btrfs: simplify the send_in_progress check in btrfs_delete_subvolume

Only when send_in_progress, we have to do something different such as
btrfs_warn() and return -EPERM. Therefore, we could check
send_in_progress first and process error handling, after the
root_item_lock has been got.

Just for better readability. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Lu Fengqi 2018-08-04 21:10:53 +08:00 committed by David Sterba
parent 35a7f35ad1
commit a7176f74fa
1 changed files with 5 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -4270,18 +4270,17 @@ int btrfs_delete_subvolume(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
* again is not run concurrently.
*/
spin_lock(&dest->root_item_lock);
root_flags = btrfs_root_flags(&dest->root_item);
if (dest->send_in_progress == 0) {
btrfs_set_root_flags(&dest->root_item,
root_flags | BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD);
spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
} else {
if (dest->send_in_progress) {
spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
btrfs_warn(fs_info,
"attempt to delete subvolume %llu during send",
dest->root_key.objectid);
return -EPERM;
}
root_flags = btrfs_root_flags(&dest->root_item);
btrfs_set_root_flags(&dest->root_item,
root_flags | BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD);
spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
down_write(&fs_info->subvol_sem);