mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
Documentation: cpu-hotplug: Fix typos
Fix some minor spelling errors and capitalization issues. Signed-off-by: Igor Vuk <parcijala@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b855a120b
commit
bb118c56fd
|
@ -84,9 +84,9 @@ are added or removed anytime. Trimming it accurately for your system needs
|
|||
upfront can save some boot time memory. See below for how we use heuristics
|
||||
in x86_64 case to keep this under check.
|
||||
|
||||
cpu_online_mask: Bitmap of all CPUs currently online. Its set in __cpu_up()
|
||||
after a cpu is available for kernel scheduling and ready to receive
|
||||
interrupts from devices. Its cleared when a cpu is brought down using
|
||||
cpu_online_mask: Bitmap of all CPUs currently online. It's set in __cpu_up()
|
||||
after a CPU is available for kernel scheduling and ready to receive
|
||||
interrupts from devices. It's cleared when a CPU is brought down using
|
||||
__cpu_disable(), before which all OS services including interrupts are
|
||||
migrated to another target CPU.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ To support physical addition/removal, one would need some BIOS hooks and
|
|||
the platform should have something like an attention button in PCI hotplug.
|
||||
CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU enables ACPI support for physical add/remove of CPUs.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: How do i logically offline a CPU?
|
||||
Q: How do I logically offline a CPU?
|
||||
A: Do the following.
|
||||
|
||||
#echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online
|
||||
|
@ -191,15 +191,15 @@ Once the logical offline is successful, check
|
|||
#cat /proc/interrupts
|
||||
|
||||
You should now not see the CPU that you removed. Also online file will report
|
||||
the state as 0 when a cpu if offline and 1 when its online.
|
||||
the state as 0 when a CPU is offline and 1 when it's online.
|
||||
|
||||
#To display the current cpu state.
|
||||
#cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Why can't i remove CPU0 on some systems?
|
||||
Q: Why can't I remove CPU0 on some systems?
|
||||
A: Some architectures may have some special dependency on a certain CPU.
|
||||
|
||||
For e.g in IA64 platforms we have ability to sent platform interrupts to the
|
||||
For e.g in IA64 platforms we have ability to send platform interrupts to the
|
||||
OS. a.k.a Corrected Platform Error Interrupts (CPEI). In current ACPI
|
||||
specifications, we didn't have a way to change the target CPU. Hence if the
|
||||
current ACPI version doesn't support such re-direction, we disable that CPU
|
||||
|
@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ either by CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0 or by kernel parameter cpu0_hotplug.
|
|||
|
||||
--Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
|
||||
|
||||
Q: How do i find out if a particular CPU is not removable?
|
||||
Q: How do I find out if a particular CPU is not removable?
|
||||
A: Depending on the implementation, some architectures may show this by the
|
||||
absence of the "online" file. This is done if it can be determined ahead of
|
||||
time that this CPU cannot be removed.
|
||||
|
@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ A: The following happen, listed in no particular order :-)
|
|||
- All processes are migrated away from this outgoing CPU to new CPUs.
|
||||
The new CPU is chosen from each process' current cpuset, which may be
|
||||
a subset of all online CPUs.
|
||||
- All interrupts targeted to this CPU is migrated to a new CPU
|
||||
- All interrupts targeted to this CPU are migrated to a new CPU
|
||||
- timers/bottom half/task lets are also migrated to a new CPU
|
||||
- Once all services are migrated, kernel calls an arch specific routine
|
||||
__cpu_disable() to perform arch specific cleanup.
|
||||
|
@ -259,10 +259,10 @@ A: The following happen, listed in no particular order :-)
|
|||
CPU is being offlined).
|
||||
|
||||
"It is expected that each service cleans up when the CPU_DOWN_PREPARE
|
||||
notifier is called, when CPU_DEAD is called its expected there is nothing
|
||||
notifier is called, when CPU_DEAD is called it's expected there is nothing
|
||||
running on behalf of this CPU that was offlined"
|
||||
|
||||
Q: If i have some kernel code that needs to be aware of CPU arrival and
|
||||
Q: If I have some kernel code that needs to be aware of CPU arrival and
|
||||
departure, how to i arrange for proper notification?
|
||||
A: This is what you would need in your kernel code to receive notifications.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ things will happen if a notifier in path sent a BAD notify code.
|
|||
|
||||
Q: I don't see my action being called for all CPUs already up and running?
|
||||
A: Yes, CPU notifiers are called only when new CPUs are on-lined or offlined.
|
||||
If you need to perform some action for each cpu already in the system, then
|
||||
If you need to perform some action for each CPU already in the system, then
|
||||
do this:
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
|
||||
|
@ -363,8 +363,8 @@ A: Yes, CPU notifiers are called only when new CPUs are on-lined or offlined.
|
|||
callbacks as well as initialize the already online CPUs.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Q: If i would like to develop cpu hotplug support for a new architecture,
|
||||
what do i need at a minimum?
|
||||
Q: If I would like to develop CPU hotplug support for a new architecture,
|
||||
what do I need at a minimum?
|
||||
A: The following are what is required for CPU hotplug infrastructure to work
|
||||
correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -382,8 +382,8 @@ A: The following are what is required for CPU hotplug infrastructure to work
|
|||
per_cpu state to be set, to ensure the processor
|
||||
dead routine is called to be sure positively.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: I need to ensure that a particular cpu is not removed when there is some
|
||||
work specific to this cpu is in progress.
|
||||
Q: I need to ensure that a particular CPU is not removed when there is some
|
||||
work specific to this CPU in progress.
|
||||
A: There are two ways. If your code can be run in interrupt context, use
|
||||
smp_call_function_single(), otherwise use work_on_cpu(). Note that
|
||||
work_on_cpu() is slow, and can fail due to out of memory:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue