mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
Merge branch 'fixes-2.6.39' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq
* 'fixes-2.6.39' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq: workqueue: fix deadlock in worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() workqueue: Document debugging tricks Fix up trivial spelling conflict in kernel/workqueue.c
This commit is contained in:
commit
3fd9952df4
|
@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ CONTENTS
|
|||
4. Application Programming Interface (API)
|
||||
5. Example Execution Scenarios
|
||||
6. Guidelines
|
||||
7. Debugging
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1. Introduction
|
||||
|
@ -379,3 +380,42 @@ If q1 has WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE set,
|
|||
* Unless work items are expected to consume a huge amount of CPU
|
||||
cycles, using a bound wq is usually beneficial due to the increased
|
||||
level of locality in wq operations and work item execution.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
7. Debugging
|
||||
|
||||
Because the work functions are executed by generic worker threads
|
||||
there are a few tricks needed to shed some light on misbehaving
|
||||
workqueue users.
|
||||
|
||||
Worker threads show up in the process list as:
|
||||
|
||||
root 5671 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:07 0:00 [kworker/0:1]
|
||||
root 5672 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:07 0:00 [kworker/1:2]
|
||||
root 5673 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:12 0:00 [kworker/0:0]
|
||||
root 5674 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:13 0:00 [kworker/1:0]
|
||||
|
||||
If kworkers are going crazy (using too much cpu), there are two types
|
||||
of possible problems:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Something beeing scheduled in rapid succession
|
||||
2. A single work item that consumes lots of cpu cycles
|
||||
|
||||
The first one can be tracked using tracing:
|
||||
|
||||
$ echo workqueue:workqueue_queue_work > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_event
|
||||
$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe > out.txt
|
||||
(wait a few secs)
|
||||
^C
|
||||
|
||||
If something is busy looping on work queueing, it would be dominating
|
||||
the output and the offender can be determined with the work item
|
||||
function.
|
||||
|
||||
For the second type of problems it should be possible to just check
|
||||
the stack trace of the offending worker thread.
|
||||
|
||||
$ cat /proc/THE_OFFENDING_KWORKER/stack
|
||||
|
||||
The work item's function should be trivially visible in the stack
|
||||
trace.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1291,8 +1291,14 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
|
|||
return true;
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* CPU has come up in between, retry migration */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We've raced with CPU hot[un]plug. Give it a breather
|
||||
* and retry migration. cond_resched() is required here;
|
||||
* otherwise, we might deadlock against cpu_stop trying to
|
||||
* bring down the CPU on non-preemptive kernel.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cpu_relax();
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue