diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c index f9aab1590df8..a7ad532dfd9a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c @@ -1335,105 +1335,50 @@ static void rs_set_expected_tpt_table(struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta, tbl->expected_tpt = rs_get_expected_tpt_table(lq_sta, column, rate->bw); } -/* - * Find starting rate for new "search" high-throughput mode of modulation. - * Goal is to find lowest expected rate (under perfect conditions) that is - * above the current measured throughput of "active" mode, to give new mode - * a fair chance to prove itself without too many challenges. - * - * This gets called when transitioning to more aggressive modulation - * (i.e. legacy to SISO or MIMO, or SISO to MIMO), as well as less aggressive - * (i.e. MIMO to SISO). When moving to MIMO, bit rate will typically need - * to decrease to match "active" throughput. When moving from MIMO to SISO, - * bit rate will typically need to increase, but not if performance was bad. - */ static s32 rs_get_best_rate(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta, struct iwl_scale_tbl_info *tbl, /* "search" */ - u16 rate_mask, s8 index) + unsigned long rate_mask, s8 index) { - /* "active" values */ struct iwl_scale_tbl_info *active_tbl = &(lq_sta->lq_info[lq_sta->active_tbl]); - s32 active_sr = active_tbl->win[index].success_ratio; - s32 active_tpt = active_tbl->expected_tpt[index]; - /* expected "search" throughput */ + s32 success_ratio = active_tbl->win[index].success_ratio; + u16 expected_current_tpt = active_tbl->expected_tpt[index]; const u16 *tpt_tbl = tbl->expected_tpt; - - s32 new_rate, high, low, start_hi; u16 high_low; - s8 rate = index; + u32 target_tpt; + int rate_idx; - new_rate = high = low = start_hi = IWL_RATE_INVALID; - - while (1) { - high_low = rs_get_adjacent_rate(mvm, rate, rate_mask, - tbl->rate.type); - - low = high_low & 0xff; - high = (high_low >> 8) & 0xff; - - /* - * Lower the "search" bit rate, to give new "search" mode - * approximately the same throughput as "active" if: - * - * 1) "Active" mode has been working modestly well (but not - * great), and expected "search" throughput (under perfect - * conditions) at candidate rate is above the actual - * measured "active" throughput (but less than expected - * "active" throughput under perfect conditions). - * OR - * 2) "Active" mode has been working perfectly or very well - * and expected "search" throughput (under perfect - * conditions) at candidate rate is above expected - * "active" throughput (under perfect conditions). - */ - if ((((100 * tpt_tbl[rate]) > lq_sta->last_tpt) && - ((active_sr > RS_SR_FORCE_DECREASE) && - (active_sr <= IWL_RATE_HIGH_TH) && - (tpt_tbl[rate] <= active_tpt))) || - ((active_sr >= IWL_RATE_SCALE_SWITCH) && - (tpt_tbl[rate] > active_tpt))) { - /* (2nd or later pass) - * If we've already tried to raise the rate, and are - * now trying to lower it, use the higher rate. */ - if (start_hi != IWL_RATE_INVALID) { - new_rate = start_hi; - break; - } - - new_rate = rate; - - /* Loop again with lower rate */ - if (low != IWL_RATE_INVALID) - rate = low; - - /* Lower rate not available, use the original */ - else - break; - - /* Else try to raise the "search" rate to match "active" */ - } else { - /* (2nd or later pass) - * If we've already tried to lower the rate, and are - * now trying to raise it, use the lower rate. */ - if (new_rate != IWL_RATE_INVALID) - break; - - /* Loop again with higher rate */ - else if (high != IWL_RATE_INVALID) { - start_hi = high; - rate = high; - - /* Higher rate not available, use the original */ - } else { - new_rate = rate; - break; - } - } + if (success_ratio > RS_SR_NO_DECREASE) { + target_tpt = 100 * expected_current_tpt; + IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm, + "SR %d high. Find rate exceeding EXPECTED_CURRENT %d\n", + success_ratio, target_tpt); + } else { + target_tpt = lq_sta->last_tpt; + IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm, + "SR %d not thag good. Find rate exceeding ACTUAL_TPT %d\n", + success_ratio, target_tpt); } - return new_rate; + rate_idx = find_first_bit(&rate_mask, BITS_PER_LONG); + + while (rate_idx != IWL_RATE_INVALID) { + if (target_tpt < (100 * tpt_tbl[rate_idx])) + break; + + high_low = rs_get_adjacent_rate(mvm, rate_idx, rate_mask, + tbl->rate.type); + + rate_idx = (high_low >> 8) & 0xff; + } + + IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm, "Best rate found %d target_tp %d expected_new %d\n", + rate_idx, target_tpt, + rate_idx != IWL_RATE_INVALID ? + 100 * tpt_tbl[rate_idx] : IWL_INVALID_VALUE); + + return rate_idx; } static u32 rs_bw_from_sta_bw(struct ieee80211_sta *sta) @@ -1649,7 +1594,7 @@ static int rs_switch_to_column(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, const struct rs_tx_column *curr_column = &rs_tx_columns[tbl->column]; u32 sz = (sizeof(struct iwl_scale_tbl_info) - (sizeof(struct iwl_rate_scale_data) * IWL_RATE_COUNT)); - u16 rate_mask = 0; + unsigned long rate_mask = 0; u32 rate_idx = 0; memcpy(search_tbl, tbl, sz); @@ -1691,7 +1636,7 @@ static int rs_switch_to_column(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, !(BIT(rate_idx) & rate_mask)) { IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm, "can not switch with index %d" - " rate mask %x\n", + " rate mask %lx\n", rate_idx, rate_mask); goto err;