Btrfs: send, fix corner case for reference overwrite detection

When the inode given to did_overwrite_ref() matches the current progress
and has a reference that collides with the reference of other inode that
has the same number as the current progress, we were always telling our
caller that the inode's reference was overwritten, which is incorrect
because the other inode might be a new inode (different generation number)
in which case we must return false from did_overwrite_ref() so that its
callers don't use an orphanized path for the inode (as it will never be
orphanized, instead it will be unlinked and the new inode created later).

The following test case for fstests reproduces the issue:

  seq=`basename $0`
  seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
  echo "QA output created by $seq"

  tmp=/tmp/$$
  status=1	# failure is the default!
  trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15

  _cleanup()
  {
      rm -fr $send_files_dir
      rm -f $tmp.*
  }

  # get standard environment, filters and checks
  . ./common/rc
  . ./common/filter

  # real QA test starts here
  _supported_fs btrfs
  _supported_os Linux
  _require_scratch
  _need_to_be_root

  send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq

  rm -f $seqres.full
  rm -fr $send_files_dir
  mkdir $send_files_dir

  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
  _scratch_mount

  # Create our test file with a single extent of 64K.
  mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo/bar \
      | _filter_xfs_io

  _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
  _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot $SCRATCH_MNT \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2

  echo "File digest before being replaced:"
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo/bar | _filter_scratch

  # Remove the file and then create a new one in the same location with
  # the same name but with different content. This new file ends up
  # getting the same inode number as the previous one, because that inode
  # number was the highest inode number used by the snapshot's root and
  # therefore when attempting to find the a new inode number for the new
  # file, we end up reusing the same inode number. This happens because
  # currently btrfs uses the highest inode number summed by 1 for the
  # first inode created once a snapshot's root is loaded (done at
  # fs/btrfs/inode-map.c:btrfs_find_free_objectid in the linux kernel
  # tree).
  # Having these two different files in the snapshots with the same inode
  # number (but different generation numbers) caused the btrfs send code
  # to emit an incorrect path for the file when issuing an unlink
  # operation because it failed to realize they were different files.
  rm -f $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar
  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0 96K" \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar | _filter_xfs_io

  _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro

  _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
  _run_btrfs_util_prog send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro -f $send_files_dir/2.snap

  echo "File digest in the original filesystem after being replaced:"
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch

  # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify
  # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had.
  _scratch_unmount
  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
  _scratch_mount

  _run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
  _run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/2.snap

  echo "File digest in the new filesystem:"
  # Must match the digest from the new file.
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch

  status=0
  exit

Reported-by: Martin Raiber <martin@urbackup.org>
Fixes: 8b191a6849 ("Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

fs/btrfs/send.c

@@ -1920,10 +1920,12 @@ static int did_overwrite_ref(struct send_ctx *sctx,
 	/*
 	 * We know that it is or will be overwritten. Check this now.
 	 * The current inode being processed might have been the one that caused
-	 * inode 'ino' to be orphanized, therefore ow_inode can actually be the
-	 * same as sctx->send_progress.
+	 * inode 'ino' to be orphanized, therefore check if ow_inode matches
+	 * the current inode being processed.
 	 */
-	if (ow_inode <= sctx->send_progress)
+	if ((ow_inode < sctx->send_progress) ||
+	    (ino != sctx->cur_ino && ow_inode == sctx->cur_ino &&
+	     gen == sctx->cur_inode_gen))
 		ret = 1;
 	else
 		ret = 0;