A new lvb for a userland lock wasn't being initialized to zero.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
A long, complicated sequence of events, beginning with the RESEND flag not
being cleared on an lkb, can result in an unlock never completing.
- lkb on waiters list for remote lookup
- the remote node is both the dir node and the master node, so
it optimizes the lookup into a request and sends a request
reply back
- the request reply is saved on the requestqueue to be processed
after recovery
- recovery runs dlm_recover_waiters_pre() which sets RESEND flag
so the lookup will be resent after recovery
- end of recovery: process_requestqueue takes saved request reply
which removes the lkb off the waitesr list, _without_ clearing
the RESEND flag
- end of recovery: dlm_recover_waiters_post() doesn't do anything
with the now completed lookup lkb (would usually clear RESEND)
- later, the node unmounts, unlocks this lkb that still has RESEND
flag set
- the lkb is on the waiters list again, now for unlock, when recovery
occurs, dlm_recover_waiters_pre() shows the lkb for unlock with RESEND
set, doesn't do anything since the master still exists
- end of recovery: dlm_recover_waiters_post() takes this lkb off
the waiters list because it has the RESEND flag set, then reports
an error because unlocks are never supposed to be handled in
recover_waiters_post().
- later, the unlock reply is received, doesn't find the lkb on
the waiters list because recover_waiters_post() has wrongly
removed it.
- the unlock operation has been lost, and we're left with a
stray granted lock
- unmount spins waiting for the unlock to complete
The visible evidence of this problem will be a node where gfs umount is
spinning, the dlm waiters list will be empty, and the dlm locks list will
show a granted lock.
The fix is simply to clear the RESEND flag when taking an lkb off the
waiters list.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
dlm_receive_message() returns 0 instead of returning 'error'. What would
happen is that process_requestqueue would take a saved message off the
requestqueue and call receive_message on it. receive_message would then
see that recovery had been aborted, set error to EINTR, and 'goto out',
expecting that the error would be returned. Instead, 0 was always
returned, so process_requestqueue would think that the message had been
processed and delete it instead of saving it to process next time. This
means the message (usually an unlock in my tests) would be lost.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
When a user process exits, we clear all the locks it holds. There is a
problem, though, with locks that the process had begun unlocking before it
exited. We couldn't find the lkb's that were in the process of being
unlocked remotely, to flag that they are DEAD. To solve this, we move
lkb's being unlocked onto a new list in the per-process structure that
tracks what locks the process is holding. We can then go through this
list to flag the necessary lkb's when clearing locks for a process when it
exits.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Add a "ci_" prefix to the fields in the dlm_config_info struct so that we
can use macros to add configfs functions to access them (in a later
patch). No functional changes in this patch, just naming changes.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
When the dlm fakes an unlock/cancel reply from a failed node using a stub
message struct, it wasn't setting the flags in the stub message. So, in
the process of receiving the fake message the lkb flags would be updated
and cleared from the zero flags in the message. The problem observed in
tests was the loss of the USER flag which caused the dlm to think a user
lock was a kernel lock and subsequently fail an assertion checking the
validity of the ast/callback field.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
LVB's are not sent as part of new requests, but the code receiving the
request was copying data into the lvb anyway. The space in the message
where it mistakenly thought the lvb lived actually contained the resource
name, so it wound up incorrectly copying this name data into the lvb. Fix
is to just create the lvb, not copy junk into it.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
The send_args() function is used to copy parameters into a message for a
number different message types. Only some of those types are set up
beforehand (in create_message) to include space for sending lvb data.
send_args was wrongly copying the lvb for all message types as long as the
lock had an lvb. This means that the lvb data was being written past the
end of the message into unknown space.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
There's a chance the new master of resource hasn't learned it's the new
master before another node sends it a lock during recovery. The node
sending the lock needs to resend if this happens.
- A sends a master lookup for resource R to C
- B sends a master lookup for resource R to C
- C receives A's lookup, assigns A to be master of R and
sends a reply back to A
- C receives B's lookup and sends a reply back to B saying
that A is the master
- B receives lookup reply from C and sends its lock for R to A
- A receives lock from B, doesn't think it's the master of R
and sends an error back to B
- A receives lookup reply from C and becomes master of R
- B gets error back from A and resends its lock back to A
(this resending is what this patch does)
- A receives lock from B, it now sees it's the master of R
and takes the lock
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
RH BZ 211622
The ALTMODE flag can be set in the lock master's copy of the lock but
never cleared, so ALTMODE will also be returned in a subsequent conversion
of the lock when it shouldn't be. This results in lock_dlm incorrectly
switching to the alternate lock mode when returning the result to gfs
which then asserts when it sees the wrong lock state. The fix is to
propagate the cleared sbflags value to the master node when the lock is
requested. QA's d_rwrandirectlarge test triggers this bug very quickly.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Red Hat BZ 211914
There's a race between dlm_recoverd (1) enabling locking and (2) clearing
out the requestqueue, and dlm_recvd (1) checking if locking is enabled and
(2) adding a message to the requestqueue. An order of recoverd(1),
recvd(1), recvd(2), recoverd(2) will result in a message being left on the
requestqueue. The fix is to have dlm_recvd check if dlm_recoverd has
enabled locking after taking the mutex for the requestqueue and if it has
processing the message instead of queueing it.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Fixing the following scenario:
- A request is on the waiters list waiting for a reply from a remote node.
- The request is the first one on the resource, so first_lkid is set.
- The remote node fails causing recovery.
- During recovery the requesting node becomes master.
- The request is now processed locally instead of being a remote operation.
- At this point we need to call confirm_master() on the resource since
we're certain we're now the master node. This will clear first_lkid.
- We weren't calling confirm_master(), so first_lkid was not being cleared
causing subsequent requests on that resource to get stuck.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
The down-conversion optimization was resulting in the lkb flags being
cleared because the stub message reply had no flags value set. Copy the
current flags into the stub message so they'll be copied back into the lkb
as part of processing the fake reply. Also add an assertion to catch this
error more directly if it exists elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Oh, and here's (hopefully) the last of these ua_tmp patches. I think I've
caught all the paths now. Sorry it didn't make the last one.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
This patch fixes bz#203444 where the LKSB was lost during userland conversion
operations
Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Introduce new function dlm_dump_rsb() to call within assertions instead of
dlm_print_rsb(). The new function dumps info about all locks on the rsb
in addition to rsb details.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
This patch fixes the userland DLM unlock code so that it correctly returns the
address of the userland lock status block in its completion AST.
It fixes bug #201348
Patrick
Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
The loop through all waiting locks in recover_waiters can potentially be
long, so we should schedule explicitly.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
The loop in grant_after_purge is intended to find all rsb's in each hash
bucket that have the LOCKS_PURGED flag set. The loop was quitting the
current bucket after finding just one rsb instead of going until there are
no more.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
User NOQUEUE lock requests to a remote node that failed with -EAGAIN were
never being removed from a process's list of locks.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 10:48:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.18-rc1-mm1:
>...
> git-gfs2.patch
>...
> git trees.
>...
This patch removes the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dlm_lvb_operations).
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now
aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is
no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy
of every user lock.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
In dlm_grant_after_purge() we were holding a hash table read_lock while
calling put_rsb() which potentially removes the rsb from the hash table,
taking the same lock in write. Fix this by flagging rsb's ahead of time
that have been purged. Then iteratively read_lock the hash table, find a
flagged rsb, unlock, process rsb.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that
it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
This patch removes support for range locking from the DLM
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required
to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and
can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either
of these two projects.
It implements VAX-style locking modes.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
David Teigland