rockchip_clk_register_ddrclk should not return NULL when failing
to call clk_register, otherwise rockchip_clk_register_branches
prints "unknown clock type". The actual case is that it's a known
clock type but we fail to register it, which may makes user confuse
the reason of failure. And the pr_err here is pointless as
rockchip_clk_register_branches will also print the similar message.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Changing the rate of the DDR clock needs special care, as the DDR
is of course in use and will react badly if the rate changes under it.
Over time different approaches to handle that were used.
Past SoCs like the rk3288 and before would store some code in SRAM
while the rk3368 used a SCPI variant and let a coprocessor handle that.
New rockchip platforms like the rk3399 have a dcf controller to do ddr
frequency scaling, and support for this controller will be implemented
in the arm-trusted-firmware.
This new clock-type should over time handle all these methods for
handling DDR rate changes, but right now it will concentrate on the
SIP interface used to talk to ARM trusted firmware.
The SIP interface counterpart was merged from pull-request #684 [0]
into the upstream arm-trusted-firmware codebase.
[0] https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/pull/684
Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Shawn Lin