mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
bcache: Remove unnecessary check in should_split()
Checking i->seq was redundant, because since ages ago we always initialize the new bset when advancing b->written Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2d679fc756
commit
8304ad4dc8
|
@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static inline void rw_unlock(bool w, struct btree *b)
|
|||
_w == insert_lock(op, _b)) \
|
||||
_r = bch_btree_ ## fn(_b, op, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
|
||||
rw_unlock(_w, _b); \
|
||||
bch_cannibalize_unlock(c, &(op)->cl); \
|
||||
bch_cannibalize_unlock(c, &(op)->cl); \
|
||||
} while (_r == -EINTR); \
|
||||
\
|
||||
_r; \
|
||||
|
@ -363,8 +363,7 @@ static inline bool should_split(struct btree *b)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct bset *i = write_block(b);
|
||||
return b->written >= btree_blocks(b) ||
|
||||
(i->seq == b->sets[0].data->seq &&
|
||||
b->written + __set_blocks(i, i->keys + 15, b->c)
|
||||
(b->written + __set_blocks(i, i->keys + 15, b->c)
|
||||
> btree_blocks(b));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue