mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
tun, bpf: fix suspicious RCU usage in tun_{attach, detach}_filter
Sasha Levin reported a suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() warning found while fuzzing with trinity that is similar to this one: [ 52.765684] net/core/filter.c:2262 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! [ 52.765688] other info that might help us debug this: [ 52.765695] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1 [ 52.765701] 1 lock held by a.out/1525: [ 52.765704] #0: (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff816a64b7>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20 [ 52.765721] stack backtrace: [ 52.765728] CPU: 1 PID: 1525 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.5.0+ #264 [...] [ 52.765768] Call Trace: [ 52.765775] [<ffffffff813e488d>] dump_stack+0x85/0xc8 [ 52.765784] [<ffffffff810f2fa5>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xd5/0x110 [ 52.765792] [<ffffffff816afdc2>] sk_detach_filter+0x82/0x90 [ 52.765801] [<ffffffffa0883425>] tun_detach_filter+0x35/0x90 [tun] [ 52.765810] [<ffffffffa0884ed4>] __tun_chr_ioctl+0x354/0x1130 [tun] [ 52.765818] [<ffffffff8136fed0>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x130/0x210 [ 52.765827] [<ffffffffa0885ce3>] tun_chr_ioctl+0x13/0x20 [tun] [ 52.765834] [<ffffffff81260ea6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x690 [ 52.765843] [<ffffffff81364af3>] ? security_file_ioctl+0x43/0x60 [ 52.765850] [<ffffffff81261519>] SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90 [ 52.765858] [<ffffffff81003ba2>] do_syscall_64+0x62/0x140 [ 52.765866] [<ffffffff817d563f>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 Same can be triggered with PROVE_RCU (+ PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY) enabled from tun_attach_filter() when user space calls ioctl(tun_fd, TUN{ATTACH, DETACH}FILTER, ...) for adding/removing a BPF filter on tap devices. Since the fix inf91ff5b9ff
("net: sk_{detach|attach}_filter() rcu fixes") sk_attach_filter()/sk_detach_filter() now dereferences the filter with rcu_dereference_protected(), checking whether socket lock is held in control path. Since its introduction in9940516259
("tun: socket filter support"), tap filters are managed under RTNL lock from __tun_chr_ioctl(). Thus the sock_owned_by_user(sk) doesn't apply in this specific case and therefore triggers the false positive. Extend the BPF API with __sk_attach_filter()/__sk_detach_filter() pair that is used by tap filters and pass in lockdep_rtnl_is_held() for the rcu_dereference_protected() checks instead. Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
79f4223257
commit
5a5abb1fa3
|
@ -622,7 +622,8 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file, bool skip_filte
|
|||
|
||||
/* Re-attach the filter to persist device */
|
||||
if (!skip_filter && (tun->filter_attached == true)) {
|
||||
err = sk_attach_filter(&tun->fprog, tfile->socket.sk);
|
||||
err = __sk_attach_filter(&tun->fprog, tfile->socket.sk,
|
||||
lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
|
||||
if (!err)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1822,7 +1823,7 @@ static void tun_detach_filter(struct tun_struct *tun, int n)
|
|||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
||||
tfile = rtnl_dereference(tun->tfiles[i]);
|
||||
sk_detach_filter(tfile->socket.sk);
|
||||
__sk_detach_filter(tfile->socket.sk, lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tun->filter_attached = false;
|
||||
|
@ -1835,7 +1836,8 @@ static int tun_attach_filter(struct tun_struct *tun)
|
|||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < tun->numqueues; i++) {
|
||||
tfile = rtnl_dereference(tun->tfiles[i]);
|
||||
ret = sk_attach_filter(&tun->fprog, tfile->socket.sk);
|
||||
ret = __sk_attach_filter(&tun->fprog, tfile->socket.sk,
|
||||
lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
tun_detach_filter(tun, i);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -465,10 +465,14 @@ int bpf_prog_create_from_user(struct bpf_prog **pfp, struct sock_fprog *fprog,
|
|||
void bpf_prog_destroy(struct bpf_prog *fp);
|
||||
|
||||
int sk_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk);
|
||||
int __sk_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk,
|
||||
bool locked);
|
||||
int sk_attach_bpf(u32 ufd, struct sock *sk);
|
||||
int sk_reuseport_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk);
|
||||
