nfs: use blocking page_group_lock in add_request

__nfs_pageio_add_request was calling nfs_page_group_lock nonblocking, but
this can return -EAGAIN which would end up passing -EIO to the application.

There is no reason not to block in this path, so change the two calls to
do so. Also, there is no need to check the return value of
nfs_page_group_lock when nonblock=false, so remove the error handling code.

Signed-off-by: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
This commit is contained in:
Weston Andros Adamson 2014-08-08 11:00:55 -04:00 committed by Trond Myklebust
parent bc8a309e88
commit bfd484a560
1 changed files with 2 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -864,13 +864,8 @@ static int __nfs_pageio_add_request(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *desc,
struct nfs_page *subreq;
unsigned int bytes_left = 0;
unsigned int offset, pgbase;
int ret;
ret = nfs_page_group_lock(req, true);
if (ret < 0) {
desc->pg_error = ret;
return 0;
}
nfs_page_group_lock(req, false);
subreq = req;
bytes_left = subreq->wb_bytes;
@ -892,11 +887,7 @@ static int __nfs_pageio_add_request(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *desc,
if (desc->pg_recoalesce)
return 0;
/* retry add_request for this subreq */
ret = nfs_page_group_lock(req, true);
if (ret < 0) {
desc->pg_error = ret;
return 0;
}
nfs_page_group_lock(req, false);
continue;
}