reverse_path_check_proc(): sane arguments

no need to force its calling conventions to match the callback for
late unlamented ep_call_nested()...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Al Viro 2020-08-22 23:29:02 -04:00
parent 773318eddb
commit aebf15f0fb
1 changed files with 5 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -1306,20 +1306,18 @@ static void path_count_init(void)
path_count[i] = 0;
}
static int reverse_path_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int depth)
static int reverse_path_check_proc(struct file *file, int depth)
{
int error = 0;
struct file *file = priv;
struct file *child_file;
struct epitem *epi;
if (!ep_push_nested(cookie)) /* limits recursion */
if (!ep_push_nested(file)) /* limits recursion */
return -1;
/* CTL_DEL can remove links here, but that can't increase our count */
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(epi, &file->f_ep_links, fllink) {
child_file = epi->ep->file;
struct file *child_file = epi->ep->file;
if (is_file_epoll(child_file)) {
if (list_empty(&child_file->f_ep_links)) {
if (path_count_inc(depth)) {
@ -1327,7 +1325,7 @@ static int reverse_path_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int depth)
break;
}
} else {
error = reverse_path_check_proc(child_file, child_file,
error = reverse_path_check_proc(child_file,
depth + 1);
}
if (error != 0)
@ -1360,7 +1358,7 @@ static int reverse_path_check(void)
/* let's call this for all tfiles */
list_for_each_entry(current_file, &tfile_check_list, f_tfile_llink) {
path_count_init();
error = reverse_path_check_proc(current_file, current_file, 0);
error = reverse_path_check_proc(current_file, 0);
if (error)
break;
}