int sk_reuseport_attach_bpf(u32 ufd, struct sock *sk);
|
||||
int sk_detach_filter(struct sock *sk);
|
||||
int __sk_detach_filter(struct sock *sk, bool locked);
|
||||
|
||||
int sk_get_filter(struct sock *sk, struct sock_filter __user *filter,
|
||||
unsigned int len);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1149,7 +1149,8 @@ void bpf_prog_destroy(struct bpf_prog *fp)
|
|||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_prog_destroy);
|
||||
|
||||
static int __sk_attach_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct sock *sk)
|
||||
static int __sk_attach_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct sock *sk,
|
||||
bool locked)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sk_filter *fp, *old_fp;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1165,10 +1166,8 @@ static int __sk_attach_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct sock *sk)
|
|||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
old_fp = rcu_dereference_protected(sk->sk_filter,
|
||||
sock_owned_by_user(sk));
|
||||
old_fp = rcu_dereference_protected(sk->sk_filter, locked);
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(sk->sk_filter, fp);
|
||||
|
||||
if (old_fp)
|
||||
sk_filter_uncharge(sk, old_fp);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1247,7 +1246,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *__get_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk)
|
|||
* occurs or there is insufficient memory for the filter a negative
|
||||
* errno code is returned. On success the return is zero.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int sk_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk)
|
||||
int __sk_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk,
|
||||
bool locked)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bpf_prog *prog = __get_filter(fprog, sk);
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
@ -1255,7 +1255,7 @@ int sk_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk)
|
|||
if (IS_ERR(prog))
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(prog);
|
||||
|
||||
err = __sk_attach_prog(prog, sk);
|
||||
err = __sk_attach_prog(prog, sk, locked);
|
||||
if (err < 0) {
|
||||
__bpf_prog_release(prog);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
@ -1263,7 +1263,12 @@ int sk_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk)
|
|||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_attach_filter);
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__sk_attach_filter);
|
||||
|
||||
int sk_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return __sk_attach_filter(fprog, sk, sock_owned_by_user(sk));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int sk_reuseport_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -1309,7 +1314,7 @@ int sk_attach_bpf(u32 ufd, struct sock *sk)
|
|||
if (IS_ERR(prog))
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(prog);
|
||||
|
||||
err = __sk_attach_prog(prog, sk);
|
||||
err = __sk_attach_prog(prog, sk, sock_owned_by_user(sk));
|
||||
if (err < 0) {
|
||||
bpf_prog_put(prog);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
@ -2250,7 +2255,7 @@ static int __init register_sk_filter_ops(void)
|
|||
}
|
||||
late_initcall(register_sk_filter_ops);
|
||||
|
||||
int sk_detach_filter(struct sock *sk)
|
||||
int __sk_detach_filter(struct sock *sk, bool locked)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret = -ENOENT;
|
||||
struct sk_filter *filter;
|
||||
|
@ -2258,8 +2263,7 @@ int sk_detach_filter(struct sock *sk)
|
|||
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_FILTER_LOCKED))
|
||||
return -EPERM;
|
||||
|
||||
filter = rcu_dereference_protected(sk->sk_filter,
|
||||
sock_owned_by_user(sk));
|
||||
filter = rcu_dereference_protected(sk->sk_filter, locked);
|
||||
if (filter) {
|
||||
RCU_INIT_POINTER(sk->sk_filter, NULL);
|
||||
sk_filter_uncharge(sk, filter);
|
||||
|
@ -2268,7 +2272,12 @@ int sk_detach_filter(struct sock *sk)
|
|||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_detach_filter);
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__sk_detach_filter);
|
||||
|
||||
int sk_detach_filter(struct sock *sk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return __sk_detach_filter(sk, sock_owned_by_user(sk));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int sk_get_filter(struct sock *sk, struct sock_filter __user *ubuf,
|
||||
unsigned int len)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue