mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
x86/asm: Don't use the confusing '.ifeq' directive
I find the '.ifeq <expression>' directive to be confusing. Reading it quickly seems to suggest its opposite meaning, or that it's missing an argument. Improve readability by replacing all of its x86 uses with '.if <expression> == 0'. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/757da028e802c7e98d23fbab8d234b1063e161cf.1508516398.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bae9525531
commit
82c62fa0c4
|
@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ ENTRY(\sym)
|
|||
|
||||
ASM_CLAC
|
||||
|
||||
.ifeq \has_error_code
|
||||
.if \has_error_code == 0
|
||||
pushq $-1 /* ORIG_RAX: no syscall to restart */
|
||||
.endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ ENTRY(early_idt_handler_array)
|
|||
# 24(%rsp) error code
|
||||
i = 0
|
||||
.rept NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS
|
||||
.ifeq (EXCEPTION_ERRCODE_MASK >> i) & 1
|
||||
.if ((EXCEPTION_ERRCODE_MASK >> i) & 1) == 0
|
||||
pushl $0 # Dummy error code, to make stack frame uniform
|
||||
.endif
|
||||
pushl $i # 20(%esp) Vector number
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ ENDPROC(start_cpu0)
|
|||
ENTRY(early_idt_handler_array)
|
||||
i = 0
|
||||
.rept NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS
|
||||
.ifeq (EXCEPTION_ERRCODE_MASK >> i) & 1
|
||||
.if ((EXCEPTION_ERRCODE_MASK >> i) & 1) == 0
|
||||
UNWIND_HINT_IRET_REGS
|
||||
pushq $0 # Dummy error code, to make stack frame uniform
|
||||
.else
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue