Merge branch 'cgroup/for-3.14-fixes' into cgroup/for-3.15

Pull in for-3.14-fixes to receive 532de3fc72 ("cgroup: update
cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists() to grab siglock") which conflicts with
afeb0f9fd4 ("cgroup: relocate cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists()") and
the following cg_lists updates.  This is likely to cause further
conflicts down the line too, so let's merge it early.

As cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists() is relocated in for-3.15, this merge
causes conflict in the original position.  It's resolved by applying
siglock changes to the updated version in the new location.

Conflicts:
	kernel/cgroup.c

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Tejun Heo 2014-02-25 09:56:49 -05:00
commit f153ad11bc
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -1331,9 +1331,13 @@ static void cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists(void)
* We should check if the process is exiting, otherwise * We should check if the process is exiting, otherwise
* it will race with cgroup_exit() in that the list * it will race with cgroup_exit() in that the list
* entry won't be deleted though the process has exited. * entry won't be deleted though the process has exited.
* Do it while holding siglock so that we don't end up
* racing against cgroup_exit().
*/ */
spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
if (!(p->flags & PF_EXITING)) if (!(p->flags & PF_EXITING))
list_add(&p->cg_list, &task_css_set(p)->tasks); list_add(&p->cg_list, &task_css_set(p)->tasks);
spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
task_unlock(p); task_unlock(p);
} while_each_thread(g, p); } while_each_thread(g, p);
@ -3968,16 +3972,12 @@ static int __init cgroup_wq_init(void)
/* /*
* There isn't much point in executing destruction path in * There isn't much point in executing destruction path in
* parallel. Good chunk is serialized with cgroup_mutex anyway. * parallel. Good chunk is serialized with cgroup_mutex anyway.
* * Use 1 for @max_active.
* XXX: Must be ordered to make sure parent is offlined after
* children. The ordering requirement is for memcg where a
* parent's offline may wait for a child's leading to deadlock. In
* the long term, this should be fixed from memcg side.
* *
* We would prefer to do this in cgroup_init() above, but that * We would prefer to do this in cgroup_init() above, but that
* is called before init_workqueues(): so leave this until after. * is called before init_workqueues(): so leave this until after.
*/ */
cgroup_destroy_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("cgroup_destroy", 0); cgroup_destroy_wq = alloc_workqueue("cgroup_destroy", 0, 1);
BUG_ON(!cgroup_destroy_wq); BUG_ON(!cgroup_destroy_wq);
/* /*