nfsd: 4.1 has an rfc number

No need to refer to an internet draft; there's an RFC now.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
This commit is contained in:
J. Bruce Fields 2010-01-20 17:17:04 -05:00
parent 8b8aae4009
commit 73834d6f90
1 changed files with 2 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -17,8 +17,7 @@ kernels must turn 4.1 on or off *before* turning support for version 4
on or off; rpc.nfsd does this correctly.) on or off; rpc.nfsd does this correctly.)
The NFSv4 minorversion 1 (NFSv4.1) implementation in nfsd is based The NFSv4 minorversion 1 (NFSv4.1) implementation in nfsd is based
on the latest NFSv4.1 Internet Draft: on RFC 5661.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1-29
From the many new features in NFSv4.1 the current implementation From the many new features in NFSv4.1 the current implementation
focuses on the mandatory-to-implement NFSv4.1 Sessions, providing focuses on the mandatory-to-implement NFSv4.1 Sessions, providing
@ -44,7 +43,7 @@ interoperability problems with future clients. Known issues:
trunking, but this is a mandatory feature, and its use is trunking, but this is a mandatory feature, and its use is
recommended to clients in a number of places. (E.g. to ensure recommended to clients in a number of places. (E.g. to ensure
timely renewal in case an existing connection's retry timeouts timely renewal in case an existing connection's retry timeouts
have gotten too long; see section 8.3 of the draft.) have gotten too long; see section 8.3 of the RFC.)
Therefore, lack of this feature may cause future clients to Therefore, lack of this feature may cause future clients to
fail. fail.
- Incomplete backchannel support: incomplete backchannel gss - Incomplete backchannel support: incomplete backchannel gss