mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
vmscan: low order lumpy reclaim also should use PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC
Commit33c120ed28
("more aggressively use lumpy reclaim") increased how aggressive lumpy reclaim was by isolating both active and inactive pages for asynchronous lumpy reclaim on costly-high-order pages and for cheap-high-order when memory pressure is high. However, if the system is under heavy pressure and there are dirty pages, asynchronous IO may not be sufficient to reclaim a suitable page in time. This patch causes the caller to enter synchronous lumpy reclaim for costly-high-order pages and for cheap-high-order pages when under memory pressure. Minchan.kim@gmail.com said: Andy added synchronous lumpy reclaim withc661b078fd
. At that time, lumpy reclaim is not agressive. His intension is just for high-order users.(above PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER). After some time, Rik added aggressive lumpy reclaim with33c120ed28
. His intention was to do lumpy reclaim when high-order users and trouble getting a small set of contiguous pages. So we also have to add synchronous pageout for small set of contiguous pages. Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <Minchan.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d2bf6be8ab
commit
78dc583d3a
29
mm/vmscan.c
29
mm/vmscan.c
|
@ -1061,6 +1061,19 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan,
|
|||
unsigned long nr_scanned = 0;
|
||||
unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
|
||||
struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
|
||||
int lumpy_reclaim = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we need a large contiguous chunk of memory, or have
|
||||
* trouble getting a small set of contiguous pages, we
|
||||
* will reclaim both active and inactive pages.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We use the same threshold as pageout congestion_wait below.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
|
||||
lumpy_reclaim = 1;
|
||||
else if (sc->order && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
|
||||
lumpy_reclaim = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
pagevec_init(&pvec, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1073,19 +1086,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan,
|
|||
unsigned long nr_freed;
|
||||
unsigned long nr_active;
|
||||
unsigned int count[NR_LRU_LISTS] = { 0, };
|
||||
int mode = ISOLATE_INACTIVE;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we need a large contiguous chunk of memory, or have
|
||||
* trouble getting a small set of contiguous pages, we
|
||||
* will reclaim both active and inactive pages.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We use the same threshold as pageout congestion_wait below.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
|
||||
mode = ISOLATE_BOTH;
|
||||
else if (sc->order && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
|
||||
mode = ISOLATE_BOTH;
|
||||
int mode = lumpy_reclaim ? ISOLATE_BOTH : ISOLATE_INACTIVE;
|
||||
|
||||
nr_taken = sc->isolate_pages(sc->swap_cluster_max,
|
||||
&page_list, &nr_scan, sc->order, mode,
|
||||
|
@ -1122,7 +1123,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan,
|
|||
* but that should be acceptable to the caller
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (nr_freed < nr_taken && !current_is_kswapd() &&
|
||||
sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) {
|
||||
lumpy_reclaim) {
|
||||
congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue