From aa9fc0c19bee0cbc152e0e06488095fb69229236 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Davidlohr Bueso Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:41:52 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] locking/mcs: Remove obsolete comment ... as we clearly inline mcs_spin_lock() now. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso Acked-by: Jason Low Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: aswin@hp.com Cc: Linus Torvalds Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1406752916-3341-3-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h index 23e89c5930e9..4d60986fcbee 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h +++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h @@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ do { \ * If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin * on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked * in mcs_spin_unlock(). - * - * We don't inline mcs_spin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the - * time spent in this lock function. */ static inline void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)