kvm->irq_lock, though acquiring
|
||||
them together is quite rare.
|
||||
|
||||
For spinlocks, kvm_lock is taken outside kvm->mmu_lock. Everything
|
||||
else is a leaf: no other lock is taken inside the critical sections.
|
||||
On x86, vcpu->mutex is taken outside kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock.
|
||||
|
||||
For spinlocks, kvm_lock is taken outside kvm->mmu_lock.
|
||||
|
||||
Everything else is a leaf: no other lock is taken inside the critical
|
||||
sections.
|
||||
|
||||
2: Exception
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -704,6 +704,7 @@ struct kvm_apic_map {
|
|||
|
||||
/* Hyper-V emulation context */
|
||||
struct kvm_hv {
|
||||
struct mutex hv_lock;
|
||||
u64 hv_guest_os_id;
|
||||
u64 hv_hypercall;
|
||||
u64 hv_tsc_page;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -852,6 +852,10 @@ void kvm_hv_setup_tsc_page(struct kvm *kvm,
|
|||
if (!(hv->hv_tsc_page & HV_X64_MSR_TSC_REFERENCE_ENABLE))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
|
||||
if (!(hv->hv_tsc_page & HV_X64_MSR_TSC_REFERENCE_ENABLE))
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
gfn = hv->hv_tsc_page >> HV_X64_MSR_TSC_REFERENCE_ADDRESS_SHIFT;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Because the TSC parameters only vary when there is a
|
||||
|
@ -859,7 +863,7 @@ void kvm_hv_setup_tsc_page(struct kvm *kvm,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(kvm_read_guest(kvm, gfn_to_gpa(gfn),
|
||||
&tsc_seq, sizeof(tsc_seq))))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* While we're computing and writing the parameters, force the
|
||||
|
@ -868,15 +872,15 @@ void kvm_hv_setup_tsc_page(struct kvm *kvm,
|
|||
hv->tsc_ref.tsc_sequence = 0;
|
||||
if (kvm_write_guest(kvm, gfn_to_gpa(gfn),
|
||||
&hv->tsc_ref, sizeof(hv->tsc_ref.tsc_sequence)))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!compute_tsc_page_parameters(hv_clock, &hv->tsc_ref))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Ensure sequence is zero before writing the rest of the struct. */
|
||||
smp_wmb();
|
||||
if (kvm_write_guest(kvm, gfn_to_gpa(gfn), &hv->tsc_ref, sizeof(hv->tsc_ref)))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Now switch to the TSC page mechanism by writing the sequence.
|
||||
|
@ -891,6 +895,8 @@ void kvm_hv_setup_tsc_page(struct kvm *kvm,
|
|||
hv->tsc_ref.tsc_sequence = tsc_seq;
|
||||
kvm_write_guest(kvm, gfn_to_gpa(gfn),
|
||||
&hv->tsc_ref, sizeof(hv->tsc_ref.tsc_sequence));
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int kvm_hv_set_msr_pw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data,
|
||||
|
@ -1142,9 +1148,9 @@ int kvm_hv_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data, bool host)
|
|||
if (kvm_hv_msr_partition_wide(msr)) {
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
|
||||
r = kvm_hv_set_msr_pw(vcpu, msr, data, host);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
return kvm_hv_set_msr(vcpu, msr, data, host);
|
||||
|
@ -1155,9 +1161,9 @@ int kvm_hv_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *pdata)
|
|||
if (kvm_hv_msr_partition_wide(msr)) {
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
|
||||
r = kvm_hv_get_msr_pw(vcpu, msr, pdata);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
return kvm_hv_get_msr(vcpu, msr, pdata);
|
||||
|
@ -1165,7 +1171,7 @@ int kvm_hv_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *pdata)
|
|||
|
||||
bool kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(struct kvm *kvm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_hypercall & HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL_ENABLE;
|
||||
return READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_hypercall) & HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL_ENABLE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void kvm_hv_hypercall_set_result(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 result)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -7881,6 +7881,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
|
|||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.tsc_write_lock);
|
||||
mutex_init(&kvm->arch.apic_map_lock);
|
||||
mutex_init(&kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset = -ktime_get_boot_ns();
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue