mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
bpf, riscv: Enable zext optimization for more RV64G ALU ops
Commit66d0d5a854
("riscv: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen") added the new zero-extension optimization for some BPF ALU operations. Since then, bugs in the JIT that have been fixed in the bpf tree require this optimization to be added to other operations: commit1e692f09e0
("bpf, riscv: clear high 32 bits for ALU32 add/sub/neg/lsh/rsh/arsh"), and commitfe121ee531
("bpf, riscv: clear target register high 32-bits for and/or/xor on ALU32"). Now that these have been merged to bpf-next, the zext optimization can be enabled for the fixed operations. Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com> Cc: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com> Cc: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Cc: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
aa52bcbe0e
commit
46dd3d7d28
|
@ -757,31 +757,31 @@ static int emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
|
|||
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_X:
|
||||
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_X:
|
||||
emit(is64 ? rv_add(rd, rd, rs) : rv_addw(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
|
||||
if (!is64)
|
||||
if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
|
||||
emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_X:
|
||||
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_X:
|
||||
emit(is64 ? rv_sub(rd, rd, rs) : rv_subw(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
|
||||
if (!is64)
|
||||
if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
|
||||
emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_ALU | BPF_AND | BPF_X:
|
||||
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_AND | BPF_X:
|
||||
emit(rv_and(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
|
||||
if (!is64)
|
||||
if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
|
||||
emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_ALU | BPF_OR | BPF_X:
|
||||
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_X:
|
||||
emit(rv_or(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
|
||||
if (!is64)
|
||||
if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
|
||||
emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_X:
|
||||
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_X:
|
||||
emit(rv_xor(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
|
||||
if (!is64)
|
||||
if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
|
||||
emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_X:
|
||||
|
@ -811,13 +811,13 @@ static int emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
|
|||
case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
|
||||
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
|
||||
emit(is64 ? rv_srl(rd, rd, rs) : rv_srlw(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
|
||||
if (!is64)
|
||||
if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
|
||||
emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X:
|
||||
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X:
|
||||
emit(is64 ? rv_sra(rd, rd, rs) : rv_sraw(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
|
||||
if (!is64)
|
||||
if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
|
||||
emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static int emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
|
|||
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_NEG:
|
||||
emit(is64 ? rv_sub(rd, RV_REG_ZERO, rd) :
|
||||
rv_subw(rd, RV_REG_ZERO, rd), ctx);
|
||||
if (!is64)
|
||||
if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
|
||||
emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue