The various rt2x00 drivers use different methods to name the different
GPIO register fields indicating the GPIO pin value and the fields
indicating the direction.
Start using a unified naming scheme for the GPIO register fields:
- <csr>_VAL<x> for fields indicating the GPIO pin value.
- <csr>_DIR<x> for fields indicating the GPIO pin direction.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Ensure that all active GPIO pins are included in the GPIO register
definitions, nothing more and nothing less.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
We need to program the rfkill switch GPIO pin direction to input at
device initialization time, not only when the interface is brought up.
Doing this only when the interface is brought up could lead to rfkill
detecting the switch is turned on erroneously and inability to create
the interface and bringing it up.
Reported-and-tested-by: Andreas Messer <andi@bastelmap.de>
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
rt2400pci.h:812: ERROR: space prohibited after that open parenthesis '('
rt2400pci.h:812: ERROR: space prohibited before that close parenthesis ')'
rt2400pci.h:813: ERROR: space prohibited after that open parenthesis '('
rt2400pci.h:813: ERROR: space prohibited before that close parenthesis ')'
rt2400pci.h:950: ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
Signed-off-by: Mark Einon <mark.einon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The recent rt2800 devices are no longer really identified by their PCI
ID's, but rather by the contents of their CSR0 register. Also for the
other chipsets is the contents of this CSR0 register important.
Change the chipset determination logic to be more aligned with the rt2800
model.
Preparation for the support of rt3070 / rt3090 based devices.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
As mentioned on the linux-wireless mailing list, the current copyright
statements in the rt2x00 are meaningless, as the rt2x00 project is
not even a formal legal entity. Therefore it is better to replace
the existing copyright statements with copyright statements for the
people that actually wrote the code.
Note: Updated to the best of my knowledge with respect to who
contributed considerable amounts of code.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
CC: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Fix a bunch of spelling errors in the rt2x00 drivers
Signed-off-by: Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The only way rf_write() can be called with word 0 is
when the user sends the wrong word index through debugfs.
However the values which are send through debugfs are
validated using the RF_BASE and RF_SIZE macro values,
the most logical solution is to increase RF_BASE with 4
and decrease RF_SIZE with 4 (RF_SIZE has always been
1 word too big)
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Move calculation of CSR register offset into rt2x00debug.c
and remove the wrapper functions from each individual driver.
(Except rt2500usb, which still needs to wrap for the
different value type argument).
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Channel information which is read from EEPROM should
be read into an array containing per-channel information.
This removes the requirement of multiple arrays and makes
the channel handling a bit cleaner and easier to expand.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
MAX_RX_SSI and MAX_NOISE are no longer used,
it is better to remove them entirely.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
With the integration of the mac80211 multiqueue patches it has become possible that the
mac80211 layer modifies the number of TX queues that is stored inside the ieee80211_hw
structure, especially when multi-queue is not selected.
The rt2x00 drivers are not well suited to handle that situation, as they allocate the
queue structures before mac80211 has modified the number of queues it is going to use,
and also expect the number of allocated queues to match the hardware implementation.
Hence, ensure that rt2x00 maintains by itself the number of queues that the hardware
supports, and, at the same time, making is not dependent on the preservation of contents
inside a mac80211 structure.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@kpnplanet.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
After sampling hundreds of RX frame descriptors,
the results were conclusive:
- The Ralink documentation regarding the SIGNAL and RSSI are wrong.
It turns out that of the 5 BBR registers, we should not use BBR0 and BBR1
for SIGNAL and RSSI respectively, but actually BBR1 and BBR2.
BBR0 does show values, but the exact meaning remains unclear,
but they cannot be translated into a SIGNAL or RSSI field.
BBR3, BBR4 and BBR5 are always 0, so their meaning is unknown.
As it turns out, the reported SIGNAL is the PLCP value, this
in contradiction to what was expected looking at rt2500pci which
only reported the PLCP values for OFDM rates and bitrate values
for CCK rates.
This means we should let the driver raise the flag about the contents
of the SIGNAL field so rt2x00lib can always do the right thing based
on what the driver reports.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The dscape stack was renamed to mac80211 a long time ago,
we are long overdue with fixing all comments to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Extend word field definitions for the PLCP words
in the TX descriptor to contain the BBP fields as well.
This will remove rt2400pci_write_tx_desc() from the
checkstack script.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Coverty indicated that data_desc with a single
element array is bad coding style. This removes
the structure and forces everybody to use __le32.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Gertjan van Wingerde