gcc-9: don't warn about uninitialized btrfs extent_type variable

The 'extent_type' variable does seem to be reliably initialized, but
it's _very_ non-obvious, since there's a "goto next" case that jumps
over the normal initialization.  That will then always trigger the
"start >= extent_end" test, which will end up never falling through to
the use of that variable.

But the code is certainly not obvious, and the compiler warning looks
reasonable.  Make 'extent_type' an int, and initialize it to an invalid
negative value, which seems to be the common pattern in other places.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds 2019-05-01 12:19:20 -07:00
parent 459e3a2153
commit 7e74e235bb
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -6783,7 +6783,7 @@ struct extent_map *btrfs_get_extent(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
u64 extent_start = 0;
u64 extent_end = 0;
u64 objectid = btrfs_ino(inode);
u8 extent_type;
int extent_type = -1;
struct btrfs_path *path = NULL;
struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *item;