mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
bpf/verifier: improve disassembly of BPF_NEG instructions
BPF_NEG takes only one operand, unlike the bulk of BPF_ALU[64] which are compound-assignments. So give it its own format in print_bpf_insn(). Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2b7c6ba945
commit
73c864b383
|
@ -351,6 +351,11 @@ static void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
|||
verbose("BUG_alu64_%02x\n", insn->code);
|
||||
else
|
||||
print_bpf_end_insn(env, insn);
|
||||
} else if (BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_NEG) {
|
||||
verbose("(%02x) r%d = %s-r%d\n",
|
||||
insn->code, insn->dst_reg,
|
||||
class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
|
||||
insn->dst_reg);
|
||||
} else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
|
||||
verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %sr%d\n",
|
||||
insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue