mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
genirq: Avoid deadlock in spurious handling
commit 52553ddf(genirq: fix regression in irqfixup, irqpoll) introduced a potential deadlock by calling the action handler with the irq descriptor lock held. Remove the call and let the handling code run even for an interrupt where only a single action is registered. That matches the goal of the above commit and avoids the deadlock. Document the confusing action = desc->action reload in the handling loop while at it. Reported-and-tested-by: "Wang, Warner" <warner.wang@hp.com> Tested-by: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@numble.net> Cc: "Wang, Song-Bo (Stoney)" <song-bo.wang@hp.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
04aa530ec0
commit
e716efde75
|
@ -80,13 +80,11 @@ static int try_one_irq(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, bool force)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* All handlers must agree on IRQF_SHARED, so we test just the
|
* All handlers must agree on IRQF_SHARED, so we test just the
|
||||||
* first. Check for action->next as well.
|
* first.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
action = desc->action;
|
action = desc->action;
|
||||||
if (!action || !(action->flags & IRQF_SHARED) ||
|
if (!action || !(action->flags & IRQF_SHARED) ||
|
||||||
(action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER) ||
|
(action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER))
|
||||||
(action->handler(irq, action->dev_id) == IRQ_HANDLED) ||
|
|
||||||
!action->next)
|
|
||||||
goto out;
|
goto out;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Already running on another processor */
|
/* Already running on another processor */
|
||||||
|
@ -104,6 +102,7 @@ static int try_one_irq(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, bool force)
|
||||||
do {
|
do {
|
||||||
if (handle_irq_event(desc) == IRQ_HANDLED)
|
if (handle_irq_event(desc) == IRQ_HANDLED)
|
||||||
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
|
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
|
||||||
|
/* Make sure that there is still a valid action */
|
||||||
action = desc->action;
|
action = desc->action;
|
||||||
} while ((desc->istate & IRQS_PENDING) && action);
|
} while ((desc->istate & IRQS_PENDING) && action);
|
||||||
desc->istate &= ~IRQS_POLL_INPROGRESS;
|
desc->istate &= ~IRQS_POLL_INPROGRESS;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue