mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
ARM, sched/topology: Remove SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN
This flag was introduced in 2014 by commit:
d77b3ed5c9
("sched: Add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain")
but AFAIA it was never leveraged by the scheduler. The closest thing I can
think of is EAS caring about frequency domains, and it does that by
leveraging performance domains.
Remove the flag. No change in functionality is expected.
Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817113003.20802-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
18445bf405
commit
cfe7ddcbd7
|
@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
|
|||
|
||||
static inline int cpu_corepower_flags(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN;
|
||||
return SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct sched_domain_topology_level arm_topology[] = {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -18,13 +18,12 @@
|
|||
#define SD_WAKE_AFFINE 0x0010 /* Wake task to waking CPU */
|
||||
#define SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY 0x0020 /* Domain members have different CPU capacities */
|
||||
#define SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY 0x0040 /* Domain members share CPU capacity */
|
||||
#define SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN 0x0080 /* Domain members share power domain */
|
||||
#define SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES 0x0100 /* Domain members share CPU pkg resources */
|
||||
#define SD_SERIALIZE 0x0200 /* Only a single load balancing instance */
|
||||
#define SD_ASYM_PACKING 0x0400 /* Place busy groups earlier in the domain */
|
||||
#define SD_PREFER_SIBLING 0x0800 /* Prefer to place tasks in a sibling domain */
|
||||
#define SD_OVERLAP 0x1000 /* sched_domains of this level overlap */
|
||||
#define SD_NUMA 0x2000 /* cross-node balancing */
|
||||
#define SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES 0x0080 /* Domain members share CPU pkg resources */
|
||||
#define SD_SERIALIZE 0x0100 /* Only a single load balancing instance */
|
||||
#define SD_ASYM_PACKING 0x0200 /* Place busy groups earlier in the domain */
|
||||
#define SD_PREFER_SIBLING 0x0400 /* Prefer to place tasks in a sibling domain */
|
||||
#define SD_OVERLAP 0x0800 /* sched_domains of this level overlap */
|
||||
#define SD_NUMA 0x1000 /* cross-node balancing */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
|
||||
static inline int cpu_smt_flags(void)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -148,8 +148,7 @@ static int sd_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd)
|
|||
SD_BALANCE_EXEC |
|
||||
SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY |
|
||||
SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY |
|
||||
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES |
|
||||
SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN)) {
|
||||
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)) {
|
||||
if (sd->groups != sd->groups->next)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -180,8 +179,7 @@ sd_parent_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_domain *parent)
|
|||
SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY |
|
||||
SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY |
|
||||
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES |
|
||||
SD_PREFER_SIBLING |
|
||||
SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN);
|
||||
SD_PREFER_SIBLING);
|
||||
if (nr_node_ids == 1)
|
||||
pflags &= ~SD_SERIALIZE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1292,7 +1290,6 @@ int __read_mostly node_reclaim_distance = RECLAIM_DISTANCE;
|
|||
* SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY - describes SMT topologies
|
||||
* SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES - describes shared caches
|
||||
* SD_NUMA - describes NUMA topologies
|
||||
* SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN - describes shared power domain
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Odd one out, which beside describing the topology has a quirk also
|
||||
* prescribes the desired behaviour that goes along with it:
|
||||
|
@ -1303,8 +1300,7 @@ int __read_mostly node_reclaim_distance = RECLAIM_DISTANCE;
|
|||
(SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | \
|
||||
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | \
|
||||
SD_NUMA | \
|
||||
SD_ASYM_PACKING | \
|
||||
SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN)
|
||||
SD_ASYM_PACKING)
|
||||
|
||||
static struct sched_domain *
|
||||
sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue