From 6d85028134d3f4f946924e2f9f0aaff47d9de840 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:00:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] spi: fix SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK() regression Geert points out that I confused the min/max arguments that are reversed between SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK() and GENMASK(). This time I have verified the result of the macro after fixing the arguments. Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven Fixes: eefffb42f665 ("spi: work around clang bug in SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK()") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- include/linux/spi/spi.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h index b27386450089..a0975cf76cf6 100644 --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ struct spi_controller { /* bitmask of supported bits_per_word for transfers */ u32 bits_per_word_mask; #define SPI_BPW_MASK(bits) BIT((bits) - 1) -#define SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(min, max) GENMASK((min) - 1, (max) - 1) +#define SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(min, max) GENMASK((max) - 1, (min) - 1) /* limits on transfer speed */ u32 min_speed_hz;