openkylin
/
linux
mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
9
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

selftests/bpf: test cases for pkt/null checks in subprogs 

The first test case, for pointer null checks, is equivalent to the
following pseudo-code.  It checks that the verifier does not complain on
line 6 and recognizes that ptr isn't null.

1: ptr = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key);
2: ret = subprog(ptr) {
3:   return ptr != NULL;
4: }
5: if (ret)
6:   value = *ptr;

The second test case, for packet bound checks, is equivalent to the
following pseudo-code.  It checks that the verifier does not complain on
line 7 and recognizes that the packet is at least 1 byte long.

1: pkt_end = ctx.pkt_end;
2: ptr = ctx.pkt + 8;
3: ret = subprog(ptr, pkt_end) {
4:   return ptr <= pkt_end;
5: }
6: if (ret)
7:   value = *(u8 *)ctx.pkt;

Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@orange.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Paul Chaignon 2019-04-24 21:51:26 +02:00 committed by Alexei Starovoitov
parent c6a9efa1d8
commit 6dd7f14080
2 changed files with 47 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
View File

@ -374,6 +374,31 @@
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: ptr null check in subprog",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 3),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only",
.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 0,
},
{
"calls: two calls with args",
.insns = {

22
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
View File

@ -631,3 +631,25 @@
.errstr = "invalid access to packet",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test29 (reg > pkt_end in subprog)",
.insns = {
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_6),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 8),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 4),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 1),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},