[PATCH] Fix missing parens in set_personality()

If you call set_personality() with an expression such as:

	set_personality(foo ? PERS_FOO1 : PERS_FOO2);

then this evaluates to:

	((current->personality == foo ? PERS_FOO1 : PERS_FOO2) ? ...

which is obviously not the intended result.  Add the missing parents
to ensure this gets evaluated as expected:

	((current->personality == (foo ? PERS_FOO1 : PERS_FOO2)) ? ...

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Russell King 2006-11-10 12:27:53 -08:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent e40c67597e
commit d8b295f290
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ struct exec_domain {
* Change personality of the currently running process.
*/
#define set_personality(pers) \
((current->personality == pers) ? 0 : __set_personality(pers))
((current->personality == (pers)) ? 0 : __set_personality(pers))
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */