mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event
What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier. Kill CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE and fix its usage sites. This also updates the numbering of notifier events to remove holes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1453863fb0
commit
6bfb7c7434
|
@ -55,16 +55,13 @@ transition notifiers.
|
|||
----------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
These are notified when a new policy is intended to be set. Each
|
||||
CPUFreq policy notifier is called three times for a policy transition:
|
||||
CPUFreq policy notifier is called twice for a policy transition:
|
||||
|
||||
1.) During CPUFREQ_ADJUST all CPUFreq notifiers may change the limit if
|
||||
they see a need for this - may it be thermal considerations or
|
||||
hardware limitations.
|
||||
|
||||
2.) During CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE only changes may be done in order to avoid
|
||||
hardware failure.
|
||||
|
||||
3.) And during CPUFREQ_NOTIFY all notifiers are informed of the new policy
|
||||
2.) And during CPUFREQ_NOTIFY all notifiers are informed of the new policy
|
||||
- if two hardware drivers failed to agree on a new policy before this
|
||||
stage, the incompatible hardware shall be shut down, and the user
|
||||
informed of this.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_ppc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
|
|||
if (ignore_ppc)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (event != CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE)
|
||||
if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&performance_mutex);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2206,10 +2206,6 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
|||
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
|
||||
CPUFREQ_ADJUST, new_policy);
|
||||
|
||||
/* adjust if necessary - hardware incompatibility*/
|
||||
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
|
||||
CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, new_policy);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* verify the cpu speed can be set within this limit, which might be
|
||||
* different to the first one
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ static int pmi_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
|
|||
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *cbe_freqs;
|
||||
u8 node;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Should this really be called for CPUFREQ_ADJUST, CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE
|
||||
* and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY policy events?)
|
||||
/* Should this really be called for CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY
|
||||
* policy events?)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (event == CPUFREQ_START)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1668,7 +1668,6 @@ pxafb_freq_policy(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, void *data)
|
|||
|
||||
switch (val) {
|
||||
case CPUFREQ_ADJUST:
|
||||
case CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE:
|
||||
pr_debug("min dma period: %d ps, "
|
||||
"new clock %d kHz\n", pxafb_display_dma_period(var),
|
||||
policy->max);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1042,7 +1042,6 @@ sa1100fb_freq_policy(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
|
|||
|
||||
switch (val) {
|
||||
case CPUFREQ_ADJUST:
|
||||
case CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE:
|
||||
dev_dbg(fbi->dev, "min dma period: %d ps, "
|
||||
"new clock %d kHz\n", sa1100fb_min_dma_period(fbi),
|
||||
policy->max);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -369,11 +369,10 @@ static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {}
|
|||
|
||||
/* Policy Notifiers */
|
||||
#define CPUFREQ_ADJUST (0)
|
||||
#define CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE (1)
|
||||
#define CPUFREQ_NOTIFY (2)
|
||||
#define CPUFREQ_START (3)
|
||||
#define CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY (4)
|
||||
#define CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY (5)
|
||||
#define CPUFREQ_NOTIFY (1)
|
||||
#define CPUFREQ_START (2)
|
||||
#define CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY (3)
|
||||
#define CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY (4)
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
|
||||
int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned int list);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue