mmc: sdhci: Get rid of host->busy_handle

Now that there is host->data_cmd to record the command for which a data
interrupt is expected, it is possible to determine whether a command with
busy signaling has completed without an extra flag. So host->busy_handle
is not needed. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Adrian Hunter 2016-06-29 16:24:24 +03:00 committed by Ulf Hansson
parent 7c89a3d908
commit ea96802384
2 changed files with 6 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -1014,7 +1014,6 @@ void sdhci_send_command(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
mod_timer(&host->timer, timeout);
host->cmd = cmd;
host->busy_handle = 0;
if (cmd->data || cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_BUSY) {
WARN_ON(host->data_cmd);
host->data_cmd = cmd;
@ -1094,9 +1093,8 @@ static void sdhci_finish_command(struct sdhci_host *host)
if (cmd->data) {
DBG("Cannot wait for busy signal when also doing a data transfer");
} else if (!(host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_BUSY_IRQ) &&
!host->busy_handle) {
/* Mark that command complete before busy is ended */
host->busy_handle = 1;
cmd == host->data_cmd) {
/* Command complete before busy is ended */
return;
}
}
@ -2393,10 +2391,10 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
* before the command completed, so make
* sure we do things in the proper order.
*/
if (host->busy_handle)
tasklet_schedule(&host->finish_tasklet);
else
host->busy_handle = 1;
if (host->cmd == data_cmd)
return;
tasklet_schedule(&host->finish_tasklet);
return;
}
}

View File

@ -469,7 +469,6 @@ struct sdhci_host {
struct mmc_command *data_cmd; /* Current data command */
struct mmc_data *data; /* Current data request */
unsigned int data_early:1; /* Data finished before cmd */
unsigned int busy_handle:1; /* Handling the order of Busy-end */
struct sg_mapping_iter sg_miter; /* SG state for PIO */
unsigned int blocks; /* remaining PIO blocks */