KVM: s390: handle missing 64-bit-SCAO facility

Without that facility, we may only use scaol. So fallback
to DMA allocation in that case, so we won't overwrite random memory
via the SIE.

Also disallow ESCA, so we don't have to handle that allocation case.

Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Hildenbrand 2015-11-24 13:33:49 +01:00 committed by Christian Borntraeger
parent 4013ade3fb
commit 76a6dd7241
1 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -317,8 +317,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
break;
case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = sclp.has_esca ? KVM_S390_ESCA_CPU_SLOTS
: KVM_S390_BSCA_CPU_SLOTS;
r = KVM_S390_BSCA_CPU_SLOTS;
if (sclp.has_esca && sclp.has_64bscao)
r = KVM_S390_ESCA_CPU_SLOTS;
break;
case KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS:
r = KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS;
@ -1295,6 +1296,7 @@ static void sca_dispose(struct kvm *kvm)
int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
{
gfp_t alloc_flags = GFP_KERNEL;
int i, rc;
char debug_name[16];
static unsigned long sca_offset;
@ -1319,8 +1321,10 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
ratelimit_state_init(&kvm->arch.sthyi_limit, 5 * HZ, 500);
kvm->arch.use_esca = 0; /* start with basic SCA */
if (!sclp.has_64bscao)
alloc_flags |= GFP_DMA;
rwlock_init(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
kvm->arch.sca = (struct bsca_block *) get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
kvm->arch.sca = (struct bsca_block *) get_zeroed_page(alloc_flags);
if (!kvm->arch.sca)
goto out_err;
spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
@ -1567,7 +1571,7 @@ static int sca_can_add_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
if (id < KVM_S390_BSCA_CPU_SLOTS)
return true;
if (!sclp.has_esca)
if (!sclp.has_esca || !sclp.has_64bscao)
return false;
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);